|
On May 29 2013 14:18 cravin74 wrote:
Would the schism close if all the titles are unified at the WCS grand finals since the rules are the same for all three titles? Technically, the UTC must be defended in a broadcasted match, while the others only need to be defended at a broadcasted tournament. But the UGC is definitely going to the WCS finals (not "grand finals", those are at the end of the year), depending on what happens in Proleague the UWC might as well...
|
|
|
just realized if IdrA played one last game and beat an unofficial champ then retire as champ forever 0__0
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On May 31 2013 17:20 Mvrio wrote:
just realized if IdrA played one last game and beat an unofficial champ then retire as champ forever 0__0
This is basically what everyone feared when Bear won the UWC. Fortunately we decided to count Code A qualifiers, or he'd still be champ probably
|
Bear would still be champ...possibly DESERVEDLY. 
|
I dont like the Code A games in there :/
|
On May 31 2013 17:36 Zeon0 wrote:
I dont like the Code A games in there :/
Well, in 2011 Code A was an actual tournament that you could win, then in 2012 it became the purely Code S qualifier it is now. I'm guessing it was kept in the UWC for consistency (which has been broken by including the Bear loss so I dunno) or because its brand as a tournament was already pretty embedded into our minds.
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On May 31 2013 17:41 slowbacontron wrote:Well, in 2011 Code A was an actual tournament that you could win, then in 2012 it became the purely Code S qualifier it is now. I'm guessing it was kept in the UWC for consistency (which has been broken by including the Bear loss so I dunno) or because its brand as a tournament was already pretty embedded into our minds.
Well the original rule was all broadcast major and premier tournaments, iirc.
Code A quals were broadcast that season, though only some of the games, and it's the qualifiers for a premier tournament. So it makes sense to count it, though it is kinda iffy.
|
On May 31 2013 17:23 lichter wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2013 17:20 Mvrio wrote:
just realized if IdrA played one last game and beat an unofficial champ then retire as champ forever 0__0 This is basically what everyone feared when Bear won the UWC. Fortunately we decided to count Code A qualifiers, or he'd still be champ probably
These titles look like boxing titles. I'm sure there are protocols for retiring champs in there.
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On May 31 2013 17:44 lichter wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2013 17:41 slowbacontron wrote:On May 31 2013 17:36 Zeon0 wrote:
I dont like the Code A games in there :/ Well, in 2011 Code A was an actual tournament that you could win, then in 2012 it became the purely Code S qualifier it is now. I'm guessing it was kept in the UWC for consistency (which has been broken by including the Bear loss so I dunno) or because its brand as a tournament was already pretty embedded into our minds. Well the original rule was all broadcast major and premier tournaments, iirc. Code A quals were broadcast that season, though only some of the games, and it's the qualifiers for a premier tournament. So it makes sense to count it, though it is kinda iffy.
Well the rule was specifically "Only tournaments played live/at a LAN and broadcasted on-location" which the qualifiers fit. As for only some of the games being broadcasted it would be stupid to exclude tournaments that don't broadcast every game because anything like MLG would not be counted.
edit: Also next defence is 3rd June vs. JangBi  2012-2013 Proleague/Round 6
|
I believe a Flash win and then Roro > Flash ace match is, at this point, the only hope of UWC going to the WCS finals, and thus unifying with the UGC. That's entirely possible, though...
|
United States97274 Posts
I didn't realize this was actually Flash's first time having the title. I thought he got it once a little while back for some reason.
|
I hope Flash can take the championship out of PL.
|
On May 31 2013 18:20 imallinson wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2013 17:44 lichter wrote:On May 31 2013 17:41 slowbacontron wrote:On May 31 2013 17:36 Zeon0 wrote:
I dont like the Code A games in there :/ Well, in 2011 Code A was an actual tournament that you could win, then in 2012 it became the purely Code S qualifier it is now. I'm guessing it was kept in the UWC for consistency (which has been broken by including the Bear loss so I dunno) or because its brand as a tournament was already pretty embedded into our minds. Well the original rule was all broadcast major and premier tournaments, iirc. Code A quals were broadcast that season, though only some of the games, and it's the qualifiers for a premier tournament. So it makes sense to count it, though it is kinda iffy. Well the rule was specifically "Only tournaments played live/at a LAN and broadcasted on-location" which the qualifiers fit. As for only some of the games being broadcasted it would be stupid to exclude tournaments that don't broadcast every game because anything like MLG would not be counted. edit: Also next defence is 3rd June vs. JangBi 2012-2013 Proleague/Round 6
oh sry, i meant Code A Qualifier, not actual Code A
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On June 01 2013 21:49 Zeon0 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2013 18:20 imallinson wrote:On May 31 2013 17:44 lichter wrote:On May 31 2013 17:41 slowbacontron wrote:On May 31 2013 17:36 Zeon0 wrote:
I dont like the Code A games in there :/ Well, in 2011 Code A was an actual tournament that you could win, then in 2012 it became the purely Code S qualifier it is now. I'm guessing it was kept in the UWC for consistency (which has been broken by including the Bear loss so I dunno) or because its brand as a tournament was already pretty embedded into our minds. Well the original rule was all broadcast major and premier tournaments, iirc. Code A quals were broadcast that season, though only some of the games, and it's the qualifiers for a premier tournament. So it makes sense to count it, though it is kinda iffy. Well the rule was specifically "Only tournaments played live/at a LAN and broadcasted on-location" which the qualifiers fit. As for only some of the games being broadcasted it would be stupid to exclude tournaments that don't broadcast every game because anything like MLG would not be counted. edit: Also next defence is 3rd June vs. JangBi 2012-2013 Proleague/Round 6 oh sry, i meant Code A Qualifier, not actual Code A
code a qualifiers were broadcasted
|
yeah, but I still think, its just a minor competition, which shouldnt count
my 2 cents
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
we have tournaments like the Samsung European Encounter included
it fits criteria fine, so it's included
|
 CranK defends the UGC against  aLive today, and tomorrow the winner of WCS America will be the UGC.
|
Bear is still the only true UTC! Long live Bear!
|
On May 31 2013 17:36 Zeon0 wrote:
I dont like the Code A games in there :/
I do :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
