EPTI only played RL mafia before, but after seeing this pregame chat, i've got the urge to join this game.
TL Mafia L
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
I only played RL mafia before, but after seeing this pregame chat, i've got the urge to join this game. | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
 | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
On January 10 2012 20:55 Forumite wrote: Your filter works perfectly. Click the link named "filter", in your post or prplhz´s list. look at my posting time and his last edit time  Also, more german here  | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
am I doing it right? | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
On January 11 2012 00:22 Toadesstern wrote: nooo, you need to give your dayvig power to someone else to pick the target instead of just picking a target yourself to prove you're not a mafia! What sense is there in picking a target yourself? That's not telling us a thing about your alignment at all. You probably want to look like a townie so you should have tried to pick someone who's good at shooting townies, like V7, Palmar or myself. + Show Spoiler + yeah I'm bored, we need to start this game RIGHT NAO but, but, i needed to taste his blood on my own hands .... | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
| ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
On January 13 2012 19:34 EchelonTee wrote: How is meapak criticizing Nissani, an easy lynch, a characteristic of a VI? This is an honest question because I just don't see it. Regardless, I don't think there are any 3rd party roles. Yeah, there aren't, I checked. I actually agree with your assessment on Nissani... I don't think it's a super strong town tell, but yah. I dont understand how a random one line criticism of all candidates followed by a one liner explanation is a good town tell. On January 13 2012 19:44 Adam4167 wrote: The officials do, sure. But if they're dead, how will they tell us who the bodyguards were that failed to protect them? I still think it's a big risk to use mafia as bodyguards. If the elected are protted and still get shot at and survives, we know the bodyguards are mafia. So this rule just forces the medics to prot the elected roles. is it possible to add the filter of the players to the player list, akin to link? | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
You randomly propose to lynch bumatlarge after agreeing with his analysis? And also where is the supposed analysis of bum? Adam has not posted anything that makes him strongly pro town imo, he starts a discussion about bodyguards when we dont even have a consensus on who should be elected mayor. Protactinium has only one post, which is quite trolling, so null read right now. Your posts make you quite suspicious in my eyes. Also, you edited your last post ... | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
| ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
On January 14 2012 01:18 Palmar wrote: Hey I agree with this guy, so I'm voting him. I am very much a fan of killing Ciryandor. What is it with Ciryandor? Palmar, are you now trolling us? I agree with Toadesstern that a) you are mafia and dont care about the game or b) you have a special tactic, but randomly accusing him does not help .. Wiggles: Does your post mean you are stepping down as candidate? On that topic, could all people that are serious in their campaign make it clear? For me, right now there are: BC, BM(?), kitaman and risk.nuke. I think the number of candidates has to be limited to enable a clearer choice. | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
I was just commenting on your playstyle. I was just following the meta on you (town=vocal, scum=lurking), but seeing as you were quite active as "scum" in resistance, I retract my statement. But still posting one-liners is not helping much, no? | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
| ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
I am a new player, so I can imagine that good scum team can manipulate a inexperienced player, but he will probably only influence the game with his single vote (if he's green), so I can see why masons staying hidden is advantageous for town. Also, since I got ignored the first time, why is there so much hate towards Ciry? I dont think his posts are very scummy, but there are 3 people (sandroba, proactinium and sheth) pushing for his lynch. I also dont think this alone is a scumtell, but its still pretty irritatiting .. | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
| ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
rgTheSchworz: quite aggressive; uses all caps; promises to deal with gcq, but does not folow up; FOSes palmar, but says to wait till day 2 to lynch him, asks others to do the behavioral analysis while saying it is only a few posts, so it should be quick (so why didnt you do it yourself?). list of people he wanted to lynch and didnt follow up on: protactinium (even supported him for promising to kill ciry), bumatlarge, ciry consistent candidates: risk.nuke (but lately he seemed to have switched to macpo) and macpo. He also says that sandroba breadcrumbed blue, followed by saying sandro is suspicious. His play is certainly inconsistent, I'm not sure if he is scum (because I give him the benefit of the doubt as newbie), but I would agree with a lynch on him if he doesnt change his play. sandroba: has actively pushed for ciry lynch, promises to not lynch any vet, proceeds to lynch palmar anyway. His targets for day 2 are ggq, jackal and iceman, all three have not been very active/contributed few things. Leaning scum, but not sure. scamp: becomes very active when being accused, aggressive/dismissive. Still, null read for me right now. ggq: posts quite aggressive and short, but wherebugsgo and palmar made similar posts. I leaned scum, but null read right now. Note to self: I shouldnt only look into players that are aggressive .. There are other players that have been accused, but I I havent made up my mind on them yet. | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
On January 17 2012 01:58 sandroba wrote: Alright gotta go with GGQ. He is doing his usual scum meta which is popping in from time to time with short messages that don't explain shit. Not only that but most of them is actively spread doubt without trying to gather any support from others on his "beliefs". This is something that makes absolutely no sense from a town player to do, but fits mafia behavior quite nicely. Mafia wants to be ignored while putting in seeds of doubt in peoples head that are hard to trace back to the original source. And that's GGQ's play. He is mafia. ##Vote: GGQ He isnt as disruptive as you want to make us believe he is. He is essentially doing the same thing palmar has done, i.e. shitting on plays that he thinks are bad. That doesnt make him the most pleasant to work with, but still no scum. | ||
|
Chaosquo
Germany154 Posts
On January 17 2012 02:15 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Is it just me, or is that some timing? Just as Sandroba decides GGQ as his vote It took me some time to write the post before that, and then I refreshed and saw the post by sandroba and felt his argument for pushing ggq was quite weak and I didnt want palmar happening again. BAM! SOFTDEFEND So I took a look at Chaosquo's Filter 1 - Protects Ciryandor multiple times. Look at the thread at that time. Ciry only made three meaningful posts at that time and non seemed very scummy. I didnt understand the accusation protactinium and sandroba were making, it didnt have much grounds imo. I thought that this accusation got seemingly randomly picked up by different people (Sheth comemntated on it later), which left me pretty confused, so I wanted to hear a stronger case. 2 - Casts doubt on both Palmar. I just said that what palmar was doing is questionable, and I wanted him to step up the posting to avoid getting lynched. 3 - And Wiggles 4 - Apologetic That was after I looked into his other game and I felt the meta argument was overdone. 5 - Calls attention to his inexperience And I was trying to reinforce the point that I that believe mafia masons can manipulate town. ##Vote Chaosquo | ||
| ||
