|
On July 29 2011 03:04 sandroba wrote: @lanaia WTF? BC argued with the whole thread, while foolishness only sat on the side lines observing we mislynch. How can you compare both, when they were complete oposites?
They felt the same to me. I can't explain it, but they really did feel similarly to me.
|
On July 29 2011 03:05 Lanaia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2011 03:04 sandroba wrote: @lanaia WTF? BC argued with the whole thread, while foolishness only sat on the side lines observing we mislynch. How can you compare both, when they were complete oposites? They felt the same to me. I can't explain it, but they really did feel similarly to me.
You still feel scummy to me.
Foolishness would be a better lynch than Chaos imo.
|
Do you even care who we lynch today?
|
At the very least, their style kept causing me to mix them up. I mean, obviously I don't have the best reads, but I did get the two of them confused.
|
On July 29 2011 03:07 sandroba wrote: Do you even care who we lynch today?
To whom were you addressing this? I have a hard time following you due to your manner of speaking without always being clear who you are addressing.
|
That was directed at you.
|
heist, if we have a double lynch can we off both chaos and Foolishness today?
Nisani can wait.
|
Also, Varpulis why'd you disappear when I asked you if you'd prefer chaos or Foolishness?
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On July 29 2011 03:04 sandroba wrote: @lanaia WTF? BC argued with the whole thread, while foolishness only sat on the side lines observing we mislynch. How can you compare both, when they were complete oposites? No. Where's your coherent argument against me? I want a post that's longer than 1 paragraph. The ones you did write earlier I took time to respond to. And then all you respond with is another 2 sentence paragraph of which is basically "lol ur wrong sittin on the sidelines".
It's almost like your blaming me for everything that's gone bad so far. I was the first one to cast suspicion on kitaman yet you're the one (among others of course) that went and voted for him. Then even though I said BC was making sense, me not spamming the thread with DONT LYNCH HIM means I didn't care about the town. I didn't realize that me having a job and not being able to post made me mafia.
You're one of the people that voted for him and made him post for 10 pages straight, take some responsibility and post some analysis against me if you think I'm mafia. You're 2 liners saying "lynch him he's scum" is exactly the kind of posts that got BC lynched since nobody really bothered to do any behavior analysis.
You also seem to think that me pressuring inactives day 1 says that "I don't care about the town" and that makes me mafia, even though this is what I do every game. Look at mafia XII if you don't believe me, where I basically ignored the elections and the elected officials until day 3. I can find other games as well (I just happened to be rereading that game the other day) where I focus on the inactives the first few days and ignore all the active and contributing members.
And no, before you say it, I do not think you're mafia (at least at the moment), nor am I trying to spread doubt on you for your actions. Your accusations of me are the exact thing that got BC lynched. I took time to respond to what people said about me, and your response is "@Foolishness your defense is laughable". Yet you never explained why other than the phrase "sitting on the sidelines".
|
On July 29 2011 02:15 Varpulis wrote:actually, let's lynch him. Right now I don't see a much better target. Why? He posts nonsense: Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 10:48 Nisani201 wrote: It doesn't matter if you give someone the elder wand anyways. For someone to properly use the elder wand, said person must kill its last owner. So ON would have to kill sandroba to use it. Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 10:56 Nisani201 wrote: There is probably a Snape, and in that case we should wait the whole Harry Potter/Voldemort thing out until Snape claims. Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 11:00 Nisani201 wrote:On July 25 2011 10:59 redFF wrote:On July 25 2011 10:56 Nisani201 wrote: There is probably a Snape, and in that case we should wait the whole Harry Potter/Voldemort thing out until Snape claims. Please tell me how you figure this... there is probably also a Gellert Grindelwald, or perhaps a Rowena Ravenclaw, or maybe a Dobby! Unless you have some other reason to think that there is a snape. I have no idea if there is a Snape. I could be completely wrong. It's entirely speculation. scratch that, useless nonsense. He's quick to make weak accusations and jumps on safe bandwagons: Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 12:27 Nisani201 wrote: Ugh, first I have redFF being a hero in Vigi mafia and shooting someone in the first hour of vigi mafia, and now I have this?
Ugh, whatever. youngminii is probably scum, because he, you know, KILLED A TOWNIE ON THE SPOT.
##Vote youngminii Show nested quote +On July 26 2011 10:13 Nisani201 wrote:BC is suspicious, but not just for trying to avoid an alignment check. This post I found particularly scummy: On July 25 2011 13:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote: What, the fuck is this shit? Multiple day 1 claims? people already lying. Day vig already shooting? The fuck is this shit. Purely for knowing better, and combination of a townie role designed around killing another player Jackal is now up for lynch.
Before anyone one goes "lets slow down here" He outright lied about his role, and we know based on a role flip that ON had a statement saying he was out to kill harry potter. As such the two should be opposite alignment, or at the very least, HP third party. As such he dies. We do not keep liars around, we do not keep people around who are on a quest to find bullshit items.
Also whoever made my role, go die in a fire.
##vote jackal58
The above post was extremely uninformed and looked like it was trying to start a bandwagon. That, in addition to the reasons I stated earlier in this post, I think that BC is the best lynch. ##Vote: Bloodyc0bbler And he hasn't done shit, taken a side, or in fact made a single remotely helpful post all game. ##vote Nisani201
1) youngminii was nota bandwagon, and 2) I did take a side; against youngminii and Bloodyc0bbler.
|
On July 29 2011 03:46 Curu wrote: Also, Varpulis why'd you disappear when I asked you if you'd prefer chaos or Foolishness? I was doing other things. Foolishness.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
ugh was supposed to say First
|
I've explained to people many times why you are mafia, but I'll sum it up nicely:
1)The only long posts you made so far is to defend yourself. You don't care for the discussion of who is or isn't mafia.
2)I'm not blaiming you for what's going bad, you are only doing your job. You want to look good when a mislynch happens, but not prevent it (BC's case). That's not what a townie cares about.
3)You lied in your defense to make yourself look better. You cast suspicion on kita when Jackals wagon was forming. But you did not commit to it. When asked if you wanted a check on kita you declined, even when town wasn't convinced he was scum. So really you didn't care about lynching scum, you only wanted jackal not being lynched.
4)You are not pressuring lurkers. You selectively only pressure the lurkers which turned out to be town.
5)You are distorting my actions to discredit me. I argued with BC because I disagreed with him, but I never voted for him or thought he was scum, until a DT, who was most likely town, came back with a red check. Despite that, I still tried to prevent his lynch, but it was too late.
To sum it up, your behaviour fits mafia goals perfectly, which is to survive, to not look suspicious and to dissuade town from lynching your fellow scum.
|
You also wasted your vote on someone who wasn't even being discussed as a lynch. You could have chosen a side or pushed your opinion, but instead you chose to abstain.
|
The Sheriff is back in town.
|
On July 29 2011 04:12 sandroba wrote: I've explained to people many times why you are mafia, but I'll sum it up nicely:
1)The only long posts you made so far is to defend yourself. You don't care for the discussion of who is or isn't mafia.
2)I'm not blaiming you for what's going bad, you are only doing your job. You want to look good when a mislynch happens, but not prevent it (BC's case). That's not what a townie cares about.
3)You lied in your defense to make yourself look better. You cast suspicion on kita when Jackals wagon was forming. But you did not commit to it. When asked if you wanted a check on kita you declined, even when town wasn't convinced he was scum. So really you didn't care about lynching scum, you only wanted jackal not being lynched.
4)You are not pressuring lurkers. You selectively only pressure the lurkers which turned out to be town.
5)You are distorting my actions to discredit me. I argued with BC because I disagreed with him, but I never voted for him or thought he was scum, until a DT, who was most likely town, came back with a red check. Despite that, I still tried to prevent his lynch, but it was too late.
To sum it up, your behaviour fits mafia goals perfectly, which is to survive, to not look suspicious and to dissuade town from lynching your fellow scum. What the fuck? Points 1 and 3 are blatantly wrong. I never wrote a long post to defend myself, I've never mentioned kita at all in this thread, and I never lied to defend myself.
In fact, this post is so bullshit that I'm calling scum on you.
##Vote: sandroba
|
You have only 1 vote on you (mine), and instead of hunting for scum you make a huge defense post. You don't care about town =P
|
On July 29 2011 04:15 Nisani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2011 04:12 sandroba wrote: I've explained to people many times why you are mafia, but I'll sum it up nicely:
1)The only long posts you made so far is to defend yourself. You don't care for the discussion of who is or isn't mafia.
2)I'm not blaiming you for what's going bad, you are only doing your job. You want to look good when a mislynch happens, but not prevent it (BC's case). That's not what a townie cares about.
3)You lied in your defense to make yourself look better. You cast suspicion on kita when Jackals wagon was forming. But you did not commit to it. When asked if you wanted a check on kita you declined, even when town wasn't convinced he was scum. So really you didn't care about lynching scum, you only wanted jackal not being lynched.
4)You are not pressuring lurkers. You selectively only pressure the lurkers which turned out to be town.
5)You are distorting my actions to discredit me. I argued with BC because I disagreed with him, but I never voted for him or thought he was scum, until a DT, who was most likely town, came back with a red check. Despite that, I still tried to prevent his lynch, but it was too late.
To sum it up, your behaviour fits mafia goals perfectly, which is to survive, to not look suspicious and to dissuade town from lynching your fellow scum. What the fuck? Points 1 and 3 are blatantly wrong. I never wrote a long post to defend myself, I've never mentioned kita at all in this thread, and I never lied to defend myself. In fact, this post is so bullshit that I'm calling scum on you. ##Vote: sandroba ...he's talking about foolishness.
|
LOL Nisani, are you even reading the thread? That post is about foolishnes.
|
|
|
|
|