EPTTL Mafia XXXVII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 20 2011 14:03 GMarshal wrote: So, I wasn't in Salem Mafia, can I ask what we exactly we are being punished for?  Sigh 5 godfather mafia team setup incoming -_- | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 21 2011 23:42 Conversion wrote: +1 + Show Spoiler + rank 92 in liquidbet with random votes, yeah! + Show Spoiler + My liquidbet dropped 400 spots due to khan fanboyism  On February 22 2011 00:43 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Hey guys think we can get to ten pages before the game starts? Only ten? You're not a very dedicated spammer. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 22 2011 05:00 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: This thread is getting so spamtastic I love it <3. What is our escape strategy if a mod comes in? Half the players and the hosts getting banned would sure crimp my style. Should we work on our excuses? + Show Spoiler + Oh no Mr. Modficcer I had no idea I was spamming + Show Spoiler + Sorry my post counter needs to be fixed I didn't realize I was double posting + Show Spoiler + I thought this was a no moderation zone I'm sorry Mr.Modficcer, that manipulative Meapak_Ziphh tricked me into doing it! | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 22 2011 06:53 Conversion wrote: hey I'm a new player  be nice to me!! Vote to lynch LSB, or I will vote to lynch you. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 22 2011 14:04 Mr. Wiggles wrote: It's a secret And if you solve the secret, it will lead to your killer why. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 23 2011 00:28 gryffindor wrote: game needs more elections! Lets rebel and organize a town run election! | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 10 2011 15:40 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Godfather: Night 1 mafia must choose their Godfather(s). The godfather(s) will then choose what role/alignment they will appear as for rest of the game. If not chosen will be RNG'd. The Godfather is worth 1KP. The existence of multiple godfathers is a strong possibility. Since a kp is tied to each of them, the chosen godfather(s) will probably keep a low profile, while the goons do their bidding. Dt's probably shouldn't claim to their target if they come up green/blue due to the possibility of multiple godfathers and the cover role. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 23 2011 13:03 Foolishness wrote: If any of you ever make a post that contains something along the lines of "I would like to hear from foolishness more...we all know he's an experienced player and I want to see what he thinks about the current situation" you can be sure that I will devote all my resources to finding a vigi/hatter to get you killed at night. Preemptively granting himself the ability to slide under the radar, while intimidating anyone who might want to try and call him out. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 23 2011 14:14 Coagulation wrote: is gryffindor bill murray? Careful, I asked him his identity and he proceeded to light me on fire last game On February 23 2011 14:21 Coagulation wrote: ya. Why the fuck would you claim vet day1? thats a pretty useless claim buddy. I'm vet too. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 23 2011 17:26 gryffindor wrote: Easily. It leads to the sharing of information, which the mafia need in this setup to properly use their abilities of role reversing the town into submission, as opposed to straight up kill power. If they know you are a Veteran, they can make you a PGO We don't need cells, we have claiming If you want scumhunting, do it yourself On February 23 2011 18:51 CubEdIn wrote: But yeah I don't think "cells" are a good idea. If you are sharing sensitive information, mafia may know a great deal of it. If you are not, then they don't really have much use. Using the thread for throwing around ideas is much more useful as it can uncover scum faster in case of a slip. PMs are a town weapon. The fact that multiple people are discouraging their use is concerning. Town should be able to extract information from mafia, not the other way around. You force the scum to give an opinion when you directly contact them 1:1. People complain that mafia have too much influence through PMs. How about you use that against them and identify the motives behind what they are saying instead? I don't like the idea of being told which two people I should talk to, but I certainly wouldn't advocate keeping all discussion in the thread. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 23 2011 23:42 gryffindor wrote: Actually, I disagree with you COMPLETELY, which is why i'm not only keeping you as my top scumread, but keeping my vote on you as well. The level of bullshit that you are trying to pervade into people's minds is astonishing. You, in a PM setup, are against claiming to people who are confirmed? How anti-town can you get? You then go onto say that I haven't provided any ways of confirmation, when we have Detectives, Vigilantes, and Medics. Detective checks we will have to take with a grain of salt, considering kill power vs lawyering/framing, but we will be able to judge that BASED on that kill power in and of itself, the vigilantes should be calling shots tomorrow on D2 for the 2nd night, earning medic protecting, and the medics should be able to whisper their saved players... all of these things can confirm people... problem? Suppose I'm a scum and I call out my "vig" shot on coag. I proceed to night hit coag, while reducing the mafia kp with the role abilities. A medic protects me and I start to receive a mass role claim because I am "confirmed". Yes, problem. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 24 2011 06:03 icemac wrote: Hey guys, just wanna post up in here. Let's have a good game . I'll post more later after I properly read all the posts 24 pages already t.tGame starts on page 14 if you want to save yourself some time. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 24 2011 09:32 GMarshal wrote: A post by post analysis of the contributions of annul (I know some people think post by post analysis are not good, but it works for me) The only reason to include every post is when your strongest points lack substance. If you are trying to "fluff" your argument then it probably means you came up with your verdict prior to analysis. On February 24 2011 09:32 GMarshal wrote: verdict = either aggressive scum or bad townie If his posts continue to be this poor then we may have no choice but to hang him I love "scum or town" verdicts. On February 24 2011 10:39 icemac wrote: Analysis doesn't mean shit Day 1. I don't see why you feel so compelled to pull stuff out of your ass and call it high level analysis. Quite aggressive for a newer player only making his third post. On February 24 2011 10:20 icemac wrote: Seems like shit's hitting the wall pretty hard without any real leads so far. Since its too early, why not just get a semi-active who is probably smart enough to keep their heads in the game but not smart enough to post big as a mafia. I guess this is ironic coming from me seeing as how I've just got up to date & posting. Who would you suggest? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
darmousseh (0 posts) JBright (0 posts) MaxwellE (0 posts, replacement) ICanFlyLow (0 posts) LSB (0 posts, claims to have a life outside the game, but I find that hard to believe) Beneather (1 post, apparently reading the last few pages for the last 6 hours) Barundar (1 post, claims to not be able to read the thread until tomorrow) astroorion (1 posts, declares that he is indeed alive) CubEdIn (2 posts) | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 23 2011 13:47 gryffindor wrote: This would get us raped by the role reverser, and is really a scummy idea unvote; ##Vote: GMarshal On February 23 2011 15:31 gryffindor wrote: Probably, but I'm still stuck on GMarshal's obviously scum-motivated plan On February 23 2011 17:26 gryffindor wrote: Easily. It leads to the sharing of information, which the mafia need in this setup to properly use their abilities of role reversing the town into submission, as opposed to straight up kill power. If they know you are a Veteran, they can make you a PGO We don't need cells, we have claiming If you want scumhunting, do it yourself On February 23 2011 23:42 gryffindor wrote: I'd also ask you to completely abandon any idea you have for "creating cells" when it is d1 in a large game in which we will get confirmed townies. On February 24 2011 20:42 gryffindor wrote: Deconduo, do you see how a scum could propose a cell idea? On February 24 2011 22:14 gryffindor wrote: Cell 1, Cell leader: Coagulation+ Show Spoiler + 1. 5. Jackal58 2. 17. astroorion 3. 1. Coagulation Cell 2, Cell leader: kitaman27+ Show Spoiler + 4. 19. Gofarman 5. 21. kitaman27 6. 12. icemac Cell 3, Cell leader: IDC, they're all competant+ Show Spoiler + 7. 6. Kenpachi 8. 2. LSB 9. 26. LunarDestiny Cell 4, Cell leader: Barundar+ Show Spoiler + 10. 30. LastArgument 11. 3. Barundar 12. 9. gryffindor Cell 5, Cell leader: deconduo+ Show Spoiler + 13. 16. ohN 14. 28. deconduo 15. 8. annul Cell 6, Cell leader: Foolishness+ Show Spoiler + 16. 18. Foolishness 17. 27. Ser Aspi 18. 22. kevconsim Cell 7, Cell leader: Seraph/Mr. Wiggles+ Show Spoiler + 19. 11. Beneather 20. 15. seRapH 21. 24. Mr. Wiggles Cell 8, Cell leader: OriginalName+ Show Spoiler + 22. 14. JBright 23. 23. ICanFlyLow 24. 13. OriginalName Cell 9, Cell leader: Chaoser+ Show Spoiler + 25. 7. darmousseh 26. 25. chaoser 27. 20. Conversion MaxwellE Cell 10, Cell leader: Cubedin+ Show Spoiler + 28. 4. CubEdIn 29. 29. why 30. 10. GMarshal Now, the "leader" to me is someone who needs to go out of their way to actually collaborate with the other people in their group. If you don't want to use my list of cells, and want to use GMarshal's, whatever. I have a good list I just made right here ready for us to use. Basically, the leaders need to go out of their way to make this work. I am fully confident in these peoples abilities to report what is going on within your cell, and to hold people accountable. You've got to be kidding me. You spend the first 24 hours attacking the plan, calling it scummy and building a case against GM and then the next day repost it with your own list of cells? All because you had an epiphany that the plan might no longer be so scummy afterall? The worst part of the plan was that GM picked which two people we should communicate with. The fact that you felt it necessary to revise the list with your own certainly concerns me. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 24 2011 10:59 GMarshal wrote: 2.) I'll retract that, thinking on it I'm convinced its just stupid townie On February 24 2011 00:11 GMarshal wrote: Gryffindor and annul both are being annoying but I believe they are town, at this point I think that most of the players who are being really active are town On February 25 2011 04:39 GMarshal wrote: Annul i'm ambivalent about, I'm not sure if he is scum, but his lack of actual contribution makes me suspicious of him, so for now I'm going to vote Annul, I may switch my vote as more information arises ##Vote annul GMarshal states he is "convinced" annul is town, yet proceeds to vote him anyway. Currently the votes on annul include GMarshal, who thinks he is town, Gofarman, who classified annul as an inactive, astroorion who is a complete lurker, and LSB who has had problems with annul is past games. Looking solid. On February 24 2011 15:31 LSB wrote: For example, in PM gryffindor just defended Iceman/annul. On February 25 2011 04:33 gryffindor wrote: We've got 7-8 hours, from my recollection. Let's do something about it. People on 1-2 person wagons need to get on either Icemac or Annul. Oh? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 23 2011 15:24 Gofarman wrote: I'm down with not killing active people thx. It's always better to knock off inactive early, the active ones leave people more information later on. To that end. ##Vote:annul Hope I did that vote right, I'll check and repost if need be. I also have a question for you annul, why completely ignore this post? I know I surely wouldn't let something like this pass if I was on the chopping block. I would like to see your analysis of gryffindor if you are truly "making your move" | ||
| ||
