BloodyC0bblers's Mafia XVI

On January 21 2010 08:17 QuickStriker wrote:


Uhh... yes we did??? And like no one is around to discuss and talk about the game in contrast to the other mafia game where it's way more active.... =/

On January 21 2010 08:34 QuickStriker wrote:

Hmm... well welcome!!! Glad to have at least one more active member of our little town.... it seems the mafias have put some poison gas or some sort of gas which is why everyone is silent or sleeping right now.... o.O

On January 20 2010 17:01 XeliN wrote:


I think that analysis overall was extremely good, from reading up on some earlier Mafia games it seems that the host often likes the come up with elaborate or entertaining deaths. This in itself makes the " With a quick attack " stand out far more in my eyes, and somewhat exonerates the other as possibly just being a whimsical choice by the host.

In all honesty this by itself is enough to make me fairly suspicious and Quickstriker I am still more suspicious when I see some of what you have typed. In particular your reaction to no_re's non-serious accusation where you are essentially saying we must "hold off any action untill the DT comes forward and leads us through the valley of death and into the promised land" - I paraphrased,

This however, as far as I can tell is an exceptionally bad strategy, the point of electing a mayor or sherrif is someone who seems active, discerning and importantly decisive, and your suggestion of sit and wait reeks to me on manipulation at an early stage.
p.s. am i doin it rite?

On January 21 2010 09:41 Fulgrim wrote:
Hey guys I hate not being able to check the thread during the day..... I was thinking about what our plan was to try and win this thing because currently (I haven't had time to read all of the posts yet) we seem to be focused on WHO we are electing. We also need to think about who we want our DT's to role check (assuming they check the thread often enough) and how they can communicate any information they get without giving away their role. The whole thing kind of gives me a headache... ANYONE could claim to be a DT and so it would be hard to tell whether they were really a DT or just trying to screw us over. Ideas anyone?

On January 21 2010 09:52 QuickStriker wrote:
Well no one really can admit they're DT UNLESS they're looking for a death wish. I mean if the DT steps up and admit to himself he's the DT, what do you think will happen? The mafias will auto-target that person and before we know the results of the role check or clue check, he's dead. Bam, gg. So obviously whoever is DT is hidden and cannot reveal as the DT but must act as part of the crowd, as the regular ordinary townie citizen.

That being said, I think the best case for the people running for positions is to state who they do wish to use their first lynch one as that the most important case right now.

Now, I want to move back to the DT matter and note that for DT, there are only 2 role checks you can do and UNLIMITED clue checks. If you look at the rules, that's what it said with explanation. To maximize and help the DT, I gave some suggestions back in previous pages on how to take onto this matter but I'll repeat again in a simple short manner. For the first night, I recommend the DTs to get one post that sums up all clues, have that post checked using "clue check" rather than role check wasting the precious limited uses you can for that. They must suggest and lead the way to the town in which direction this game must go to, and have evidence and reason without revealing you are a DT to everyone, or else you're dead. It's like in the anime deathnote. If Kira sees you, you're going to get written on the notebook and bam. GG. So be wary of that.

On January 22 2010 05:18 ~OpZ~ wrote:
-_-...
Quickstriker can't be trusted!

That is all...

On January 22 2010 05:57 d3_crescentia wrote:

And yours, for that matter. Baseless arbitrary fingerpointing without rational justification will DOOM our society.

On January 22 2010 02:06 dozko wrote:
The way I see it there are three main candidates - Fulgrim, tree.hugger and d3_crescentia. I did not vote for Fulgrim, although i tend to agree with a post he made on Quickstriker and Xelin before my analysis. He is the most popular candidate although he has listed the least number of arguments to support his campaign. This I find slightly suspicious.

On January 22 2010 00:30 ShoCkeyy wrote:
The other 25% go to those who are quietly coming in that have watched us argue about who to lynch first. I feel like they watched us bicker to see and now that we have some what of an idea who we're going to lynch first. Now the mafia come in to back them up so we an lynch a townie. Which brings me to my other conclusion. Decafchicken I'm watching you.

On January 22 2010 06:54 decafchicken wrote:
I vote for fulgrim

On January 22 2010 14:06 QuickStriker wrote:

Hmm..... I can't say I don't understand your intentions as I understand your desire to be mayor. However, what troubles me is the first part you said where not to have a mafia be mayor when tree.hugger was almost taken for the spot as mayor.... does that mean you considered him as mafia?

On January 22 2010 14:21 QuickStriker wrote:




I love stealing other people's ideas in the other mafia game. Although I can take credit, I do not wish to but Zona from the other mafia game makes an excellent point and a better insight and plan of what a DT should do rather than my original suggestion of using a "clue check" on compiled clues... Some food for thought to think about it.

On January 22 2010 15:24 ~OpZ~ wrote:


Says.....the untrustworthy one....

On January 22 2010 14:00 tree.hugger wrote:
Aww damn, I was expecting lunaticman to ninja vote for me.