EPTTL Mafia L
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
| ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
| ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
LOL I won't vote for Kitaman after XLVIII's disaster. He was an absolute derp in that. Waiting for people to put in a serious campaign with a decent policy. This is why I'm waiting for Mr. Wiggles and Cyber_Cheese to provide us with good reasons; and right now, Wiggles has the best campaign of the lot. I of course wonder if Sandroba or Palmar will try to get to the elections again. | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
On January 13 2012 14:56 Protactinium wrote: I'm running for mayor on the platform of lynching Ciryandor. There's no way you seriously think Mr. Wiggles has the best campaign. LOL that's a good reason to get you voted in. Lynching someone for having an opinion. | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
On January 13 2012 15:29 GGQ wrote: Your posts have been very bad so far. This post is also bad. LOL says the guy whose first post is to criticize bad posts. In a more productive light, where is Bill? Does he actually want to be mayor? I'm starting to wonder why Foolishness is pushing for him to be mayor. Are there any other candidates besides Kita and Wiggles that want to step up? I realize that it's only the third hour or so from game's start, so we'll probably have activity pick up in the next nine or so from EU people waking up. | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
On January 13 2012 16:06 Erandorr wrote: Hey Cyriandor, could you put some more thoughts into your posts please? Foolishness has given all the reasons why he thinks that BM should be elected mayor. You can argue with his reasons but what you wrote is just plain terrible. The game has gone on for one hour so basicly you managed to say a whole lot of absolutely nothing again. @ Bum: What was that? What I am asking is where Bill is, and what he has to say about Foolishness giving some good reasons for him to become Mayor. The question is directed at Bill, who isn't here right now. Is it wrong to ask the guy somebody else is pushing to become mayor what he thinks of this, and if he wants to be in that position? It's a legitimate question after all; I should be asking you why you it's not a good question to actually doubt Foolishness' motives in proposing Bill's as well? | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
Some reads on players of interest: I honestly think GGQ has just as bad a posting history as mine, and that he has escaped scrutiny by creating an FoS on me just because I was asking why I should be believing the early candidates like Cyber_Cheese instead of Mr. Wiggles during that time. I also can't blame Protactinium for thinking I'm bad as well with my responses, but I wouldn't vote for him just because he thinks BC is scum, and he hasn't buttressed that argument since. As far as I've read, I think BC has townie interests at heart and is in the usual situation with leading mayor candidates, having a hard time justifying what he would do with the position beyond the Day 1 lynch power, but a point against him as well is that he has not delivered his mason partner, which he had decided to reveal in one of his posts. Also, risk.nuke being suddenly defensive after some criticism of him making a half hearted push for mayor is IMO very newbie townie play, or a scum being baited to attract others' attention to him. This should be noted as I think risk is noob town who does not know how to defend his positions properly. Just a question, where is Kurumi? At least sandroba has posted even if he thinks I'm scummy for asking if he's running, and Palmar has said he doesn't really care now about the vote; which is uncharacteristically sour of him. I read Palmar as trolling town more than scum because of that, as he would have probably given a token "I support someone because they're worth trusting" post (as that could influence newbies/lurkers) who see people commenting at him being a veteran voting that way at the very least if he were scum. Finally, I have to note that Bill's post that it is likely we have a scum candidate among the front-runners leads me to think we should actually do a vote-swing to a random strong candidate, and that the votes for that person should come from people who have already voted, as IMO it is more likely for scum to have delayed voting to have more influence over the result in a close race and not waste votes in a throw-away push for their candidate if a runaway win were to happen. Right now I'm torn between Proact and Sandroba in voting, because at least they're concrete in promising ONE NAME to lynch instead of being wishy-washy in getting a list of targets up, and that I think they have plans for town after Day 1 that don't need to be publicized yet. | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
On January 15 2012 12:03 kitaman27 wrote: Sorry guys, the OP has the incorrect deadline and I was catching up on the thread thinking I would have more time. I'm around page 62, but I'm voting BM because he is the strongest town read I have at the moment of the post. I'll try to post when I finish reading. Can the OP be updated with the correct deadline? Same thing here; I only read the blue post saying 9 minutes to deadline with 4 minutes to go, so I just chucked in a vote at Bill seeing that Proact is in the lead (as of the last votecount update I saw), and that I don't like BC to get sheriff because he and Proact are at odds with each other. As for the comment on lynching, Proact, even if he has changed targets, at least is not being wishy-washy by giving a list of choices, he is at least committing to a specific person to lynch. | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
On January 15 2012 12:35 Toadesstern wrote: So a miller is a townie right? Awesome, made 2 calls and everyone else said I'm wrong, yet I ended up being right. At least I don't have to replace the green color I did for palmar with something else. Screw you guys I'm going to bed. Yes, Miller is townie that checks as scum. | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
 | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
On January 24 2012 14:47 flamewheel wrote: But really, the Mafia were really uncoordinated. They have very few posts in their QT, there were only ever one or two people online in their IRC channel, and BM messaged me I think last night asking "who are our kills?" This I also think was a major failing on the scumteam's part, I was quite disappointed that I wasn't hearing anyone in the scum team really establish a base-line to attack Proact/Foolish/WBG; and that even though we had a veteran core and we had a couple of "throwaway" plays in me and Macpo early on, the team just felt too disjointed and didn't want to take risks in going for an advantage over town. On January 24 2012 14:50 bumatlarge wrote: The most damning thing by far was the lack of communication. I never had a single conversation with L, Bill practically refused to talk in IRC and quicktopic beyond the first day, and sandroba came back drunk EVERY SINGLE DAY. And these are the "good" players on our team. I am dissappoint. I forgot to set a roleblocker and framer ngiht 2 (we were lucky i sent in kills). We would have been having a hell of a game our team decided to talk to each other. Shworz was a good player, i have no idea what happened to him yesterday. nisani and opz dont talk in the thread, even when they are active on irc :/ but at least they were talking with me. Yet it was fun. thanks for the game FW and Jcarl  This generally confirms how I felt about the whole thing. For a guy that was playing on his 5th game, I felt like the stupidest of the lot, even on the first day stuff, and it didn't help that I had things to do that weekend before I got killed. I also keep playing a scum-like game, somebody PM me on how I should be approaching D1 discussion in these big games because I'll probably end up always reacting like scum simply because I'm the sort to fish for reactions, not solicit accusations.  | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
On January 24 2012 15:00 bumatlarge wrote: fine you get the three scum masons next game. I'll be scum jack I feel that scum Jack is worth 2 masons, but masons are wildly variable in power levels anyway (there are times they can be useless, sometimes they can be worth multiple DTs, depending on who has them and who they're used on), but jacks are much more stable in power level because they're fixed in what they can provide, and I'll take that stability instead. | ||
| ||
