EPTTeam Melee Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
nothing like colour coding dah posts too omg the spoilers | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
'hey guys this is what we should do to catch dem red fellars.. right?' seems quite suspicious enough to cast my random vote | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On June 23 2010 06:49 YellowInk wrote: Define active? You think this posting in code in thread is helpful to the town? They could just be PMing to each other. Clearly they intend for it to be read, they're just making it difficult for every town team to pick it apart. It muddies the waters. I'm not saying it makes them scum, but I surely don't count this sort of posting as making them active. BM coming after me, Chez's question for me, Chez posting resulting opinion of me, etc - this is substance. The codes are trash. So I agree with you that they're being active, you should be careful to observe for the correct reasons. Use similar reasoning when you look at others - find posts that have merit and only consider them. well im just saying it makes it far less likely they're townees, they could be blue or red, but why would townees be so self destructive as to make wild baseless allegations and hinder the team by causing too much confusion. Obvisouly attacking someone can draw out reactions but yeah, it just leans me more to thinking they're not green and being mindful for that | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On June 23 2010 10:45 Durak wrote: Who is this clown? You go afk all day, come back, and make some ridiculously biased "summary" post. First of all, you say "our main options" as if you're some authority. You haven't said anything in this thread to separate you from anyone else. In fact, you've just kept under the radar. Second of all, your bolded choices are biased. Your first post in this thread, before anything began, accuses 2 and 8. You repeated the same people in this post even though they have been discussed relatively little. Rather, people have pointed their fingers at you. Give me some analysis or I don't see any reason to listen to you. You're talking bigger than you have shown. yeah, accusations like that look a little scum to me, at least im not a fan of a 'scum list', i guess it's okay to be undecided but when you're just like 'suggesting' things for other teams, but without anything to back it up it just looks like diverting attention more than anything, more than you really believe it at least. The word 'our' really makes it interesting for me, though not conclusive enough based on the posts just yet | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
yo dawg. I dunno I'm not entirely sure voting down the least active is the best idea in a structure like this over post analysis, but im not sure how much real content there is to be had yet so im like 51% for voting against activity right now so i went with that unless something i see sways me. | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On June 23 2010 18:15 Zyrre wrote: This would be bad for mafia in my eyes. In the first day they can easily start voting early since they only need a few weak arguments at that stage to start off the voting and they will probably get a lot of townies along with them. Doing what I did would be terrible if I was mafia. If I later would want to change my vote to the best/most active townie, I would have to explain myself based on all the posting that has been done today. Instead of just the early few pages. I'm casting my vote on BM's team right now. He's arguments and plans still feel off to me. Didnt you just say if you were going to vote for someone active you would do it based on all the posting that has been done today? Then you cast your vote on bm's team saying it just feels 'off' without any reasonable backing, starting to like my vote where it is based on this and the first post | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On June 23 2010 13:12 DarthThienAn wrote: BrownBear, I'm not sure getting on L's case for his list is going to help anyone. Continue to do so if you're mafia though, it's a good way to distract the thread. When I saw that list, I immediately interpreted it as a summary of the last few pages, possibly because I had recently read all of the posts and knew it was along those lines, but still, I didn't see it as a random "L's lynch list" kind of deal or anything like that at all. Divinek, that's all I wanted to know =p. yo brosef i see you voted for mah team. But yeah id like to know why since at this point team 1 can basically jump in and sway the current win either way, was it something in my saying or is it cause my team mates have been too quiet. Wouldn't want your vote to be the deciding one sitting idly on my team | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On June 24 2010 05:53 Radfield wrote: Rather, I'd like to hear peoples thought on Team 9. Although I want to hear Team 9's thoughts as well Well my posts are probably pretty low content cuz im trying to learn this game as i go, since this is my first time playing. I'm pretty busy in life right now so im trying to post when i can and stay above the threshold of inactivity. I'm obviously not very good on reading yet and it's pretty early on the game so i dont want to target someone with too much conviction unless i have good reasoning, cause i dont want to confuse people etc. I think based on zyrre's posts my vote for team 7 is a pretty good one based on what has happened so far, but it's hard to say as i dont have histories on any of you and i dont have time to read through the other threads yet. I think my team mates are also pretty new to the mafia scene? so they're probably trying to lay low and watch what the good players do, at least that's what im doing and at least for the first day i figured it was solid to go with strong arguments others presented + my own reads. Since i might be pretty shit at throwing strong accusations up i wouldnt want to get my team meaninglessly in trouble. Is that good or were there other specific questions | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On June 24 2010 06:58 YellowInk wrote: Radfield, note that I already called out team 9 on inactivity, but it was 10 hours before close of voting. + Show Spoiler + This makes it difficult to use voting as a method of pressure. I agree that team 9's posts have been trash. + Show Spoiler + I had considered shifting to team 9 before going to sleep, but at that point team 9 was no worse than team 7. As you can see, the team 9 analysis is before team 7 picked up their activity - I was posing an alternative location for pressure. I had hoped that would kick team 9 into gear. When it got too late in the day, there was no reason to apply pressure to team 9 since their activities aren't precisely red, they're simply inactive. I'd be on board with putting the squeeze on team 9 at the start of tomorrow if they havn't shaped up. If BM turns up green I still thing bum would be an excellent target. Speaking of - since my 'crusade' on bumatlarge does not appear to have been well received, can people post why they don't agree with my analysis? Is it because BM looks to be a better target? Is it because you really think bum is more likely to be green? I'd like to hear responses on this because I feel like my posture is falling on deaf ears. I'd like to hear from anyone who cares about what I have to say. :D At any rate, it's not something happening today. If BM/Chez flip red, that makes bum look much more green and Team 9 deserves more scrutiny. hm well since you asked i went through his posting history and i must say about 80% of it is complete crap and spam, what little content i thought would be of importance that i got were these bits Sorry yellow but your looking pretty viable for a first lynch as of now... These half hearted posts always seem like scum to me, it may be an inaccurate read but it's just kind of one of those 'i dont want to commit' things in order to fuel other people into going 'hey he's right lets get him!' And after saying that he didnt really analyze any further just left that word and was like k good for me, which doesnt make much sense at all if you really think someone should be lynced This seems to have escalated above us yellow, lets go into a hidey-hole and wait for the whole thing to blow over not much on this one cause you could metagame yourself on it but obviously a good towny would be analyzing people and not advocating hiding, and i think the purpose for this post was if he continued posting crap like he has or not at all he can be like well i already said i was going to hide or something Stick it to the man! Not voting for this bad-ass thats for sure Another thing that didnt really contribute at all, but maybe looks like a red subtly protecting another red? Cause it seemed like he for sure was taking some heat at the time of this post, but even this would look wayyy too bad if he flipped red so he'd have to be a pretty terrible red to say this if it was the case If I may say so, it was very incriminating Again, no real analysis just, oh i think you're bad but im not gonna vote kind of thing. Fanning flames but not backing it up with any vote/analysis. Very weak and trying to stay under the radar If I make it to day 4, I swear to god I will start the bandwagon on myself, and anyone who doesn't vote for me is mafia the old reverse mind game, why vote for me when im gonna kill myself anyways kind of thing. At that stage it could obviously be too late Also based on the posts he seems VERY sure there's a DT on this game so im starting to think he's almost certainly not green, but his posts have still been so empty i cant rest on red/blue | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
| ||
