EPT/in
n00b
don't worry KJ I don't feel intimidated by some terms.
Team Mini Mafia III BCE
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
/in n00b don't worry KJ I don't feel intimidated by some terms. | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + it's a great metaphor I just heard on some TV show | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
| ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
edit for clarity (and because it feels naughty in a mafia forum): tough guy = kavdragon | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
Since I didn't get it and Kav explained it to me, I'll assume someone else could benefit from an explanation as well: The colors on the banner are supposed to represent teams. Decon: I think it'd be silly to have a roleblocker and no roles to block, no? Setup 2 is the least likely imo. However, town circle is still out (no pm's). A few rules to clear up: Are we expected to stop communicating with our senior/junior partner if they are modkilled? Do we vote to lynch teams, or individuals? | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
A few rules to clear up: Are we expected to stop communicating with our senior/junior partner if they are modkilled? Do we vote to lynch teams, or individuals? | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
@Deconduo: ok, if any setup is equally likely, than I agree we should "assume" setup 2 -- no blues. It's never good to rely on blues too much anyway. LSB, I'm pretty sick of the day 1 let's lynch inactives campaign...but with almost no activity so far, we might have to. Maybe everyone is trying to coordinate with their partner before diving in head first? I know Kav and I have had internet availability issues at home as well, I might be stuck posting from work only for a bit  | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
On January 05 2011 01:43 Ace wrote: You should just vote for whoever you think will not help you win the game. This is an interesting perspective. I'm used to hearing that killing bad townies is still killing townies. A lot of the skill in scumhunting is in differentiating scum/bad townie, afterall. On January 04 2011 17:29 orgolove wrote: ... I'm not going to post any votes until there's something more concrete to go on. The idea is, use your vote to make something concrete happen. I hope we avoid lynching the most vocal/active players this game. Pressure inactives, if someone presents a good lynch great, but let's not kill someone who will be active for the rest of the game. I'll add some pressure for now. Vote: TheMango/Gmarshal/Foolishness | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
not that there's a whole lot of anything to discuss with him anyway. | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
I don't want Gmarshal to actually die. He's one of the only actives at this point. So I'll switch to beneather/BC for lack of anything better... ##unvote ##Vote Beneather/BC sorry about the ## thing before RoL | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
On January 04 2011 17:29 orgolove wrote: I apologize for being busy. So we're having a day 1 lynch without any starting information huh. An open setup with unknown roleblockers gives a disadvantage to the town, but as the saying goes, "a challenge means god's afraid of your progress" All right, lets see. ... Looking at the past two pages, there's nothing to analyze. There's only been two votes, and the only discussion has been whether to lynch inactives. no. Bad idea. In a game such as this, planning to lynch an inactive just allows the reds to guide the discussion to whichever inactive green they know isn't a part of them and leads to the town's disadvantage. I'm not going to post any votes until there's something more concrete to go on. Considering this is Orgolove's only post since the day post, I figure you must mean this one meapak? | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
Anyway, I think ace is harder to read than you make him out to be. And meapak did give a reason (sort of) for voting orgolove. | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
Nah, I'm at work, he's at school. I sent him a text, but he could be commuting right now. | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
| ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
| ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
Even though LSB is pulling at straws with that 'analysis', I don't want to lynch him. 1) he's so pro-town he sucks at being scum. 2) if we kill him activity will grind to a halt and the game will end with less than 20 pages. | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
On January 05 2011 02:31 Ace wrote: Yes it's still killing a townie but it gets you closer to your win condition. Doing it later in the game has major consequences but it's Day 1 and I don't see people trying to really do much. Alas I can't vote. Oh well. Since you're around Ace, I do want to hear more about this. How does lynching bad townies get us closer to our win condition? It's just one less townie for the mafia to kill, as far as I'm concerned. | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
##Unvote Beneather/BC ##Vote GMarshal/Foolishness/whoever | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
The reason I'm switching my vote off beneather is that he posted an analysis of me (quoted below) that makes me think he is town. Also, if he flips red, it will obviously mean nothing. So why would he bother writing it at all? Finally, they did nothing scummy to earn my vote in the first place, the problem was, they did nothing at all. Now that beneather has posted, it's time to move on. The reason I'm switching to Gmarshal/Foolishness/TheMango (sorry about forgetting you in my vote) is because I'm following my senior's analysis on this one, and that's the only way to save beneather I believe. RoL, please let my vote count or extend day or something. The inactivity is making this hard On January 05 2011 11:55 Beneather wrote: There is really nothing I could do about being lynched. Since the people that already voted hasn't been here to change their decision. There's really no information on who to vote for since there hasn't been much activity in this game. Also aidnai is supporting different people then all of a sudden against them very confusing. These post show that he agrees with what Ace is saying and just spamming away 1 line post etc. Here he is protecting Ace from LSB's attack on Ace saying that he's too pro-town that he sucks at being a mafia. So basically he's saying that LSB is scum. But don't kill him because that would make less activity. This doesn't make sense because aren't we looking to lynch mafia. If we get a mafia then we're one step closer to win the game. If we get a mafia on day 1 we'll get more activity and so on. I'm not saying LSB is a mafia I'm just saying what aidnai is saying completely is going left to right. Alright this post confuses me as lynching a bad town really confuses a town if he's a scum or if he's just a bad town. That's what we have to choose between to find scum. But aidnai is just saying that it is 1 less town that the mafia kills but that gets the closer to their own objective of out numbering the town. I believe the more town we have from not lynching them in Days is better for it will take longer for the Mafia to kill the town. It will also give the town more time to find these mafias. Yes lynching an inactive is good for the beginning but wouldn't it be better to lynch someone that is acting scummy. Near the end the DT's should have role checked the inactives to see if their scum. I think that's a better way of doing it because there is not other way of finding if their scum or towny since they're inactive. My comments on this to beneather: First, I was around this afternoon, so if you had posted earlier, i could have changed my vote earlier. Like you, I was forced to post without input from my senior. Unlike you, I was actively pushing and trying to generate some discussion. I'm not flipflopping around, either. I think Nemesis' vote was fishy to say the least, and even though I don't trust LSB or Ace per se, I don't think they are scum either. | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
I got a really bad feeling from Nemesis' vote on orgolove yesterday. | ||
| ||
