Coft?

Who?

no I'm talking about that I don't have that problem, and I don't think neither of the other forumposters has that problem. So the problem lies in your own pc or w/e

CuddlyCuteKitten

Sweden2647 Posts

January 04 2005 23:23 GMT

Hive tech makes baby jesus cry. T.T

Liquid`Ret

Netherlands4511 Posts

January 04 2005 23:39 GMT

On January 05 2005 06:00 vaj wrote:
I dont think it was one sided..
You could just see how hard TvZ on Nostalgia is.. The better gamer lost the game..

t>z nostalgia but this zerg managed to get to lategame with a bit of gas and lategame it's a zerg favored map. but 9 out of 10 times terran wins within 15 min if he knows what hes doing ( sadist knows ) he just made a few mistakes dis game, which resulted in an entertaining rep so i'm not complaining

GroT

Belgium3003 Posts

January 05 2005 00:12 GMT

i have that too lumberjack, thought it was just me

Nal_Testie

Canada1257 Posts

January 05 2005 00:20 GMT

#10

T>Z Nostalgia?

What makes you think this?

Twisted

Netherlands13554 Posts

January 05 2005 00:24 GMT

#11

Yeah, I think it's pretty balanced -.-

Liquid`Ret

Netherlands4511 Posts

January 05 2005 00:42 GMT

#12

most of the time z will 2 hatch lurker, take his gas, at 1 point in the game, there is a time window in which terran can have some 24 marines or firebats some medics, 4 tanks vessel and marines are 1-1, at this point zerg has max 8 lurkers and lots of lings, probably 0-1. If terran know's what hes doing it's gg. either that or very hard for zerg.

if you're gonna fast expand turtle and take another main with a bunker ur not tvz'ing on nost the right way. (that's what I've seen u do testie)

LumberJack

United States3355 Posts

January 05 2005 00:45 GMT

#13

On January 05 2005 09:12 GroT wrote:
i have that too lumberjack, thought it was just me

well it worked normal until they switched over servers, i guess its some weird setting i dont know about

edit, hrm works normal in IE, but does the ASCII when i use firefox, funky

InFiNitY[pG]

Germany3474 Posts

January 05 2005 01:36 GMT

#14

just watch the nada vs chinese guy from WEG on nostalgia and you know how it's done

IdrA

United States11541 Posts

January 05 2005 01:47 GMT

#15

considering nada could have won that playing with one hand it isnt a great example.

Deleted User 3420

24492 Posts

January 05 2005 01:54 GMT

#16

i could destroy nada if we both played with 1 hand

Deleted User 3420

24492 Posts

January 05 2005 02:02 GMT

#17

i think the terran shoulda made more wraiths, first of all

LumberJack

United States3355 Posts

January 05 2005 02:08 GMT

#18

eh, nada is nada though, I think it goes back to that famous quote from pandolfini, ill paraphrase it, Most people play not to lose, Fischer played to win. I think its a classic comparison from american/euro macro style to korean. Koreans also play to 'not lose', too but they are much more aggressive about winning, they expect you to counter theirs,and then attack them, instead of just blocking the counter themselves, with better control/macro and then having an advantage. Their advantage is their aggressive style of always staying on top and pressing it. Nothing against sadist, hes better than i, im sure, but its apparent that he certainly played not to lose, with the REALLY late expos, and non-existant dropship harrassment, as well as using his entire army to kill the vast expos of zerg. There just isnt enough time on that map, to use ur whole army, too many areas to get flanked and caught in the open ground, too many areas for the zerg army to run and wait for a more opportune time to attack. But yes, the nada game is a great example oh how to play it, well.