|
On March 31 2016 13:36 MoonyD wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2016 12:06 showstealer1829 wrote:I have to pull for Stats. Anything to save us from data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52cfb/52cfbd5afebb84a476640834046988dd35f644cb" alt="" v data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52cfb/52cfbd5afebb84a476640834046988dd35f644cb" alt="" I couldn't agree more. Hoping for Stats to win simply so we can avoid a ZvZ finals >__< Although to be honest, it's hard to imagine Dark losing a Bo7 to either one of them in the finals.
vs Solar? Not really.
Series was a 4-2 and a lot of the games were competitive.
|
I think Solar also has the advantage in practise partners for this match up. He has Dear, huricane and stork.Stats has Leenock and losira.
|
|
|
Well, ZvP >>> ZvZ, so there
|
Let's have history correct itself and give solar a nice win here and in the finals!
|
only one prediction to make and TL gets it wrong?
|
On March 31 2016 16:12 EatingBomber wrote: Well, ZvP >>> ZvZ, so there
MU between two highly competitive players > likely blowout
|
On March 31 2016 13:41 hexhaven wrote: I can't believe you people would opt for 4-0 ZvP finals over some of the best ZvZ of the year. I agree that their first match was some of the best ZvZ I've seen in years, but that doesn't mean their rematch would be any good if it came to be.
I also don't think the difference between Solar and Dark is so big in ZvP that, if Stats manages to Solar by any score, he gets 4-0'd by Dark anyway.
|
Stats 4-0 Solar Stats 4-0 Dark
That's all
|
He who won, didn't win in a fun way, same strat every single match .
I hope for a better final, even though the semifinal was not bad, I was still hoping for some fun builds or something.
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
Loser's, Losers', or Losers?
|
Mute City2363 Posts
|
Finland916 Posts
|
Canada8157 Posts
|
|
|
|