Comparison of League Distributions
Forum Index > SC2 General |
ShdwHntr84
5 Posts
| ||
Krystal
New Zealand67 Posts
| ||
ShdwHntr84
5 Posts
| ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
CycoDude
United States326 Posts
| ||
fteneq
United States49 Posts
GLHF to everybody! | ||
CursOr
United States6335 Posts
| ||
ShdwHntr84
5 Posts
On July 13 2016 15:19 CursOr wrote: what really surprises me is that they seem to have decided that people can't handle being in bronze... at all Bronze has developed such a negative meaning that it seems they want to make it as small a league as possible. The less people in bronze the better? | ||
ShdwHntr84
5 Posts
On July 13 2016 13:20 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: So i'll probably get a promotion when i start laddering again. sweet Probably. I went from gold to plat 2 today :D. | ||
ihatevideogames
570 Posts
I was plat last season and winning 70% of my games, playing mostly vs diamond players. It gave me plat 1 this season and I'm currently 3-25. The heck is going on, is it the new maps or did the plat league get that much better? | ||
Beliskner
111 Posts
On July 13 2016 15:37 ihatevideogames wrote: It seems strange to me. I was plat last season and winning 70% of my games, playing mostly vs diamond players. It gave me plat 1 this season and I'm currently 3-25. The heck is going on, is it the new maps or did the plat league get that much better? You're probably right on the cusp of Dia 3, and that's the problem with the old system wasn't it, sure those players had diamond boarders but who knows what their mmr was at the time. Unfortunately because your MMR didn't change with this update and it landed in plat 1 it's likely that your mmr was closer to mid to high plat and you were versing people who would be demoted or just getting heavily unfavoured matches and now it's high-plat1/low-dia3 edit:: Sorry If you're getting smashed now going 3-25, you're probably just hitting returning players with good skills but provisional mmrs, so it's not really plat getting better but versing opponents whose MMR's haven't settled. Plus everyone plays so tryhard/cheesy at the start of the season. | ||
Dingodile
4123 Posts
| ||
ihatevideogames
570 Posts
On July 13 2016 15:55 Beliskner wrote: You're probably right on the cusp of Dia 3, and that's the problem with the old system wasn't it, sure those players had diamond boarders but who knows what their mmr was at the time. Unfortunately because your MMR didn't change with this update and it landed in plat 1 it's likely that your mmr was closer to mid to high plat and you were versing people who would be demoted or just getting heavily unfavoured matches and now it's high-plat1/low-dia3 edit:: Sorry If you're getting smashed now going 3-25, you're probably just hitting returning players with good skills but provisional mmrs, so it's not really plat getting better but versing opponents whose MMR's haven't settled. Plus everyone plays so tryhard/cheesy at the start of the season. Most of my opponents had no rank, there were playing calibration matches, so your theory makes sense. It did seem strange to me when I was vsing people with 300 apm. | ||
Isarios
United States153 Posts
| ||
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
| ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20164 Posts
On July 13 2016 19:53 Teoita wrote: Source? Blizzard announced these percentages a while ago | ||
-NegativeZero-
United States2136 Posts
| ||
LDaVinci
France130 Posts
My guess is that mainly lower player stopped between WoL and now. So the number of Master player should somehow remain constant in order for a master player to not get demoted just because he isn't in the top 2%. If the lower half just quit the game, the player would be top 4% and probably Diamond. So that enable the master player to stay master even in a smaller number of players. Making a bigger master league seems totally reasonable in that regard | ||
CyanApple
48 Posts
On July 13 2016 20:43 LDaVinci wrote: What would actually be more significative than the percentage is the actual number of players. My guess is that mainly lower player stopped between WoL and now. So the number of Master player should somehow remain constant in order for a master player to not get demoted just because he isn't in the top 2%. If the lower half just quit the game, the player would be top 4% and probably Diamond. So that enable the master player to stay master even in a smaller number of players. Making a bigger master league seems totally reasonable in that regard Wouldn't the MMR population on higher MMR then be more dense than on lower MMR? Couldn't it be confirmed, by comparing the range of MMR for the higher leagues with the range from lower leagues? I.e. is the range of masters ~6 times smaller than the range of silver/gold/platinum/diamond or (much) smaller? | ||
propagare
Germany93 Posts
| ||
| ||