EPTOn April 21 2012 09:07 VisceraEyes wrote:
##Vote: Mattchew
Scum were going to win sir. WE WERE GOING TO WIN!!!
##Vote: Mattchew
Scum were going to win sir. WE WERE GOING TO WIN!!!
yeah, you were. sorry im MKP and you Parting.
TL Mafia 'Area' LIII - Page 8
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
yeah, you were. sorry im MKP and you Parting. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
BlazingJitsu
United States112 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:07 VisceraEyes wrote: ##Vote: Mattchew Scum were going to win sir. WE WERE GOING TO WIN!!! No case? ;_; | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
a. he is scum in like 99% of his recent games b. he gets away with everything "because he's Bill Murray" | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
he didn't post it in the voting thread so i'm gonna guess it was a joke | ||
|
BlazingJitsu
United States112 Posts
-Blazinghand | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:15 Mattchew wrote: So anyway should we policy lynch Bill Murray because a. he is scum in like 99% of his recent games b. he gets away with everything "because he's Bill Murray" No, because he's Bill Murray. Seriously though, Policy Lynches should be a last resort. This is stated at the beginning of every game by one player or another, I don't get how people still want policy lynches. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:17 johnnywup wrote: No, because he's Bill Murray. Seriously though, Policy Lynches should be a last resort. This is stated at the beginning of every game by one player or another, I don't get how people still want policy lynches. why so serious, why not let the idea breathe? maybe even have it force BM to post, maybe let some scummy mofo's bandwagon it? Are you going to shoot down anyone pressure voting too cause thats gonna make you cover up for a lot of peoples reactions | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
We do need some sort of talking point however. I suggest we all say what we think vigilantes should do given the setup. I think that if they do shoot they should claim their shot well in advance to give a tracker the chance to track them. This would make it extremely risky for mafia to claim vigilante. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:24 Mattchew wrote: what about roleblockers laya? Not a role, but I guess mafia could switch there KP to kill the vigs. | ||
|
BlazingJitsu
United States112 Posts
I think all the Vigilante' should shoot Layabout. He's mafia ezpz. | ||
|
BlazingJitsu
United States112 Posts
| ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:29 johnnywup wrote: We're assuming there even is a vig. No we aren't. I am asking a hypothetical. "What should One shot Vigilante* death millers do?" + Show Spoiler [*] + One-shot Vigilante Death Miller: You may Night Kill a player once per game. You flip Godfather on death. It's an interesting mechanic that could be very anti town. The mafia might try to exploit it with claims. By discussing it we can ensure that if there is a Vig out there they will know what the best thing to do is. If there isn't well i suppose we will have used up time that could have been spent insulting each other or trying to lynch a player for completely arbitrary or downright stupid reasons. | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:22 layabout wrote: No more talk of policy lynching players because we hate reading their posts. We do need some sort of talking point however. I suggest we all say what we think vigilantes should do given the setup. I think that if they do shoot they should claim their shot well in advance to give a tracker the chance to track them. This would make it extremely risky for mafia to claim vigilante. you said what they should do, which makes it seem like you think there is definitely a vig. so I wanted to clarify that there might not be one at all. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:38 johnnywup wrote: you said it in a matter-of-fact way. you said what they should do, which makes it seem like you think there is definitely a vig. so I wanted to clarify that there might not be one at all. Rather than commenting on what it "seems like I think" why don't you look at what I did in say and respond to it? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:42 VisceraEyes wrote: I want to lynch any Vig claims. One less night-kill immune GF if he's fake-claiming, and one less possible townie death due to vig misfire imoimo So you support us not knowing the alignment of the player we lynch. You also support not using KP in town hands. VE as far as i am aware, vigilante shots hit mafia more often than lynches do. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:48 layabout wrote: So you support us not knowing the alignment of the player we lynch. You also support not using KP in town hands. VE as far as i am aware, vigilante shots hit mafia more often than lynches do. Shows what you're aware of. Games with me in them, lynches hit scum by DEFAULT bro....you know, since we're making shit up and spouting off random untrue statistics. | ||
| ||
