EPTOn July 19 2009 14:22 WiseMike wrote:
I do hope that I may be able to make some small contribution
I do hope that I may be able to make some small contribution
No! Go big or go
+ Show Spoiler +
TL.net Ten Commandments - Page 67
| Forum Index > TL Community |
|
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
No! Go big or go + Show Spoiler + | ||
|
Torenhire
United States11681 Posts
Welcome to the 5 or 6 new folks!! :D | ||
|
Etherone
United States1898 Posts
so for the record i object. .. but don't ban me i still love you guys <3 | ||
|
empty.bottle
685 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27174 Posts
On July 19 2009 15:39 Etherone wrote: I actually find it wrong that Mensrea's post was edited instead of keeping Kennigit's new post as the official rules and preserving Mensrea's 10 commandments in an archive, for entertainment purposes etc.., lol sort of like an "old/new testament" type of deal. so for the record i object. .. but don't ban me i still love you guys <3 Congratulations, you are one of 50000 people who dont read the articles section. | ||
|
yohman
United States1 Post
| ||
|
Etherone
United States1898 Posts
On July 19 2009 16:18 Manifesto7 wrote: Congratulations, you are one of 50000 people who dont read the articles section. i don't read through it every time i log on no, but i did check it before i posted that, but i only checked the Eternal Art section, because i thought that is where it would be, my mistake. edit: and for the record im actually one of the people who has read quite a few of the articles in the Articles section. | ||
|
Sea.LeTa
Korea (South)4 Posts
| ||
|
ActualSteve
United States627 Posts
Seems to me that the text gives a right-of-way to people with a few thousand comments. I could post a couple thousand comments by the end of this week, using a bot of some kind ... but would that give me the ability to post on our strategy forum with 100% respect? I look around in this site and realize that the top posters bring a lot to the table. But many of them bring little to nothing. I just don't see why we have to appear elitist and put them up on the pedestal. | ||
|
Ass[eM]
Canada4 Posts
| ||
|
GotPho
United States2 Posts
| ||
|
JesusLovesYou3
6 Posts
| ||
|
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
On July 22 2009 07:51 ActualSteve wrote: I'm assuming that just means that if someone's been around long enough to post over 1000 quality posts, then the mods are more willing to forgive a few transgressions since they've shown that they can be good posters most of the time. People who are new are unpredictable, they haven't been around long enough to show if they can be polite/valuable members of the community, so if they act up the mods would rather take the safer option of just banning them before they can cause any trouble.I agree with everything, but 6 stuck out. Seems to me that the text gives a right-of-way to people with a few thousand comments. I could post a couple thousand comments by the end of this week, using a bot of some kind ... but would that give me the ability to post on our strategy forum with 100% respect? I look around in this site and realize that the top posters bring a lot to the table. But many of them bring little to nothing. I just don't see why we have to appear elitist and put them up on the pedestal. Also, they don't just look at post numbers, they look at posting quality as well. If you have 1500+ posts, start flaming someone randomly, and a mod looks through your post history and see just a bunch of useless one-liners, then they'll ban you. If you lurk through the ban thread then you'll see a few occurrences of this happening. | ||
micronesia
United States24779 Posts
On July 22 2009 07:51 ActualSteve wrote: I agree with everything, but 6 stuck out. Seems to me that the text gives a right-of-way to people with a few thousand comments. I could post a couple thousand comments by the end of this week, using a bot of some kind ... but would that give me the ability to post on our strategy forum with 100% respect? I look around in this site and realize that the top posters bring a lot to the table. But many of them bring little to nothing. I just don't see why we have to appear elitist and put them up on the pedestal. Certainly read Falcynn's post, but also I believe that posts accumulated too rapidly don't carry much weight unless they contain great content. If you just registered recently and accumulated 2000 posts that aren't notable at all (as opposed to some people who receive a star for their great commitment/dedication to providing content to the community), then the commandment barely applies to you at all. | ||
|
Intropy
Canada92 Posts
| ||
|
BadaBing!
United States5 Posts
| ||
|
Froadac
United States6733 Posts
| ||
|
pogz333
Philippines1 Post
| ||
|
Synwave
United States2803 Posts
See yall around. | ||
|
Spoonman
10 Posts
| ||
| ||
