EPTTeam Melee Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
I think it's fairly silly to also not lynch ace for the sole reason of getting the DT role alot. Roles are random, so he has as much chance as anybody. But I'd rather not lynch competent people either. Mafia will do that for us >  Not really inclined against anybody at the moment, so I'll wait to see what comes out of the woodwork. Not that I'm really expecting much to happen on the first day when there is absolutely nothing but a person's history to go by. I'm not going to be lynching my own teammate thank you very much. | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
We should really get this show on the road as to who are candidates for lynching. I dont feel comfortable just resting my vote on someone who Im not even 50/50 on. But we cant just let ourselves get swayed so we should start deciding soon. Im not sure whether having alot of different people under two red roles is good or bad, as they can spread enough while still stacking a bit with not mch consequence, but then again, we can take the direction a team is going and question them. I'd think teammates would be fine disagreing on points and not hinder the town in certain places, but we should be wary of a DT team trying to play off a rolecheck without getting mafia suspicion. If we even have one So this doesn't happen I'd suggest a DT team to gather two rolechecks and publicly post the info on the third day, or as soon as they find red. The medic would protect the proclaimed DT baring a roleblocker for as long as possible. I dont think mafia can chance publicly faking DT with only 2 reds in the game, so trading a DT for 1 red would help alot. I think checking a town would be relatively useless as PMs are banned, so try to check legitimately suspicious teams. Id think this game will be very down to the wire if there are no blues and a half decent mafia squad. Otherwise we have have a really good chance with proper analysis. | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
Make yourself expendable  | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
Make yourself expendable | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
and no "I know im not mafia therefore I am not mafia" logic please lol Still not going to bandwagon just yet from a team who has that cheezenoodle guy on it  | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
by night three, mafia has a little less then 50% chance of hitting a a blue if there is one , and considerably higher chance if there are two. In other games I would advise a lategame strategy, but this game should be shorter then usual. The only reason I appear scummy is that I responded to your assumptions of who should be lynched based on the amount of people in each team and whether or not to lynch certain people based on what roles they have gotten previously. Lynching by posting history is a far superior plan then this. DT cant rolecheck a townie and then PM them, right? So the only use os knowing a regular townie for the public is that it's one less person we'd mistaken lynch. And the only way that would be revealed is if a DT would sacrifice himself... because if we have a medic and a DT then they have a RBer and thats a dead DT, (therefore a DT should only reveal with a mafia in his hand). Then the townie would be an easy target later but there is still the medic. I just put my vote for yellow as a placeholder until a better candidate comes up, which will be most likely some inactive he hops on a BWagon late with no excuse I guess. Please keep you vote on me yellow if you are mafia, because that makes it easier for the town if I get lynched. If you back off, I'll gladly take my heat off you and let the majority decide. I'm ready to die cheezenoodle. | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
And durak I sure am being mysteriously silent to hide my batman persoan you + Show Spoiler + SCOMBO | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
And it hasn't even been close to 24 hours yet, with 48 hours til verdict, correct? People have jobs and lives, and if I did not have this phone I wouldn't have been able to make more then 2 posts since the game started. I do agree with korynne that all this blame is a bit quick, and from yellows history, he makes very randomly good and then inocous posts. I'd much rather find some glaringly obvious lurker, but we'll have to wait. | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On June 23 2010 10:45 Durak wrote: Who is this clown? You go afk all day, come back, and make some ridiculously biased "summary" post. First of all, you say "our main options" as if you're some authority. You haven't said anything in this thread to separate you from anyone else. In fact, you've just kept under the radar. Second of all, your bolded choices are biased. Your first post in this thread, before anything began, accuses 2 and 8. You repeated the same people in this post even though they have been discussed relatively little. Rather, people have pointed their fingers at you. Give me some analysis or I don't see any reason to listen to you. You're talking bigger than you have shown. Stick it to the man! Not voting for this bad-ass thats for sure | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
And whos to say durok here isnt some mastermind himself? Until I've gotten to know someone through my own experience with them, you really can't make too many judgments about them. Give him a shot to earn his spurs, then ask who the fuck he is. I'm making a list and I'm checking it twice. Too bad Laxer is asleep or busy, I dont think he'll be as fun to watch as the previous game, where he was in full bloom of his potential  joshin ya laxer. Anyone want some alcohol induced analysis? Spell-check is cool. That is all. | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On June 23 2010 11:32 LaXerCannon wrote: Oh god, I just read over the thread twice and I can't seem to make out anything past the initial YI and Bumatlarge argument. I'll give it another stab tomorrow when my mind's less...scrambled. I lied! Reading back on what I wrote, I think I should proofread more. I convey the ideas so poorly, no wonder Ink thinks (lol) Im sketchy. Bill Murray's sig is awesome. | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On June 23 2010 12:05 DarthThienAn wrote: You do it your way, I'll do it mine =P. And I don't mind that. I'm here anyway zz. On another note, I don't think anyone's responded to my first post directly -_-. If I may say so, it was very incriminating But a nice chocolate sundae of what people are doing so far since the day dawned. | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On June 23 2010 13:42 L wrote: ... That's retarded. It's perfectly fine, the only downside would be a disagreement with your own teammate, thus splitting it into smaller fractions. But they did sign up later, and no one on 3man teams has complained. Are you going to complain for them? | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
Its not necssarily the same as inactivity, or even quantiy of posts. For instance Radfield has barely posted, but you can get substance from his posts and get a clear position on his stance. Most of what I have posted is roughly the same as him, but garbled up and repeated (I blame the habit that when im using this small-ass keyboard I post like Im texting -_- and you dont think twice about it) So if you haven't, make a clear vivd 5-7 line paragraph on what you think is important, if you have not posted substance yet. Check it as if you were handing in an assignment, so we can see your opinion clearly at least. I guess people yellow and darth have pointed out should go ahead and try it. Plus it's nice to see a fresh personality's take on things. | ||
| ||
