EPT Registration costs 25 MLG credits ~ $18.75.
Dumbest thing I've read all day. And I've been browsing the internet for a few hours now.
MLG - WCS NA Season 1 - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
YourAdHere
United States216 Posts
Dumbest thing I've read all day. And I've been browsing the internet for a few hours now. | ||
|
TT1
Canada9976 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:07 MLG_Adam wrote: If the qualifier was free to enter a huge % of the matches would be no shows. We want this qualifier to be taken seriously by those wishing to participate. yea because limiting the qualis to gm players/high master leaguers only would have been too hard  | ||
|
a3den
704 Posts
| ||
|
SnoLys
149 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:13 LighT. wrote: If thats the sole case adam Why not a $20 registration fee with a $20 refunded once the players have played all their games and keeping $20 if they no-show? Seems practical. Unless you dont want to admit that youre wanting to profit off of this. Don't be a clown, MGL does not need to $5000 they would get from those players in any way. If you don't want to risk your $20, don't play. If you invested the time to get that good, back it up with $20. If not, move on and let someone who cares try out. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:15 ROOTT1 wrote: yea because limiting the qualis to gm players/high master leaguers only would have been too hard I don't think that would have prevented the no shows in any way. They would just be really highly ranked no shows. | ||
|
YourAdHere
United States216 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:16 Plansix wrote: Don't be a clown, MGL does not need to $5000 they would get from those players in any way. If you don't want to risk your $20, don't play. If you invested the time to get that good, back it up with $20. If not, move on and let someone who cares try out. Errr... then what's the problem of giving the money back to the players that show up then? | ||
|
LighT.
Canada4501 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:16 Plansix wrote: Don't be a clown, MGL does not need to $5000 they would get from those players in any way. If you don't want to risk your $20, don't play. If you invested the time to get that good, back it up with $20. If not, move on and let someone who cares try out. Who says I'm participating? I'm a casual watcher, I havent even touched HoTS outside of playing campaign and few custosm on my friends copy. If, according to MLG_Adam, that is the sole reason, wouldnt it be beneficial for my method rather than pocketing a cool $20 with the reason being "its incase they no show and dont take the tournament seriously"? If they have other justifiable reasons to charge the $20, then they should state it rather than giving off a poor reason or not say anything at all. By what you state, I still dont see why my idea isnt impractical. Enlighten me. | ||
|
TheSir
1830 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:07 MLG_Adam wrote: If the qualifier was free to enter a huge % of the matches would be no shows. We want this qualifier to be taken seriously by those wishing to participate. i dont agree with a lot of things MLG does or has done in the past but this makes perfect sense and i dont see why people would assume it would be free to enter. | ||
|
Tobblish
Sweden6404 Posts
| ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:19 TheSir wrote: i dont agree with a lot of things MLG does or has done in the past but this makes perfect sense and i dont see why people would assume it would be free to enter. Will GSL qualifiers are free. They don't charge people 20$ to attempt to qualify. They make a limit of points in masters to even be able to sign up. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On April 11 2013 02:32 ROOTT1 wrote: mlg likes money so do players. | ||
|
playa
United States1284 Posts
| ||
|
vesicular
United States1310 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:15 ROOTT1 wrote: yea because limiting the qualis to gm players/high master leaguers only would have been too hard But half the Koreans don't have NA accounts? | ||
|
grs
Germany2339 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:07 MLG_Adam wrote: If the qualifier was free to enter a huge % of the matches would be no shows. We want this qualifier to be taken seriously by those wishing to participate. I am really not hurt by this myself, but thinking other people are stupid, just adds insult to injury. | ||
|
dashiz
Costa Rica193 Posts
| ||
|
LighT.
Canada4501 Posts
As TT1 says, MLG likes money. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:19 LighT. wrote: Who says I'm participating? I'm a casual watcher, I havent even touched HoTS outside of playing campaign and few custosm on my friends copy. If, according to MLG_Adam, that is the sole reason, wouldnt it be beneficial for my method rather than pocketing a cool $20 with the reason being "its incase they no show and dont take the tournament seriously"? If they have other justifiable reasons to charge the $20, then they should state it rather than giving off a poor reason or not say anything at all. Ok, so its not your $20, so why do you care? He gave a reason and entry fees are nothing new. Everyone charges them for everything. As I stated before, my local pick up, armature lacrosse league charges $35 and the prize pool is $250 per person. The prize pool comes from sponsors(a local pizza chain and some other stuff). If people aren't invested enough to pay $20, then they didn't need to compete anyways. | ||
|
vesicular
United States1310 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:21 dashiz wrote: 20$ is a lot of money for low wealth people, I guess a lot of potential players will be lost because of this burden, but finding players with a lot of potential isn't the goal of this new events... oh wait. If you have any shot of getting through qualifiers, you have $20 to spare. | ||
|
LighT.
Canada4501 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:21 grs wrote: I am really not hurt by this myself, but thinking other people are stupid, just adds insult to injury. Well said. | ||
| ||
