EPTbosses dont pay their workers for doing nothing or doing anything else just not their job.
yeah my english sucks i hope you understand what im trying to say ^^
Eclypsia suspends SjoW - Page 13
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
sOOnMaNiAc
Germany57 Posts
bosses dont pay their workers for doing nothing or doing anything else just not their job. yeah my english sucks i hope you understand what im trying to say ^^ | ||
|
yeastiality
Canada374 Posts
I don't find anything interesting about it at all. Maybe if the players were getting paid real amounts of money.... | ||
|
Sorkoas
549 Posts
| ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
But after all, why post things like "Aww, Sjow! Common, we heart you get back to that ladder!!" or "I miss your stream, where are you??" or "go Sjow, we believe!!" when you can post things like (randomly taking the oneliners from page 3) "my god, drama again, let's go" or "Suspending players is one way for Eclypsia to make news and seem relevant I suppose. Such a joke team." or "I didn't even know that he got paid in the first place, did this really require a public announcement?" Good old SC2 General knows what's important.  | ||
|
skatblast
United States784 Posts
On October 24 2012 01:44 soiii wrote: "Our player does not perform, so lets just suspend him and bash him in an official statement" - Eclypsia surely stays the biggest joke team out there. Thats been known for awhile | ||
|
Champi
1422 Posts
Ruurk's statement: Sjow at the moment is not playing SC2. This means we cannot pay him for being a SC2 player. If SjoW wants to come back and play we will be glad to continue. If he doesn't however he will not be a paid member of Eclypsia. We believe we can resolve the issue so at the moment we have just ordered a suspension rather than removal. If SjoW wants to leave the team he is free to go. If he wants to return he is more than welcome but as it stands we cannot pay somebody who is not playing the game they are paid for. well, if this statement is true then it seems fair to me like, its not good for a team to punish a player for slumping and not producing results. everyone has dry spells. so at first i didnt really think it was fair, but in Ruurk's statement he says SjoW isnt even playing the game at all nothing wrong with slumping and still getting paid to keep you afloat so you can get back up on the high horse, but if you're not even playing the game and practicing why get paid? | ||
|
Seldentar
United States888 Posts
They've been a joke in my mind ever since April Fools. And I'm not one to normally criticize... As a matter of fact this is the first time I've ever posted anything about them as far as I can remember. :S For clarification in this case the mistake is making this public. We don't need to know about this... Things like this are private matters. | ||
|
NOOBALOPSE
Canada802 Posts
Or make up an excuse? | ||
|
Adamcakez
Australia12 Posts
| ||
|
nath
United States1788 Posts
On October 24 2012 08:55 sOOnMaNiAc wrote: its just normal to suspend a player who is not doing his work. bosses dont pay their workers for doing nothing or doing anything else just not their job. yeah my english sucks i hope you understand what im trying to say ^^ yeah but the boss doesn't go on a fucking forum or a newspaper and make a press release about it | ||
|
Sein
United States1811 Posts
On October 24 2012 08:55 sOOnMaNiAc wrote: its just normal to suspend a player who is not doing his work. bosses dont pay their workers for doing nothing or doing anything else just not their job. yeah my english sucks i hope you understand what im trying to say ^^ The problem here is not his suspension itself (even though there might be more story to it considering Sjow's post earlier in this thread), but that EC for some reason decided to make a public thread about it and did so in a pretty unprofessional manner: we can’t but regret his lack of results and motivation. Some may for example remember his elimination from the Battle at Ministry of Win in August right from the first group stage on a 0-2/1-4 score. This really isn't how you should be treating your players. | ||
|
Sumahi
Guam5609 Posts
| ||
|
ReignSupreme.
Australia4123 Posts
| ||
|
ppshchik
United States862 Posts
| ||
|
ShotgunMike
Sweden241 Posts
| ||
|
TheBloodyDwarf
Finland7524 Posts
On October 24 2012 11:10 Seldentar wrote: Anyone else feel like Eclypsia is constantly the example of what NOT to do if you're running a new team in SC2? They've been a joke in my mind ever since April Fools. And I'm not one to normally criticize... As a matter of fact this is the first time I've ever posted anything about them as far as I can remember. :S For clarification in this case the mistake is making this public. We don't need to know about this... Things like this are private matters. Well, i could put all my money line and say that if ec would not done this public there would be thread by SjoW or somebody else that he doesnt get paid. I know this community. This time ec was realy smart, they wanted less drama and shit talking about ec. If I would have been EC manager, I had make same. | ||
|
ellirc
Sweden3286 Posts
On October 24 2012 09:22 Cascade wrote: I skimmed through the 13 pages, and I didn't see a single post expressing regret that Sjow is inactive, or showing any kind of support for Sjow to get his motivation back. But after all, why post things like "Aww, Sjow! Common, we heart you get back to that ladder!!" or "I miss your stream, where are you??" or "go Sjow, we believe!!" when you can post things like (randomly taking the oneliners from page 3) "my god, drama again, let's go" or "Suspending players is one way for Eclypsia to make news and seem relevant I suppose. Such a joke team." or "I didn't even know that he got paid in the first place, did this really require a public announcement?" Good old SC2 General knows what's important. I'm sorry but have you even read the whole thread or are you blatantly taking for granted that this is what happened? Your post is incredibly ignorant and borderline stupid. What is your opinion? Stop trolling and get real. READ what people are posting. On October 24 2012 16:13 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: Well, i could put all my money line and say that if ec would not done this public there would be thread by SjoW or somebody else that he doesnt get paid. I know this community. This time ec was realy smart, they wanted less drama and shit talking about ec. If I would have been EC manager, I had make same. Oh come on. If they wouldn't have made this public in the first place, it would be very stupid of Sjow to do so himself. And it would hardly look bad for the EC manager if they mad a single post saying exactly what this OP says in such a thread. I'm so disappointed in this community. Normally I never comment on these things, I did earlier in this thread and then decided to just read what comes out. But it's impossible to keep quite when people are jumping to these stupid conclusions. | ||
|
Fueled
United States1610 Posts
We are very sorry for the inconvenience it may cause but we feel strongly about punishing a player who has not honored any of the commitments he had signed up for. Oh the irony... | ||
|
give.ViviD
Sweden235 Posts
| ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
| ||
