Haunted Mafia

On October 11 2010 13:53 orgolove wrote:

Korynne: one other person in the cafe, drove for a long distance and when she stopped in her driveway she could swear she heard a noise in the backseat, silenced gunshot

On October 11 2010 13:53 orgolove wrote:
Qatol: tall man, Right before he stepped off the stranger grabbed the back of his shirt. Qatol turned around to defend himself but was met with a hammer. The silver instrument bashed his skull to pieces, laughed maniacally

On October 11 2010 15:01 youngminii wrote:
aztro you realise if shmotz is actually scum you just signed your own death warrant

wait but then that would be obvious because if shmotz kills you at night then we would suspect shmotz

wait but if scum kills you in order to frame shmotz we'd all think shmotz is scum and we'd end up lynching an innocent

but what if shmotz knew that and actually decided to kill you anyway in the hopes that town would think scum is trying to frame shmotz

this is confusing

On October 12 2010 02:02 Flicky wrote:
My general opinion on the Whole Masq thing is that he's not doing a great job of defending himself despite it only being day 1.

While it's possible it's "too obvious" to some, as soon as I realised it can't have been a Jack O'Lantern framing, the more it seems that's the only lead.

Seems likely to me and that a possible miss-lynch wouldn't be too much of an issue.

On October 12 2010 02:09 NB wrote:
i notice a lots of people voted without reason or posting in this thread...
Just as a warning: thats make you really looks like a mafia/vampire who wana sneaky killing people.

I have a feeling that the more votes we have for masq, the deeper we are falling into a trap... The only reason i would vote for him right now is beacause he "seem" to have a teammate who is "Veldrill".As Dr.H has cleared out, Jack-o-lantern is a role and not a clue so the picture must be non-related....

I fact, We should pay attention to the people who are keep accusing masq and keep our track on them... Just to be safe.

a non related note: jodogohoo changed his vote again... there is something really supicious about the way this guy vote... He is either a newb or some psycho killer -.-

On October 12 2010 01:24 spydR wrote:


Perhaps because he doesn't want to be lynched within one day of play - particularly if he's telling the truth?

On October 12 2010 01:31 zerroth wrote:


I don't know. This just makes me feel like he's trying to protect Masq and himself at the same time. If he wants to protect Masq instead drawing on another person's name into the discussion, wouldn't it seem that they would be on the same team?

On October 11 2010 18:59 deconduo wrote:
Its nice to wake up to 10+ pages of mafia to look through. This is gonna be a loooooong game. Just a few quick things:

-Silver Hammer might refer to the Beatle's song, Maxwell's Silver Hammer. Especially as it was John Lennon's 70th birthday the other day. I'm gonna have a look to see if anyone has Beatle's lyrics in their profile.

-Gonna add some stuff to my profile on request from mods. Picture and quote will stay the same.

-I'm going to vote for Coagulation for now. The old 'Why me = fry me' rule has rarely ever failed me.

+ Show Spoiler +

On October 11 2010 18:59 deconduo wrote:
Its nice to wake up to 10+ pages of mafia to look through. This is gonna be a loooooong game. Just a few quick things:

-Silver Hammer might refer to the Beatle's song, Maxwell's Silver Hammer. Especially as it was John Lennon's 70th birthday the other day. I'm gonna have a look to see if anyone has Beatle's lyrics in their profile.

-Gonna add some stuff to my profile on request from mods. Picture and quote will stay the same.

-I'm going to vote for Coagulation for now. The old 'Why me = fry me' rule has rarely ever failed me.

+ Show Spoiler +

On October 12 2010 02:29 seRapH wrote:
as of right now, lynching masq is a 66% win, so to me it's acceptable:

A) if masq is scum, then hooray day 1 scum lynched!
B) if masq is townie, then people will realize how meaningless these clues really are.
C) if masq is blue, then but judging from his response its doubtful.


i wouldnt say flicky is "clearly" defending him, at any rate.

On October 12 2010 02:38 deconduo wrote:
Also, I feel we should not be focusing so much on clues. They will help us a lot more later on when we can add them up, but for now they are just a distraction. Posting style is much more important. Looking at who is voting and not posting is pretty crucial as well.

On October 12 2010 02:47 seRapH wrote:

VI
oh wait...

i'm pretty sure there are way more than that that are MIA

On October 12 2010 03:09 CubEdIn wrote:


As for masq, as I said in the beginning, it may not be the smartest thing to go on with such an obvious clue, but then again what other options do we have?
Really, no other clues come close to this in my opinion. If we find someone who's more likely, then I'd gladly change my vote.

On October 12 2010 05:33 seRapH wrote:
@NB i accused coag from the start because accusing people is a good way to get a reaction from them, and with that you can garner what you will. in this case, i believe the reaction i got from the terrorist is simply too shady to ignore. if he were a townie, he wouldn't be so much worried about getting lynched than hunting for the real reds. why should i accuse randomly instead of using the clues? because clues are very vague, and can be twisted every which way, i don't trust them.

if i were red, i'd stay low, until i know who i can accuse without attracting attention. i'd see that people thought masq was a good choice to accuse, and jump on that. or maybe masq was in my family and then i'd reserve my vote until someone else with a lot of votes not in my family comes up.