If it's allowed /in
TL Mafia XXXIV: Pokemafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
If it's allowed /in | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
/in | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Gabriel your actions are getting out of hand. I don't care if you were some vet before you got banned, right now you're playing like a reactionary noob with his first red role. Oh and change your sig. Right now my vote is on Gabriel, we might hit a red day one ![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On December 10 2010 15:22 Insanious wrote: So now we have 4 people voting for Gabriel with little to no explanation... actually I think like only 1 person explained why they were voting for Gab and the other three didn't even say they were voting for him or why... bandwagon on an active, outspoken player? Me no likey... Most people gave a reason, Gabriel took an extremely hostile stance towards several players, gave shaky reasons for his actions and bandwagoned shamelessly and then became extremyl defensive and rage quit when people questioned him. Until someone comes along and acts scummier I'll be keeping my vote on who I feel is the best lynch. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On December 11 2010 03:20 LSB wrote: For the DocH, + Show Spoiler + On December 10 2010 10:48 DoctorHelvetica wrote: and BrownBear in salem! i started that wagon ;o That didn't count, as far as I know it was Ghrur who switched the vote for you guys! If Kenpachi was scum on the other hand... Gabriel. The key thing we have to look at Gabriel is why he decided to Accuse Kenpachi. Is this because he is honestly trying to scumhunt, or is he pressured and wants to redirect the lynch The Kenpachi push looks like he is seeing someone that is lurking and wants to figure out what he is. The key point that points me is that he wants to DT check, not lynch Kenpachi (Whoops I gtg brb) This is his post against Ken, it came pretty out of the blue which was weird and then all he does is quote ken and doesn't offer any arguments of why ken's post indicate scummyness. On December 10 2010 11:20 Gabriel wrote: Interesting: my half good "im new" shot is now voting for me. Kenpachi care to explain A) your vote B) your deep posts? The game is like five hours old when he does this, trying to do a post analysis is an excercise in futility especially you don't offer any analysis with you posts ![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On December 11 2010 09:24 KtheZ wrote: I guess what we are waiting on now is for Gabriel to defend himself. There is still a day for him to prove himself to be a nice, calm townie. This is what I'm waiting for, if he responds in a levelheaded manner without flamming everyone then I'll definetly unvote him. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
If you have your vote on someone else right now read jcarls post, if that doesn't convince you then just read all of Gabriels posts. After rereading all of them just now I have no idea who Gabriel thinks we should lynch or why we should lynch them because quite frankly he's changed his position more times than konadora has LR posts. I really had wanted gabe to clarify and solidify his positions because I don't want to lynch the most active player right off the bat but instead of clarifying he's simply muddied the waters further which is very good for scum and very bad for town. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
@Gabriel, you didn't stop me from voting you, other people did. If all I had to work on were your posts than I would lynch you in a heartbeat but LSB and tree.hugger have convinced me otherwise. @Kenpachi, your last couple of posts have been worse than Gabes but I'm going to go off of previous experience and say that this is how you play in general. This is close enough to how you played in insane for me to feel comfortable letting you live. @zeks, never played a game with you but due to darth and (surprise surprise) gabe, I'm more inclined to think you're scum than anyone else on this list. @All other, I have one or two other people who I'm keeping an eye on but they haven't moved me to accuse them yet. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On December 12 2010 14:44 chaoser wrote: Guys...for everyone who played Salem...that's just how he plays -_- he was playing the exact same way he did in Salem, if he was mafia there would have been slight differences -_-. No comment. He played almost the same in insane as well... can we just lynch zeks or Gabriel now? | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On December 13 2010 04:43 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I bet 100 esports dollars that in Kenpachi's first game as mafia no one will lynch him. No because he'll act like a perfect townie and everyone will smell something is wrong ![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On December 13 2010 14:14 ghrur wrote: I just got done with my first readthrough, and the biggest question on my mind was, where was Meapak's analysis? He said he'd make a much longer post "tomorrow" when it was December 11th. It's now December 13th. He hasn't made such a post. What gives? The last person I played with to do this was Aidnai, who turned out scum. FoS Meapak. Excuse me but I believe I did make several longer posts after that. While none of it was a massive wall of text quoting every single post someone ever made, I did offer my opinion on what was going on and explained my actions. If you would like me to make a massive wall of text in order to prove my innocence since that seems to be your problem with me right now I would be more than happy to (although anyone who played insane with me can attest that my post analysis suck ![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
| ||