EPTWCS EU/AM - BabyKnight, Stephano, Scarlett, Polt, Revival,…
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
bloodyrooster
United States15 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
| ||
|
DnCL
86 Posts
On May 09 2013 21:38 turdburgler wrote: babyknight played smart, stephano played dumb. made swarm hosts, never took position to pressure a base so babyk could just keep building towards his perfect 200/200. kept losing bases to zealot run bys and or dts. instead of building spines and spores on his creep and moving them over when he puts the base down, he was using the hatcheries own creep start them and then positioning them wrong, giving babyk 3 minute windows to remember to harras. used corrupters to fight collosus but suicided them every time, they just dont seem to fit the swarm host play style, especially not how he used them. stephano really didnt look like he understood how to play the style he was using. he should have used roach hydra or something he is more comfortable with. Are you sure you are not describing the games that stephano won VS grubby ? I think I recall baby 2 base pushing early, killing the third into win-pushing. Well executed btw. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On May 10 2013 00:36 DnCL wrote: Are you sure you are not describing the games that stephano won VS grubby ? I think I recall baby 2 base pushing early, killing the third into win-pushing. Well executed btw. akalon wastes especially, baby knight was out on the map but he wasnt engaging. stephano couldnt/wouldnt, depending on how harsh you want to be, position his swarm hosts close enough to kill buildings. the difference vs grubby was that grubby wasnt preserving his army as well, he was losing templars and archons, and didnt add tempests etc. so i guess you can say babyknight played well or stephano played badly. but its not as simple as who attacked and who defended. grubby lost a lot of his gas units for no reason, so he couldnt get his perfect 200/200 army. | ||
|
testthewest
Germany274 Posts
| ||
|
DeathProfessor
United States1052 Posts
| ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
On May 10 2013 03:37 DeathProfessor wrote: BK is reaching that certain age where people get damn good at SC2. Around 17 yes? May be a dark horse to win! June 15, 1992 (age 20) http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/BabyKnight | ||
|
snively
United States1159 Posts
| ||
|
DRTnOOber
New Zealand476 Posts
On May 09 2013 21:48 Larkin wrote: Well for 30 minutes of game 1 he looked like he could beat Polt. Then he left, tried an all in game 2, failed, then lost 2 ZvZ games against Revival. It was like he gave up when he saw those Ravens flying around and that was it for the whole day. | ||
|
yoloooooo
United States3 Posts
| ||
| ||
