TL Mafia XXX

On August 06 2010 10:46 Divinek wrote:
you're so lucky i have no kp this game

On August 06 2010 10:55 Divinek wrote:


lol i forgot he was in this game i just saw pandain first in the user list

so... ill probably as in like 80% switch my vote to him unless he changes his habits

consider sir pandain a place holder then

On August 06 2010 11:02 KF91 wrote:


Nope; the two people that voted on BM didn't post their reasons as to why they did yet, so I guess they're just placeholders?

On August 06 2010 11:54 ~OpZ~ wrote:
....So game just starts and you idiots are accusing people of inactivity....(sorry if thats too rude for you flamewheel. Will try better later.)

Anyway...Time to come up with some ideas....

How bout we all massively role claim?!

No.

Anyway, let's stop the spam. Just spamming does not make you active. Spamming gets you voted just as often as being inactive. Ask Chezinu and Bill. And Darth. (Last game?)

On August 06 2010 12:07 Divinek wrote:
damn bm's reads are off to a good start

seriously if i was mafia i wouldnt have said anything and pushed to have him killed n1

obviously this is a wifom thing to analyze now that ive actually said it but yeah

On August 06 2010 12:24 bumatlarge wrote:


RNG is pure evil, agreed.

Yeah lynch divinek! But I guess in his defense, he posts like that normally. Look at last game, it may seem like hes trying to create a persona as town, but I think you should judge him based the direction of his posts in general. He just comes off that way because he is a fa+ Show Spoiler +

But by all means, lets lynch him first if no inactives rear their ugly and obvious head.

On August 06 2010 13:11 Pandain wrote:


Didn't really get defensive, just pointed out that he voted for me when he said we should lynch inactives, yet I've been one of the most active people. Just asked him what his real reason is. Not really defensive.
And yes, sadly I have been less quality than normal. I'm trying to fix it this game by typing larger things and not just one liners. Though I did feel the one you quoted was justified. Still, need to improve.



This is the type of post I'm aiming for. Don't feel like I should be voted just because I'm not that good yet(second game.) Getting better, but as of yet do not feel I have the expierence to make the definitive "ok guys, this is what you should do." That's why I think the very first post after Flamewheel said "gogogo" I said, "ok pros, give advice now."

On August 06 2010 13:11 rastaban wrote:
I placed the third vote on Divinek so I must now be mafia.. but wait I then unvoted and voted for BM, so that is he otes me he will be mafia, since they always retaliate vote. Looks like we have reached an impasse good sir, a catch 22

On August 06 2010 13:15 Divinek wrote:


i got quite the interesting vibe thus far as well.

also good plan bm now that everyone knows it you can enact your super secret plan B right! If you were doing what you said you were doing, then obviously telling everyone that's what you were doing makes it a lie doesnt it? (since you openly told people before the entire point of the plan happened, you clearly didnt intend to do what you were saying you were) Or it makes you really stupid.

lynch all liars as they say right

On August 06 2010 15:00 VayeshMoru wrote:
I have just spent time reading some of the game Bill Murray just ran. I seem to be be at a crossroads now. The town last game early on was against random bandwagons starting. But I see this what would be defined as a mistake I suppose happening again. Is this meant to draw information? Although this early on I don't see how it would give you much to go on.

If I understand how this game should be done, should we not be concentrating on a more logical method for our lynching? I think it would be at least prudent if we discussed who was getting votes and why. As of now I see Divinek and Bill Murray tied at 3 votes. After looking at this, then comparing to what has been said, why are there no reasons posted? Is this method not too chaotic?