• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:45
CEST 13:45
KST 20:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature4Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy15
Community News
LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments2Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris54Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!15
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Production Quality - Maestros of the Game Vs RSL 2 Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me)
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies
Brood War
General
The Korean Terminology Thread BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: herO's Baffling Game ASL20 General Discussion BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info! Is there English video for group selection for ASL Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
Collective Intelligence: Tea…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 750 users

TL Mafia XLIII

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 01 2011 03:43 GMT
#14
/in!
awwwwwyeahhhh.jpg

(shame about PMs though)
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 01 2011 19:54 GMT
#90
sup boys
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 02 2011 01:04 GMT
#196
i don't like relying on roles, particularly in a semi-closed setup. still, it's a tempting plan despite its flaws, and heist is making the most sense here. delaying the plan a night or two is better for several reasons. first, to execute the plan we have to do essentially a double lynch, which usually doesn't have value day 1. second, with night action history, the dayvig will be able to make a better decision, post-claims.

the hate against redff and drh is ill-advised, i think. their concerns are legitimate. drh is doing a better job of voicing them though.

also
heist wrote
The heart of the matter is whether having a confirmed townie earlier is worth the risk of a less accurate vig shot. And the advantages are great, someone who can potentially point out suspicious claims, coordinate actions, provide a safe outlet for DT checks, etc

those advantages don't exist if you're debating doing this plan day1 vs day2. in both cases, the person will be able to point out suspicious claims, coordinate actions, provide safe outlet for dt checks, just a day later. these advantages only exist if you're debating doing this plan vs not doing it at all.
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 02 2011 16:41 GMT
#232
pressure votes are stupid, where did this trend come from? you know when you say "yeah this is a pressure vote", that's pretty much equivalent to "idk who to vote so i'm voting you, but i'm not actually suspicious of you because all you need to do is say something and i'll remove my vote from you".
nobody can seriously feel threatened from a pressure vote, so there's no 'pressure' it's just a throwaway vote
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 02 2011 17:41 GMT
#235
On August 03 2011 02:09 Mig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 03 2011 01:41 JeeJee wrote:
pressure votes are stupid, where did this trend come from? you know when you say "yeah this is a pressure vote", that's pretty much equivalent to "idk who to vote so i'm voting you, but i'm not actually suspicious of you because all you need to do is say something and i'll remove my vote from you".
nobody can seriously feel threatened from a pressure vote, so there's no 'pressure' it's just a throwaway vote


JeeJee you are correct on this point but what exactly does pointing it out contribute? You have 2 posts and both of them while correct are bland and useless. You commented on pressure votes and neglected to comment on whether you actually thought varp was scummy or not.

Who do you think is scum? What do you think about the 2 leading candidates varp/red?


it points out the fact that sandro's vote isn't a real vote. apparently not everybody realizes that pressure votes are a joke.

i think both of those candidates are a stupid idea. red is being ragged on due to him opposing a tempting plan, but not one without faults. his concerns are legitimate. claiming over-defensiveness as a scum-tell is something i particularly dislike, having been lynched for it multiple times as a townie. further, the people pushing him are useless people like minii who just jump on the hate with zero reasoning whatsoever.

the extent of minii's posts are as follows:
On August 02 2011 16:26 youngminii wrote:
fairly certain redff is scum
he's playing exactly like that other game where i was scum with him
i'm sorry red but your scum play is so obvious

Fin.


varp is being ragged on due to wishy-washness. i just re-read his posts, and the tldr progression is as follows
-vigi dont shoot on hunches
-be active
-no problems re dayvig plan
-realizes its better to delay or outright not do the plan due to stacked hits
-random fos on trotske

i see re-evaluation there, not wishy-washiness. do you see otherwise? random fos are just as useless as pressure votes. sandro and varp are both bad in that department as far as i'm concerned. by itself though, it doesn't mean much, and there's nothing else yet.

as for me, i don't have scum leanings on anyone. town leans yes, scum leans no.
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 03 2011 00:30 GMT
#343
hi drazerk, how are you?
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 03 2011 03:30 GMT
#353
looks like cobbles picked up on the same thing i have. what particularly irks me about drazerk today is that he has been posting in the other mafia thread on his usual time of 5-10kst +/-1hr so he has been reading this thread as well. but he declined to weigh in, leaving his vote as-is (essentially throwaway). didnt even answer a simple "how are you" =(

usually when people say 'lurking is a scumtell', i disagree because they clump 'afk' and 'lurk' as interchangeable. afking means nothing as far as i'm concerned, just look at ace in snmm5. lurking (ie being there but not speaking) a la drazerk is a different story.

still not voting, but i'll be here before the deadline tomorrow, no worries.
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 03 2011 03:42 GMT
#354
actually screw it let's get the ball rolling.
anyone disagree with drazerk as a candidate?
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 03 2011 20:14 GMT
#407
On August 04 2011 02:18 TheAwesomeAll wrote:
why is the amount of votes on a person a reason? rather vote on real scum like jeejee.

On August 04 2011 03:34 TheAwesomeAll wrote:
Ok JeeJee, since you are probably not going to get lynched im going to hit you tonight. Unless you can convince me of your own innocence, and someone else's scummyness (yes im trigger happy)


reading is a useful talent toi have.

On August 04 2011 03:34 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
shinbi had no scum leanings, then in 10 hours without posting serious reasons he sheeps onto something I say to try and force a bandwagon on a player? Not only that, rather than push said bandwagon with any conviction, he makes his move then vanishes from the thread completely since.

As such, until he reappears to explain his actions I am throwing my vote there.

vote jeejee


i sheeped on you? that's news to me, considering i was the first one to bring up drazerk.

i still think the case against varp is terrible. it's pretty much equivalent to redff's case, which is equally bad. drazerk is still deliberately avoiding this thread while posting in others but sadly not enough people care. seems to be off to a wonderful start.
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 03 2011 20:25 GMT
#409
you can't be serious
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 03 2011 21:38 GMT
#416
oh lawd.
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 03 2011 22:36 GMT
#431
lol, i was planning to go with http://www.nelsonhaha.com/ @ minii post-flip

surprising, although the flip doesn't make the argument against varp any less shitty
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 03 2011 22:39 GMT
#433
no, i don't. perhaps your majesty can enlighten me.

as far as i see, it's the same argument as was against redff, except with pointless meta thrown in. correct me?
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 03 2011 22:57 GMT
#443
On August 04 2011 07:51 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
why are you being so antagonistic jeejee? we found a scum yet you're still basically opposing his lynch. there were reasons don't try to discredit this it wasn't all luck


how am i being antagonistic and to whom?
yeah, there were reasons for his lynch, but they weren't good ones. your analysis is marred by results. if he had flipped town you'd be "oh well they weren't the best of reasons but its day one anyway". the reasons you listed apply to redff just as much
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 03 2011 23:10 GMT
#446
On August 04 2011 07:59 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
No, I would have said he played scummy as hell because he did. Right away from his first post I thought "ok that looks like scum posturing" and he continued that throughout the whole thread. They weren't objective reasons, that's not what drives scumhunting it's about understanding what scum try to accomplish and how they do it differently than town and he had all the warning signs man


k i hope you mistyped objective/subjective but if not..

if you do your scumhunting subjectively how do you expect others to agree? that's the dumbest thing i've ever heard. you state a behaviour and an objective interpretation/reasoning for it. not go with your hunches.
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 04 2011 02:45 GMT
#506
oh ghrur you're so amusing. i'd do a rebuttal but everything you wrote is so pointless, it works as its own rebuttal! hurrah.
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 05 2011 00:19 GMT
#578
On August 05 2011 08:29 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Ok, to start with I believe of the remaining 3 scum, jeejee is one of them. I say this for a few reasons. He defended Varpulis. However, he didn’t commit to this defense, he posted one near the very beginning of the bandwagon on him then never touched on the issue once it became a solid lynch. His defense of varpulis

Show nested quote +
On August 03 2011 02:41 JeeJee wrote:
On August 03 2011 02:09 Mig wrote:
On August 03 2011 01:41 JeeJee wrote:
pressure votes are stupid, where did this trend come from? you know when you say "yeah this is a pressure vote", that's pretty much equivalent to "idk who to vote so i'm voting you, but i'm not actually suspicious of you because all you need to do is say something and i'll remove my vote from you".
nobody can seriously feel threatened from a pressure vote, so there's no 'pressure' it's just a throwaway vote


JeeJee you are correct on this point but what exactly does pointing it out contribute? You have 2 posts and both of them while correct are bland and useless. You commented on pressure votes and neglected to comment on whether you actually thought varp was scummy or not.

Who do you think is scum? What do you think about the 2 leading candidates varp/red?


it points out the fact that sandro's vote isn't a real vote. apparently not everybody realizes that pressure votes are a joke.

i think both of those candidates are a stupid idea. red is being ragged on due to him opposing a tempting plan, but not one without faults. his concerns are legitimate. claiming over-defensiveness as a scum-tell is something i particularly dislike, having been lynched for it multiple times as a townie. further, the people pushing him are useless people like minii who just jump on the hate with zero reasoning whatsoever.

the extent of minii's posts are as follows:
On August 02 2011 16:26 youngminii wrote:
fairly certain redff is scum
he's playing exactly like that other game where i was scum with him
i'm sorry red but your scum play is so obvious

Fin.


varp is being ragged on due to wishy-washness. i just re-read his posts, and the tldr progression is as follows
-vigi dont shoot on hunches
-be active
-no problems re dayvig plan
-realizes its better to delay or outright not do the plan due to stacked hits
-random fos on trotske

i see re-evaluation there, not wishy-washiness. do you see otherwise? random fos are just as useless as pressure votes. sandro and varp are both bad in that department as far as i'm concerned. by itself though, it doesn't mean much, and there's nothing else yet.

as for me, i don't have scum leanings on anyone. town leans yes, scum leans no.


Note that rather than draw emphasis to the posts of those accusing varpulis, or any of varps posts he just sums the series of posts varp made up. I would normally say that this is a moot point, however he did opt to find it worth quoting posts in relation to redff. Why would you defend two people within one post but only bring attention to specific posts on one bandwagon? Possibly moot, but definitely not normal.

minii was hating on red, not varp. if he were hating on varp, i'd have put him in the varp category. it doesn't matter who he is hating when the hate is ill-founded given that he hasn't provided any reasons for it

His next post is 7 hours later saying Hi to drazerk. Followed by 3 hours later appearing to take off on a post that I had made an hour before his post.

actually it was asking drazerk a question, showing that he is indeed avoiding the thread, even questions directly addressed to him that can be answered in five seconds

Show nested quote +
On August 03 2011 12:30 JeeJee wrote:
looks like cobbles picked up on the same thing i have. what particularly irks me about drazerk today is that he has been posting in the other mafia thread on his usual time of 5-10kst +/-1hr so he has been reading this thread as well. but he declined to weigh in, leaving his vote as-is (essentially throwaway). didnt even answer a simple "how are you" =(

usually when people say 'lurking is a scumtell', i disagree because they clump 'afk' and 'lurk' as interchangeable. afking means nothing as far as i'm concerned, just look at ace in snmm5. lurking (ie being there but not speaking) a la drazerk is a different story.

still not voting, but i'll be here before the deadline tomorrow, no worries.



This post is the first one that seriously tries to move a bandwagon away from varpulis. This is done by first using my name as a “backup” as well as using a lot of out of thread reasoning. He then refuses to vote as he will be around for the deadline. Moments later he makes a post saying screw it, and votes. Now, as someone who mentioned early in the thread he doesn’t believe in pressure voting, we know that this vote is meant to be solid “I believe this person is scum”. We also know that as of roughly 10 hours before he voted he had no scum leanings on any player. How is it that someone who has been moderately inactive much like himself, is suddenly sure of the guilt of another player when his reasoning is “inactivity in this thread but active outside of it” He couldn’t find anything in thread? Or in irc to help.

because it's actually pretty damn scummy when someone is reading the thread but refusing to weigh-in, particularly when his arguments were all shot down and he is throwing away his vote, with the deadline looming. i can't believe you said they weren't serious reasons

He then spends the next bit of time after the lynch to accuse players of bad logic, spam, and refusal to even defend himself from general accusations. He attacks my accusation that I made of him by saying “I brought him up first” when all he had done previously was say “hi how are you” to drazerk.

Overall he has had 17-18 posts all game where a fair majority of them have been spam or generally unhelpful / noncommittal.

the general accusations against me were bad, why would i acknowledge them? like i said, i've been lynched for being overly defensive before. apparently shutting down arguments that nobody can possibly believe is more scummy than just ignoring them.



responses in bold/red.

as for claims,i think it's a good idea. unless you just happen to have a reasonable explanation for the missing KP. hell, even if mig's mafia, he can't just kill off all blues and hope nobody notices -- and him dying would cut mafia kp in half.

lucid/red are being unreasonable imo. yeah nothing is 100%, but it's much more likely mig being town than mafia
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 05 2011 01:34 GMT
#595
On August 05 2011 09:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 09:19 JeeJee wrote:
On August 05 2011 08:29 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Ok, to start with I believe of the remaining 3 scum, jeejee is one of them. I say this for a few reasons. He defended Varpulis. However, he didn’t commit to this defense, he posted one near the very beginning of the bandwagon on him then never touched on the issue once it became a solid lynch. His defense of varpulis

On August 03 2011 02:41 JeeJee wrote:
On August 03 2011 02:09 Mig wrote:
On August 03 2011 01:41 JeeJee wrote:
pressure votes are stupid, where did this trend come from? you know when you say "yeah this is a pressure vote", that's pretty much equivalent to "idk who to vote so i'm voting you, but i'm not actually suspicious of you because all you need to do is say something and i'll remove my vote from you".
nobody can seriously feel threatened from a pressure vote, so there's no 'pressure' it's just a throwaway vote


JeeJee you are correct on this point but what exactly does pointing it out contribute? You have 2 posts and both of them while correct are bland and useless. You commented on pressure votes and neglected to comment on whether you actually thought varp was scummy or not.

Who do you think is scum? What do you think about the 2 leading candidates varp/red?


it points out the fact that sandro's vote isn't a real vote. apparently not everybody realizes that pressure votes are a joke.

i think both of those candidates are a stupid idea. red is being ragged on due to him opposing a tempting plan, but not one without faults. his concerns are legitimate. claiming over-defensiveness as a scum-tell is something i particularly dislike, having been lynched for it multiple times as a townie. further, the people pushing him are useless people like minii who just jump on the hate with zero reasoning whatsoever.

the extent of minii's posts are as follows:
On August 02 2011 16:26 youngminii wrote:
fairly certain redff is scum
he's playing exactly like that other game where i was scum with him
i'm sorry red but your scum play is so obvious

Fin.


varp is being ragged on due to wishy-washness. i just re-read his posts, and the tldr progression is as follows
-vigi dont shoot on hunches
-be active
-no problems re dayvig plan
-realizes its better to delay or outright not do the plan due to stacked hits
-random fos on trotske

i see re-evaluation there, not wishy-washiness. do you see otherwise? random fos are just as useless as pressure votes. sandro and varp are both bad in that department as far as i'm concerned. by itself though, it doesn't mean much, and there's nothing else yet.

as for me, i don't have scum leanings on anyone. town leans yes, scum leans no.


Note that rather than draw emphasis to the posts of those accusing varpulis, or any of varps posts he just sums the series of posts varp made up. I would normally say that this is a moot point, however he did opt to find it worth quoting posts in relation to redff. Why would you defend two people within one post but only bring attention to specific posts on one bandwagon? Possibly moot, but definitely not normal.

minii was hating on red, not varp. if he were hating on varp, i'd have put him in the varp category. it doesn't matter who he is hating when the hate is ill-founded given that he hasn't provided any reasons for it

His next post is 7 hours later saying Hi to drazerk. Followed by 3 hours later appearing to take off on a post that I had made an hour before his post.

actually it was asking drazerk a question, showing that he is indeed avoiding the thread, even questions directly addressed to him that can be answered in five seconds

On August 03 2011 12:30 JeeJee wrote:
looks like cobbles picked up on the same thing i have. what particularly irks me about drazerk today is that he has been posting in the other mafia thread on his usual time of 5-10kst +/-1hr so he has been reading this thread as well. but he declined to weigh in, leaving his vote as-is (essentially throwaway). didnt even answer a simple "how are you" =(

usually when people say 'lurking is a scumtell', i disagree because they clump 'afk' and 'lurk' as interchangeable. afking means nothing as far as i'm concerned, just look at ace in snmm5. lurking (ie being there but not speaking) a la drazerk is a different story.

still not voting, but i'll be here before the deadline tomorrow, no worries.



This post is the first one that seriously tries to move a bandwagon away from varpulis. This is done by first using my name as a “backup” as well as using a lot of out of thread reasoning. He then refuses to vote as he will be around for the deadline. Moments later he makes a post saying screw it, and votes. Now, as someone who mentioned early in the thread he doesn’t believe in pressure voting, we know that this vote is meant to be solid “I believe this person is scum”. We also know that as of roughly 10 hours before he voted he had no scum leanings on any player. How is it that someone who has been moderately inactive much like himself, is suddenly sure of the guilt of another player when his reasoning is “inactivity in this thread but active outside of it” He couldn’t find anything in thread? Or in irc to help.

because it's actually pretty damn scummy when someone is reading the thread but refusing to weigh-in, particularly when his arguments were all shot down and he is throwing away his vote, with the deadline looming. i can't believe you said they weren't serious reasons

He then spends the next bit of time after the lynch to accuse players of bad logic, spam, and refusal to even defend himself from general accusations. He attacks my accusation that I made of him by saying “I brought him up first” when all he had done previously was say “hi how are you” to drazerk.

Overall he has had 17-18 posts all game where a fair majority of them have been spam or generally unhelpful / noncommittal.

the general accusations against me were bad, why would i acknowledge them? like i said, i've been lynched for being overly defensive before. apparently shutting down arguments that nobody can possibly believe is more scummy than just ignoring them.



responses in bold/red.

as for claims,i think it's a good idea. unless you just happen to have a reasonable explanation for the missing KP. hell, even if mig's mafia, he can't just kill off all blues and hope nobody notices -- and him dying would cut mafia kp in half.

lucid/red are being unreasonable imo. yeah nothing is 100%, but it's much more likely mig being town than mafia



I am glad that through all of this "defending" you still opt to not weigh in heavily on the current day. More to the point however you directly misread a section of what I posted against you.

Note that rather than draw emphasis to the posts of those accusing varpulis, or any of varps posts he just sums the series of posts varp made up. I would normally say that this is a moot point, however he did opt to find it worth quoting posts in relation to redff. Why would you defend two people within one post but only bring attention to specific posts on one bandwagon? Possibly moot, but definitely not normal.

minii was hating on red, not varp. if he were hating on varp, i'd have put him in the varp category. it doesn't matter who he is hating when the hate is ill-founded given that he hasn't provided any reasons for it


I had already implied the minii bit was in reference to red. The issue was that you were using posts to defend red whereas you were not using any to defend varp. It shows a "weak" and almost unmemorable defense of a mafia roleblocker.


As for your vote of drazerk. Is he lurking and inactive? yes. However, taking the opportunity to jump and appear to try and start a bandwagon when you yourself have also been fairly lurky and inactive is well odd. You then rather than actually give reasonable responses to most people questioning you at that period you opt to do small posts that provide next to nothing. Not only that, but you appear frequently enough to "comment" on the goings on of the thread but you never leave a lasting mark on anything. The posts are very neutral and if someone wasn't looking at you they were be unmemorable.

You are a much better player than this and as such should be more active or at least much more contributing than you are now.


are you being serious right now? the current day is three hours old.

again, you are misinterpreting what i said in the precise manner that i said you would. lurking isn't scummy if you clump afking and lurking as the same thing. i already said this yet you're doing it anyway? lurking by its intended definition is scummy. realize the difference between hiding and not being there. it's the same as the difference between lurking and afking. i never lurked. you insinuating that i did is laughable.

as for your last words, thanks but i don't deserve the rep i seem to have around here. every single game i played this year (except where i subbed in ccm) i have been mafia, where it's very easy to run along with the herd, half-hiding and never calling out anyone, and nobody notices. even if you fuck up, you have teammates to cover you. it takes no skill (imho). being townie is a whole other ballgame and i'm doing my best. i guess you don't remember the games where i was townie since they were so long ago, but i routinely got lynched in them =\ hopefully it wont happen here
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 05 2011 19:33 GMT
#645
On August 06 2011 02:37 Lucidity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 06 2011 01:32 Curu wrote:
On August 06 2011 01:31 Lucidity wrote:
That's simply not true. He "breadcrumbs" that he's going to kill X. X dies. Mafia killed X -.-


Then there's only 2 KP in the night and he's not confirmed Vig.

Herp.

Not true. Another Vig could have killed a 3rd player. Scum/Vigs could hit a Vet/Med protected player etc. The fact is there are too many variables to confirm the player at night.

your hypotheticals are a joke. sure a freak occurrence can happen where the vig doesn't become confirmed. the vast majority of the time, it will never happen. attempting to cast doubt on mig using that is silly, at least come up with something more reasonable.

to everyone else using meta arguments: meta's a joke. you keep calling me a veteran and saying i don't scumhunt, therefore i must be scum... you don't see a glaring flaw with that? lol


On August 06 2011 03:44 Mig wrote:
I was going to wait for chaos and sevryn to show up before I posted this but half way through and they are still awol so gonna post it so everyone can discuss.

One of JeeJee/Bc is pretty much guaranteed scum.

DrH, BC, JeeJee have all claimed medic to me. I talked with BC, ON and DrH who have experience hosting and the odds that there are 3 medics 1 vet in a 20 man game, even with 2 rbers, is virtually none. I trust DrH so I am fairly confident he is telling me the truth. So we can almost guarantee that one of BC/JeeJee is lying. The case against JeeJee is much stronger I believe. He A) defended Varp right after I made the first case against him B) he put virtually 0 effort into contributing analysis and scum hunting, yet when people call him out he comes in and defends himself strongly. So the current plan should be to lynch JeeJee and if he flips red we can try to work out the best plan for the medics, probably something like one defends me one defends the other medic.

Assuming JeeJee flips red then the other 2 scum are very likely between YM/Chaos/Sevryn/Lucid


sigh, some people say i ignore accusations against myself, others say i defend myself too much. make up your mind. anyway i trust you'll adjust your judgment post-flip. just remember what we talked about and avoid tunnel vision.
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
August 05 2011 19:33 GMT
#646
@redff mig knows that. you have no reason to.
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 2: Group A
Cure vs Bunny
Creator vs Zoun
Crank 1147
Tasteless844
IndyStarCraft 186
Rex124
3DClanTV 47
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 1147
Tasteless 844
IndyStarCraft 186
Rex 124
Codebar 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1173
firebathero 596
Larva 568
sSak 360
Mini 287
Zeus 258
Hyuk 251
JulyZerg 226
Last 225
ToSsGirL 224
[ Show more ]
Pusan 198
Light 160
ggaemo 160
TY 90
Hyun 86
Aegong 69
sas.Sziky 39
Sea.KH 38
Free 34
Movie 24
Icarus 20
Noble 19
JYJ19
scan(afreeca) 19
Shine 19
Hm[arnc] 4
Britney 0
Dota 2
The International91046
Gorgc13083
Fuzer 365
XcaliburYe206
Counter-Strike
x6flipin701
zeus11
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King51
Westballz35
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor153
Other Games
singsing1409
B2W.Neo749
JimRising 340
DeMusliM242
MindelVK17
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 12
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• Noizen33
League of Legends
• Jankos944
Other Games
• WagamamaTV273
Upcoming Events
Maestros of the Game
5h 15m
Maru vs Lambo
herO vs ShoWTimE
BSL Team Wars
7h 15m
Team Hawk vs Team Sziky
Sparkling Tuna Cup
22h 15m
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 4h
The PondCast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Online Event
5 days
BSL Team Wars
5 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
BSL Team Wars
5 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
5 days
Maestros of the Game
6 days
Cosmonarchy
6 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
[BSL 2025] Weekly
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-02
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21: BSL Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
EC S1
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.