NYC LAN #3 and 4 Kickoff! - Page 6

On December 15 2009 14:10 fanatacist wrote:

Ok bro this is not going to work out because I am going to be monster high/have upwards of an ounce of weed on me/be drunk or drinking.

On November 08 2009 15:14 Psyonic_Reaver wrote:
Now you MIGHT even respond lololol PsyReaver trying to act all cool because he knows Ret and talks to him when I clearly avoided saying something like that in the first place but you ignorantly assumed I was talking out my ass. So Chill. You and your fucking attitude can go fuck yourself.

This is the REAL reason I avoided you at Blizzcon because you're a fucking prick. Happy?

On December 16 2009 16:39 QuickStriker wrote:
I'm sorry guys but until I get a confirmation on which days Pokebunny will not attend, I would gladly attend and have fun with all of you. Sorry Pokebunny, but you made yourself too offensive and too full of yourself on that other blog and that grudge toward me can become deadly in which I don't want to add you into my drama list. If you were only reasonable and nicer, I would reconsider but I just don't want to hang out with this kid anymore. So let me know and see ya.

On December 16 2009 17:05 tree.hugger wrote:


You keep a... what?

Never mind, I don't even want to kn- ... ... ... can't we all just get along?

On December 16 2009 17:28 zulu_nation8 wrote:
do you realize hes 14

On December 16 2009 17:34 QuickStriker wrote:


Yes, I am fully aware of that fact, and I know that despite the fact that we have a 7 years age difference, the respect level of such an age group shouldn't be this low in the modern world. That's just my own input on that.

On December 17 2009 01:25 Pokebunny wrote:
LOL.

I called you full of shit for one extremely ignorant comment you made... don't know why that makes you want to completely avoid me, but if you want to I guess so then... just lol. I have no personal grudge (at least not significant) that should cause you to avoid me... come on, really? I'm just amazed that you would take something like that so badly that you would skip a whole LAN for it. Who cares if I'm 14, doesn't matter at all on the internet, I don't think any of what I said showed that I was "full of myself" - if anything, I think you basically implied that you were more important than other people.

If you really care, I'm pretty sure I'm going for the 19th but 100% not going on the 26th. Have fun on the 26th without your mortal enemy there QuickStriker!

On December 17 2009 02:18 QuickStriker wrote:


Hey, this is NYC, anything and everything is completely possible. I've heard on Z100 last weekend at nighttime where some girl called about a problem where she's sexually active with a 14 years old boy and she's 22 and asking for help.

On December 17 2009 02:16 motbob wrote:
You want... to beat up.... a 14 year old.

On December 17 2009 02:13 QuickStriker wrote:


Looks who's talking. It's not at all I want to avoid you but rather avoid myself from coming to punch you really badly when we meet up because that's how my mind and reaction is right now. I felt that if we ever had a meet up that involves both of us, it will be either you or me who will be left standing after an actual physical fight, and I don't want either one of us go to jail for that since it would not be beneficial to me at all. But if you really insists I should come when you do, I suggest you have your mind completely settled and prepared for death as if it is coming to you, because I will not hold back to a kid who's so disrespectful and intolerant such as yourself.

And no, look around you more carefully whenever people really gossip around you of how you are all "full of yourself" at times. Though it shouldn't be me who's mentioning this but rather someone who can actually give you advice and influence that hopefully won't let you be exactly like this 7 years later...

*edit* As I made a promise not to respond in the other thread regarding a partial percent of my fate, I'll quickly mention it here. Who is it for you to mind one's business like that so easily? I've mentioned like in 6-7 different posts there and here, have you actually read all of them? I highly doubt it with a response like that...

No, I don't intend to make this a flame war but I do response to those who flame in an act of explanatory counter action which could or could not provide further flame but depends on the other party if they wishes to flame harder in which mostly they do. A clear explain is shown here.