4.7k laptop?! - Page 2
Forum Index > Tech Support |
ztranger
Sweden57 Posts
| ||
Antimage
Canada1293 Posts
On January 19 2011 05:11 Sufficiency wrote: With a 13" screen I don't think it's suitable for gaming. This ultra-portable laptop is for work, man. My 13" laptop is quite suitable for gaming. | ||
GinDo
3327 Posts
On January 19 2011 05:25 Scorcher2k wrote: Why the hell would they put those components into a laptop with a 13" screen... Thats what i said. So much power and then i saw the 13" and i died a little inside. What a waste. Screen should be at minimum 15.6" but 17" would be perfect | ||
Boblhead
United States2577 Posts
1/2 the money with 2x graphics cards option. http://www.xoticpc.com/sager-np7280s1-built-clevo-x7200-p-2935.html | ||
Marradron
Netherlands1586 Posts
On January 19 2011 06:53 GinDo wrote: Thats what i said. So much power and then i saw the 13" and i died a little inside. What a waste. Screen should be at minimum 15.6" but 17" would be perfect Not to mention it might actually be cheaper with 17 inch since the the components wouldnt need to be so tight. the 12 hour batery life is often measured idle. If you start running powerfull programs it'll drop rapetly | ||
Jago
Finland390 Posts
Average Boot Time : 60 sec WTF? I have a desktop with a single Intel SSD (and not 2 faster ones in RAID) and my boot time is under 20 seconds. | ||
Twitches
Canada365 Posts
| ||
realgrimreaper
United Kingdom12 Posts
However would I recommend anyone buy this laptop? Nope. Not unless you have the money to throw at it (especially with the rise of netbooks, this laptop is not value for money). | ||
GrazerRinge
999 Posts
Joke beside, it is THE overkill for daily use. It is only viable option when you make more then that in a month. | ||
Highways
Australia6098 Posts
You can get dual 480GTX's, i7 940M etc.. | ||
Skrammen
Norway195 Posts
| ||
nalgene
Canada2153 Posts
It's like 1700+ for parts and +Name = 4700... that thing's specs are merely 8GB 1066 and timings aren't even listed... prob like 9-9-9-24-2T... 330M... wtf... they should give you like 2x480M or 2x5870M variants... should be 4cores x1 socket from 2cores x1 socket for that price... asus has things equal/better than what they sell you for the same price... | ||
Sprungjeezy
United States1313 Posts
2800$ for sex on your desk. | ||
semantics
10040 Posts
Windows ultimate a 13 inch 1920x1080 screen super expensive 2x 256 ssd's very expensive Intel® Core™ i7 - 640M expensive You're paying for portability over power. sure you can get better performance for that price, but can you lug it around like it's nothing. 13" and 3 lbs. The screen and the ssd's alone would retail like 2k, considering i've been around business that are willing to spend 2k just on a monitor i suppose this would fit into the high end business man who needs power but more importantly the ability to lug it around everywhere. | ||
Marcus420
Canada1923 Posts
| ||
Cel.erity
United States4890 Posts
These $5k Toughbooks are pretty cool though. Supposedly they can withstand drops from 100 feet, and survive a full cycle through a residential dishwasher. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834150169 | ||
Disposition
Canada77 Posts
| ||
duk3
United States807 Posts
Get a $500 laptop, a $1500 desktop and then do the same thing in another 2-3 years if you want. 60 seconds boot time sounds pretty slow for a SSD to me | ||
semantics
10040 Posts
On January 19 2011 08:47 Disposition wrote: I find it crazy that it has a 60 second boot time when its using SSD. Any for people talking about "having to fit" 2 SSD in a laptop, have you ever seen the size of one? It's pretty small. BIOS i bet if you turned of little things you could cut that to nearly half. SSD only makes it faster when it goes to load the os. I'm guessing all the little things like bluetooth ad's to the time to boot. | ||
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
On January 19 2011 06:42 Antimage wrote: My 13" laptop is quite suitable for gaming. Do you use an external monitor as well? Just wondering | ||
| ||