EPTIEM Katowice 2017 $250,000 Tournament Info - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
CryovaK
4 Posts
| ||
|
Tesarul
Belgium79 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/rpK4Ajr.png) | ||
|
BaneRiders
Sweden3630 Posts
On January 14 2017 12:25 Tesarul wrote: For those who asked for a picture of the format, behold my amazing Paint skills: Awesome! | ||
Ziggy
South Korea2106 Posts
| ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
| ||
|
HsDLTitich
Italy831 Posts
On January 14 2017 09:52 He11ra1s3r wrote: how they will choose those 64 players ? It's an open bracket, you just signup. | ||
|
lechatnoir
392 Posts
So excited! | ||
|
Crocolisk Dundee
870 Posts
On January 14 2017 12:25 Tesarul wrote: For those who asked for a picture of the format, behold my amazing Paint skills: That is very useful. Thank you!  | ||
|
Thax
Belgium1060 Posts
| ||
|
True_Spike
Poland3434 Posts
| ||
NonY
8751 Posts
Bracket stage sign-up will be available for 64 intrepid players at the conclusion of all online qualifiers. Due to the limited number of spots, preference will be given to players based on region, 2016 WCS performance, and in-game ladder performance. | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23579 Posts
 .Use “total bo3-wins” -> “map score (6 : 3 > 6 : 4 > 5 : 3 etc)” -> “direct bo3-wins among tied” -> “direct map score among tied” -> “one round of decider matches bo1 or 3” -> “coin toss” https://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/5nrsq7/iem_announces_76player_tournament_with_250000/dcf29ll/ They will use map score first, if two players have the same match score. So for example Showtime would be first over TY at IEM if they had the same results as at WESG. | ||
|
Elentos
55586 Posts
On January 15 2017 04:11 Musicus wrote: I asked Carmac how they would handle tie breakers in the round robin phase and if head 2 head or map score comes first . Definitely interesting for the competing players at the very least .https://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/5nrsq7/iem_announces_76player_tournament_with_250000/dcf29ll/ They will use map score first, if two players have the same match score. So for example Showtime would be first over TY at IEM if they had the same results as at WESG. So with that system Elazer would have been out instead of Major right? | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23579 Posts
On January 15 2017 04:19 Elentos wrote: So with that system Elazer would have been out instead of Major right? Major won vs Elazer and they had the same map score right? If so then yes, Major would've advanced. | ||
|
Semikolon
Norway46 Posts
EDIT: My bad.. The ticket site says sold out, but I found out the tickets go on sale on Jan 17th. | ||
|
Kafka777
361 Posts
Major won vs Elazer and they had the same map score right? If so then yes, Major would've advanced. You are using a false assumption that if rules were different, the results would be the same. | ||
|
Elentos
55586 Posts
On January 15 2017 23:29 Kafka777 wrote: You are using a false assumption that if rules were different, the results would be the same. In the case of the Major/Elazer/Scarlett tie you could assume that the results would have been the same though because it wasn't decided how the whole thing was going to go until the final match of the group was played. It's not like the TY/Showtime tie where TY had the group won after 4 matches and could just do whatever in the last match. However, it was just a theoretical example to demonstrate how the rules are different. It's not so much assuming the results would have been the same under different rules, it's exemplifying how different rules would play out for the same results. | ||
|
Kafka777
361 Posts
In the case of the Major/Elazer/Scarlett tie you could assume that the results would have been the same though because it wasn't decided how the whole thing was going to go until the final match of the group was played. It's not like the TY/Showtime tie where TY had the group won after 4 matches and could just do whatever in the last match. This may be a bit more complicated. The final match between Elazer-Scarlett decided seeding. 2-0 gave Elazer easy 10k $ or somewhat risky 20-50k to Scarlett. 2-1 reversed the risk, but we could assume Elazer felt more confident against Showtime. Also having different set of rules it is most unlikely Elazer would lose a map against Zerghandi as it would have a different meaning and openings would have been safe and the final map score would have been different. | ||
|
Comedy
469 Posts
On January 16 2017 01:12 Kafka777 wrote: Also having different set of rules it is most unlikely Elazer would lose a map against Zerghandi as it would have a different meaning and openings would have been safe and the final map score would have been different. I can assure you that this is false. | ||
|
Dungeontay
126 Posts
| ||
| ||
