EPTTL Mafia XXXIV: Pokemafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
PIKAAAAAAAAAAAAAA | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Since day 1 there's the least amount of info possible, you really have to focus on a few select people and so usually the best people to focus on are the vets/good players/people not acting the way they usually do. A good list of people that have played a decent amount of games is: tree.hugger zeks Infundibulum LSB Hesmyrr d3_crescentia | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
I'll analyze the thread some more in a bit once I'm fed | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On December 11 2010 13:22 tube wrote: actually most of the earlier stuff kav said is the reason i voted for you initially lsb you were really suspicious with the way you got us to spend all that time discussing inactives before the first (real-time) day was anywhere near over then later i remember you pretty much completely changed stances on the issue That's the point...we always start off with a "lets vote inactives!" and then that prompts discussion which is the real reason anyone says "vote inactive? yes? no/". Obviously it's better to vote mafia then inactive. We have a very low chance of hitting a mafia if we're just going for inactives. I don't see what's wrong with it at all. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On December 11 2010 13:59 tube wrote: how is my responding to his response a scum accusation the only person I've accused so far is LSB, nor was it a random or angry accusation you just suggested that I be a lynch prospect on a basis that doesn't exist chaoser's post reminded me much of Gabriel's in that it was contradictory and made few actual points and if we really are past the point of inactive lynching, I really suggest that people go back and look at LSB's posts You need to calm down dude...Where in my posts have I been contradictory? You said that LSB has been flip flopping from lets vote inactives to lets not vote inactives didn't you? And I'm saying that that's a normal switch to happen. Most of LSB's stuff has either been pro-town or been responding to other's questioning. If mafia were trying to take over as town leader, they wouldn't be doing it the way LSB is, at least, not normally. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
As tree.hugger drowned in the water, a small voltorb exploded in the distance. Nothing happened. Hmmm, so he placed on MewTwo... | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On December 13 2010 12:27 BrownBear wrote: Youch. So tree.hugger either voltorb'd one of the two other deaths (probably jcarlson) or he forgot to place one. Well, that sucks. Pretty sure if someone died from voltorb's they would be reported as such. It was stated that no one died from the one that exploded. That's generally how mad hatters work. Kinda strange that you didn't know that...you've played enough games lol | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On December 14 2010 23:47 d3_crescentia wrote: The relative silence of the town bothers me, because it's just what mafia needs to win. The contribution of members named KtheZ, chaoser, deconduo, Insanious, ShoCkeyy, serApH, DCLXVI, Oceanic is virtually nil. We need to spend our time finding by rooting through the list of semi-lurking voters and figure out which ones we want to kill and/or check. Gabriel's insistence on a zeks vote today is distracting, but the votes on him thus far aren't very well-explained either. LSB and Shockeyy need to explain themselves on this. Actually, Shockeyy needs to explain himself, period. He only has ONE post thus far in the thread: + Show Spoiler + On December 12 2010 05:51 ShoCkeyy wrote: Alright, I feel like kenpachi is getting way to agressive here. All his post have been aggressive and not helpful in anyway. + Show Spoiler + A) 4 hours does not judge that. what if i went on TL tomorrow for the first time in the past 3 days? B) Anyone who posts would want to look active.. Why would they post if they want to look inactive? C) Why are you assuming i read the rules? how do you know i didnt just assume the KP? D) It doesnt. shh E) ?? its enlightenment F) I dont agree with you voting for Infundibulum. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=174831¤tpage=14#270 When he starts saying, that why do people assume that he reads the rules, makes me question him. Everyone reads the rules and we know this because that's part of the game. If he's saying he doesn't that just seems phishy to me imo. I also feel like, he posted the DT or Medic theory in order to try and get some people off of his case cause he can possibly be a TR member. I've seen this happen plenty of times where they pull out the "I might be a DT or Medic" and they end up not being it. My two cents, maybe I am wrong, but this is what I've been able to read off of. I'll be back in the evening, so don't go anywhere. Sorry! I'll contribute more right after my final exam on Thursday! 6 hour ER shifts + getting ready for finals gives me almost no time to do anything else x_x | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
chaoser- Someone bought shockeyy's argument quiet fast I dropped in, had to skim through everything quick, and vote cause I've been swamped with work. If you see, I voted Shocky cause he seemed pretty red and only unvoted when i read the very last post where he said he was medic. I don't think I brought up any arguments of his in the thread itself, and only wrote "oh wait he claimed medic?" in the voting thread...My vote didn't even count for DCLXVI lol | ||
| ||
