On July 29 2011 02:17 sandroba wrote:
Can we concentrate on one person at a time? For now I sugest we keep our targets limited to foolishness and chaos13.

Nisani has the same number of votes as the two you proposed. why is he not a valid lynch/subject of discussion?

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

July 28 2011 17:20 GMT

#1582

No, like you said Varpulis Nisani looks scummy as hell no matter what he is. I was just asking if anyone has the magical power that no one else has to actually be able to tell what he is from his 50 words in the thread.

chaos or Foolishness today, forget I said anything about Nisani.

Varpulis

United States2517 Posts

July 28 2011 17:22 GMT

#1583

On July 29 2011 02:19 sandroba wrote:
Well I can see nisani being scum, but I really can't be sure. I'd much rather we lynched one of the above.

exactly my point. He's unreadable. I'd rather get rid of him now than when it's vital to nail scum. I don't trust the vigi's in this game anymore, so lynching is my only tool to do so.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

July 28 2011 17:22 GMT

#1584

People stop reacting to every single thing that happens. Read the history of this thread and make conclusions based on that. If we change targets every time some event happens this is going to end up badly.

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

July 28 2011 17:26 GMT

#1585

Varpulis, if it came down to it, Foolishness or chaos? Who's your vote?

Kurumi

Poland6130 Posts

July 28 2011 17:27 GMT

#1586

Nisani is a lurker. He made no contributions whatsoever and his posts are fluff. Making him a null-read. There's one thing though: when You can't read someone, You:
a) Check him. Might not work thanks to cover roles.
b) Kill him.
c) Lynch him. This is a policy lynch... quite useless to get info from it.
Basically, if we decide on lynching Nisani our lynch isn't as good as it would be... but since we have other lurking people it might make them post more (and probably slip if they're scum!)
The thing is, when we try to lynch vocal players (although flying under the radar chaos13) many things spew out. Chaos13 defense, people who defend/attack him and scum shenanigans(redirecting lynch etc)

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

July 28 2011 17:31 GMT

#1587

I'd much rather some vig shot nisani instead of wasting time arguing if a lurker is or isn't scum.

Kurumi

Poland6130 Posts

July 28 2011 17:31 GMT

#1588

On July 29 2011 02:31 sandroba wrote:
I'd much rather some vig shot nisani instead of wasting time arguing if a lurker is or isn't scum.

Agree on this.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

July 28 2011 17:35 GMT

#1589

Look at the list of players alive. Remove those you think are town. I challenge you to think about a scum team that does not include foolishness.

Kurumi

Poland6130 Posts

July 28 2011 17:37 GMT

#1590

On July 29 2011 02:35 sandroba wrote:
Look at the list of players alive. Remove those you think are town. I challenge you to think about a scum team that does not include foolishness.

How big Your scumteam is?

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

July 28 2011 17:39 GMT

#1591

I guess 5-7 players?

Kurumi

Poland6130 Posts

July 28 2011 17:40 GMT

#1592

On July 29 2011 02:39 sandroba wrote:
I guess 5-7 players?

You mean overall? I'd bet 5 scum total, seeing 2 are dead I think we're looking for 3 scum.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

July 28 2011 17:42 GMT

#1593

I'm inclined to believe there's a bit more or several third party, since a game with pure blues is very town favored otherwise for 20% scum.

Kurumi

Poland6130 Posts

July 28 2011 17:44 GMT

#1594

On July 29 2011 02:42 sandroba wrote:
I'm inclined to believe there's a bit more or several third party, since a game with pure blues is very town favored otherwise for 20% scum.

I think there are no 3rd parties or they did not kill anyone N1.
The secret alignment is worrying me though.
By the way:
Please don't try to get the Hallows.
We should give them to confirmed town.

heist

United States720 Posts

July 28 2011 17:51 GMT

#1595

NO ONE SHOOT FOOLISHNESS. I've got him covered. My role creator knows what I'm talking about.
If he's to be the lynch, he'll be taken care of.

heist

United States720 Posts

July 28 2011 17:53 GMT

#1596

Meaning, if Foolishness is going to be lynched, I'd rather he be killed and Nisani take his place.

I'm not really clearly understanding the votes on Chaos. It seems like he made an analysis, he was wrong, and now he's being voted.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

July 28 2011 17:58 GMT

#1597

@heist so you are killing foolishness and rather we lynched someone else?

heist

United States720 Posts

July 28 2011 18:01 GMT

#1598

I'd rather we lynch nisani. But if town consensus wants foolishness killed, I will rather we not waste a lynch on him.

Lanaia

Canada1142 Posts

July 28 2011 18:01 GMT

#1599

On July 29 2011 02:17 sandroba wrote:
Can we concentrate on one person at a time? For now I sugest we keep our targets limited to foolishness and chaos13.

I really don't think foolishness is scum. He feels a lot like BC to me and as such, I don't think he is scum. If I had to, I'd consider voting chaos13, but I'm definitely not sure of his alignment and I'm not sure I personally can read him.

I know I have lurked a little, but I'm not trying to. I know there are people in the game who have posted significantly less than I have.

On July 28 2011 23:47 sandroba wrote:
I really think we should ignore the penalties and claim whoever we made the roles for. This creates acountability and will make it easier to identify mafia acording to the actions so far. Is everyone in favor of this?

I don't know if I'm in favour of it, but part of me thinks it could help a bit. I think we could find scum in a way, this way.
I'm going to reread today and see if it's viable for me to risk penalty to say what's on my mind right now. Of course, I could be completely wrong.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

July 28 2011 18:04 GMT

#1600

@lanaia WTF? BC argued with the whole thread, while foolishness only sat on the side lines observing we mislynch. How can you compare both, when they were complete oposites?