Yea I saw it and was just like :/

If people are going to be laxed this game I think we should vote off lurkers. More discussion helps the Town and if people don't talk then we'll lose.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

March 23 2010 16:49 GMT

#40

new player from what I know

Ace

United States16096 Posts

March 23 2010 20:41 GMT

#46

Well its the very beginning and most people aren't really that good at figuring things out this early ^_^

##vote Versatile## for not bringing any other women into the game with her

Ace

United States16096 Posts

March 23 2010 20:51 GMT

#51

##vote haster27## for thinking he will live long enough to vote last moment

Ace

United States16096 Posts

March 24 2010 03:59 GMT

#71

Ok seriously voting now.

##vote Vivi57##

He's inactive and he's is by far the worst player in this game. We all know this so lets stop kidding our selves.

FoS on nemy. Both posts he has made have had literally nothing. He is the only one besides Vivi57 so far that has had people vote for him seriously and he pretty much scoffed it off. Defend yourself for real or get voted off.

Citizen her leaving my name off the list wasn't THAT fishy, so I don't see why you voted for her. Looked like weak reasoning to me.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

March 24 2010 04:19 GMT

#73

no, a bad player thats active is worse than an inactive. Both of them will make the town lose but at least with the inactive player you know it's not because of stupidity.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

March 24 2010 05:12 GMT

#77

Vivi you are so bad it's ridiculous.

"he's doing a ton of crap and moving votes around" - doing stuff is null and moving votes around is usually scummy. It's so early and not enough people have wagons on them so there isn't too much sketchiness about switching votes. However indecisiveness is usually meaning you can't make up your mind about something or just dont want to stand your ground, the latter of which is usually scummy.

The read on fishball is cool, but knowing that guy he voted for nemy for the lulz.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

March 24 2010 05:21 GMT

#80

lmao.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

March 24 2010 15:53 GMT

#82

Doesn't matter what day it is, we should always prioritize killing Mafia. The thing is just the fact that people are voting for whoever they think is scum/they surely know is innocent is telling.

But on to a finer point: Vivi is just bad. In fact I don't even have to tell you, and you don't even have to read past games to know - look at his response in this very thread. Instead of even trying to look innocent he kinda shrugs it off and casually tosses a vote onto fishball. Bad players don't help you win and no one else except nemy looks remotely suspicious.

Also, Vivi is a lurker. So if you want to say we should start lynching lurkers to force them to post then we might as well lynch the scummiest of all the lurkers. Between Vivi57, yourself and Abenson reading this thread from the beginning who looks the scummiest? My answer would be set on Vivi57 just like my vote.

As for citizen and Versatile I thought that was just hilarity. People insult each other all the time in Mafia games and that didn't seem over the top to me. Also being emotional isn't exactly a bad thing ^_^

Ace

United States16096 Posts

March 24 2010 15:56 GMT

#83

my bad, error in the last post. Vivi placed a Fos on Fishball but voted on johnnyspazz.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

March 24 2010 22:20 GMT

#96

On March 25 2010 05:52 nemY wrote:

Show nested quote +

To be honest, i still don't quite understand the WIFOM scenario, but yeah i googled most of it. Can someone care to elaborate on WIFOM? Regardless, it seems like people are trying to act all hip and cool by using mafia-related terminology, when in fact all they're really saying is NOTHING CONTENT RELATED. It's ok though, I get it. Day One lynches have little, if anything to really be based on. That said I change my vote to ##Abenson## because he's first on the list of people and because he's posted absolutely NOTHING but sarcasm this entire game.

WIFOM is very simple but it's usually explained in retarded ways. Simplest way to look at it:

1.) I can do X to you.

2.) You know I can do X, so you will do Y.

3.) I know that you can do Y, so I'll do Z.

4.) You know that I know you can do Y, and that I can do Z, so you'll do A.

5.) I know .....so I'll go back to doing X.

It's just a way to say "hey if I were you, I'd do this!" and from then on people discuss from there at which point it's no longer rational to do X,Y,Z or A (because in a game of Mafia none of the 4 choices usually exist, it's usually like 2 and MAYBE 3 at best).