EPTTL Mafia XLIV
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 18 2011 08:36 GMarshal wrote: Foolishness is being indecisive, he must be scum! You're calling out Foolishness. You must be scum. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 18 2011 09:17 chaoser wrote: what a chainsaw defense jackal. scum Tunnels chaoser all of day 1 and 2. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 19 2011 05:10 Curu wrote: Cool, but what I actually asked was what do you think of the chances of Foolishness (he's actually in this game) as being the Town Vet? Non existent. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 19 2011 05:27 Curu wrote: So, what thought process goes on in your head when you decide to claim Vanilla Townie with your first post? He's obviously a Kenpachi disciple. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 19 2011 06:01 Kurumi wrote: Let's play a game. You win, I don't, You lose, I do. You are in a room. It has thick, cold and bare walls. One of them is made of unbreakable glass. There is a sandvich and bonk! energy drink behind it. You are very thirsty and very hungry. You have a crowbar, flamethrower and 30 pieces of shuriken. What do You do to get the food? Put a dollar in the machine and push the right buttons. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 19 2011 06:10 chaoser wrote: sup jackal, long time no see ^_^ What do you think about Lucidity and Curu? Just trying to get conversation started or something more sinister? Curu trying to start a convo on a Day post hiccup that GMarshall wasn't going to let go on. No biggy there I don't think. Lucidity is obviously a student of Kenpachi. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 19 2011 07:45 Curu wrote: Being careful not to talk too much is the mark of someone who has guilt on their mind. Townies have nothing to hide and so should never be afraid to talk as long as it isn't stupid useless stuff spamming up the thread. It's also a sign of intimidation and uncertainty on how to proceed. The best way to keep noobs engaged is to ask them questions. Let them know that we value their opinion and nobody is going to jump on them for being a noob. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 19 2011 08:12 xtfftc wrote: I agree, of course. If the whole population takes part in the democracy process, the people become too powerful to be messed with. But it often takes just one ordinary citizen to show signs of cowardice - and suddenly we see a snowball effect affecting the whole town. This is a fucking game. You don't die for real. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 20 2011 01:43 Palmar wrote: how about you vote the crazy australian with a cricket bat instead? I think it was the crazy Icelander with a snow shovel. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 20 2011 01:53 supersoft wrote: hey, do you buy nards story, that he's "damaged" from a former game and therefor not suspecting anyone? No. Looked like a joke to me. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 20 2011 18:05 Barundar wrote: Palmar, what exactly make you go from DB is scum to Brown Bear is scum? Seems like someone just disagreed with you and you decided to give up your case for another player to argue with. Combined it doesn't make your cases believable. Anybody that disagrees with Palmar is scum. And I'm really hoping your advice to not do PBP was a joke. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 20 2011 23:38 chaos13 wrote: We're gonna derp ourselves into a useless no-lynch today if this keeps up. This thread is a mess. I'm not sure on who thinks what of who any more because things are so muddled up with accusations everywhere and a complete lack of clarity in communication. Again, who started this? Palmar. Let's take a brief look at the sevryn bandwagon. Did it build up quickly? Has there been any noticeable defense that appears flimsy or false or nervous? I don't think he's scum. Jackal, who do you think is mafia and why? Palmar. He's playing his "I'm so town it hurts" persona he had in PTP2. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
I have reread all of Sevryns posts and I don't see anything as being particularly scummy in them. What I don't like is his disappearance when the heat began to be turned up on him. I still think Palmar is scum but I'm pretty sure I can't convince anybody of that atm so I'm going to vote for the guy he give .2% chance of being scum. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 21 2011 05:34 Foolishness wrote: Man this is a touch choice Which choice is that? I'm unvoting Sevryn. As I previously stated he has not set off any bells with what he had posted but by his disappearance. How much time is remaining? | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 15 2011 04:58 RayzorFlash wrote: /in ... My first Mafia game, but I've been doing the research and it seems fun :D Somebody is being coached. + Show Spoiler + On August 19 2011 09:44 RayzorFlash wrote: It does seem highly strange and suspicious that in a game full of lurkers, he's gone above and beyond to draw attention to himself... On August 19 2011 09:56 RayzorFlash wrote: It would be very easy for scum to abide by the "three post a day" criteria if they wanted to... I just don't think it would be that effective, because just based on the sheer number of new people, and the ratio of scum-to-townie, there are inevitably going to be a lot of townies in the lurker list, and wasting town KPs on them would only make it easier for the scum... On August 19 2011 13:42 RayzorFlash wrote: I said in my previous post how having us waste KPs on lurkers would further scum agenda, and thats why I think the actions seem suspicious, especially considering that we know there are a lot of new players here, and scum do too. New players generally have more a tendency to lurk, or become inactive, and thus, if we put together a lurker list, there WILL be a fairly large amount of people on it. This is especially true if they're townies or blues, as if they're mafia they will try their hardest to stay OFF that list... I think its NOT a good idea to just declare that everyone start killing off lurkers, unless there is actually a REASON to kill them, not just because they're lurking. Its a double-edged sword for sure, it does make the cultists come out and have to participate, which might reveal them, but it also runs the risk of killing a lot of townies... If we want to put together a lurker list, by all means do it, I just hope we exercise a little bit of restraint and use the kills given good reasons, since we don't want to make this EASIER for the mafia On August 20 2011 01:40 RayzorFlash wrote: Your post seemed like obvious scum to me, the scummiest post so far, and I will most likely be away for the rest of the day so I put in a vote against you... I'll check back later and see if I have to change it, but I doubt if I will :p On August 20 2011 13:32 RayzorFlash wrote: I'm sticking with my vote on Sevryn unless something ridiculously obvious jumps out in the next 24 hours... I think by far that he has had the scummiest behaviour, both in terms of the vote, and then the defensive roll-back after he was called out on it... I'm hesitant on Palmar just because he's been creating a far from ideal first Day in here... He contributed the main talking point sure, but his argument for that talking point was very weak... However, Dropbear has definitely acted a bit suspicious and got overly defensive, and the mayor idea seems scummy because he recommended himself for it right off the bat... Those 3 seem like the major suspects this first day... I think (at least) ONE of Palmar or DropBear is definitely a scum, and if we start nearing a majority on either of them I will switch my vote from Sevryn and get him at a later date... I am most definitely voting for one of those 3 though On August 21 2011 04:55 RayzorFlash wrote: Supersoft, you seem to be trying wayyyy too hard to get Sevryn not lynched... Since the start you've tried putting up 3-4 different reasons to direct the vote away from Sevryn, first with a weak defense, then when called out on the defense being wishywashy, you quickly backtracked on it and said that you were just pointing out how anyone could have done that, and immediately started pressuring Xtfftc. While Xtfftc has definitely acted suspiciously, I see it as more suspicious that you (and Palmar, to a degree) were the two who along with Sevryn caused the pressure-vote issue at the start of the game anyway, and that you (and Palmar, to a degree  ) are working so hard to get attention away from Sevryn and on to other people.At this point, I would expect scum to just leave Sev to defend himself since they wouldnt want to get caught defending him, and try to either set-up a subsequent lynch away from them, or try to redirect attention away from him entirely. Town right now loses NOTHING by lynching Sev. If he flips red, we immediately know who to go after next, i.e. the people defending him, or the people trying to get someone else lynched first. If he flips green, we can target the ones who have most aggressively tried to get him lynched. Its a win-win situation. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 21 2011 06:59 Palmar wrote: i'd be totally down with lynching RayzorFlash You're totally down with lynching everybody. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On August 21 2011 07:15 Pyo wrote: I'm confused. What do you mean by this? What exactly has changed that would warrant you changing your vote? The only thing I can see is that he's received the critical mass to actually have a lynch so he'll get lynched even if you change your vote. Are you trying to cover your tracks for if/when he flips green? I don't believe him to be scum. | ||
| ||
