EPT[EURO 2016] Grand Finals - Page 22
| Forum Index > UEFA Euro 2016 |
|
Warfie
Norway2846 Posts
| ||
|
BeaTeR
Kazakhstan4130 Posts
can't wait when my lovely epl is back | ||
|
Liebig
France738 Posts
| ||
|
DucK-
Singapore11447 Posts
| ||
|
[DUF]MethodMan
Germany1716 Posts
| ||
|
sharkie
Austria18564 Posts
| ||
|
DucK-
Singapore11447 Posts
On July 11 2016 06:33 Warfie wrote: so what do you guys think of allowing this many teams past group stage, should it be kept or not? It is a shit format | ||
|
Makro
France16890 Posts
i have great hope for the WC2018 | ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
| ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
On July 11 2016 06:31 HolydaKing wrote: I agree, but the tournament had lots of fun stories. Iceland, Wales... CR7 drama in final and Portugal wins is a nice story as well. Even if the game wasn't very good. I still dislike Ronaldo too much and the results which took Portugal to the final to be able to enjoy this. And while I loved Iceland murdering England and a few of the fairytale runs, they all ultimately ended in disappointment and there were far too many horrible games in the group stage. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32746 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On July 11 2016 06:33 Warfie wrote: so what do you guys think of allowing this many teams past group stage, should it be kept or not? The seeding gets weird, so no big fan of this. | ||
|
Alchemik
Poland7124 Posts
On July 11 2016 06:33 Warfie wrote: so what do you guys think of allowing this many teams past group stage, should it be kept or not? depends if we want weak teams like England and Spain in the knockout stage | ||
|
Dan HH
Romania9151 Posts
On July 11 2016 06:33 Warfie wrote: so what do you guys think of allowing this many teams past group stage, should it be kept or not? Either have 16 teams or 32, this system makes the group stage boring | ||
|
Ysellian
Netherlands9029 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 26513
2376 Posts
| ||
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
Tournament soccer in general is really stale right now, I don't think it matters that much what the format of teams advancing from groups. Though it's funny Portugal wouldn't have advanced from groups in the normal format. | ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
On July 11 2016 06:33 Warfie wrote: so what do you guys think of allowing this many teams past group stage, should it be kept or not? Should be extended to 32 countries so small countries like Netherlands can also participate | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On July 11 2016 06:34 Alchemik wrote: depends if we want weak teams like England and Spain in the knockout stage Need Pande for the threads so the format needs it so bad enough teams qualify to get England through | ||
| ||
