EPTINTJ
Protoss
Myers Briggs personality & SC2 player data - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Drovix
United States6 Posts
INTJ Protoss | ||
|
Xanbatou
United States805 Posts
And here are my results: http://similarminds.com/jung.html Your type is: ISTJ Introverted (I) 51.72% Extroverted (E) 48.28% Sensing (S) 68.75% Intuitive (N) 31.25% Thinking (T) 83.87% Feeling (F) 16.13% Judging (J) 51.28% Perceiving (P) 48.72% I main Zerg. | ||
|
Shadrak
United States490 Posts
| ||
|
Black.
Brazil72 Posts
ENTP Zerg Diamond | ||
|
Phinix
United States116 Posts
I scoped that one out when I was first searching too,... it's interesting how many different tests are appealing/unappealing to different people. A lot of contributors have taken one test, not felt great about the result, taken another, researched the system and just determined themselves what they believe their type to be. I know it isn't the most perfectly scientific manner of data collection, but there are honestly holes all throughout this data acquisition if I were conducting this in a manner that required perfect, sterile input. - Right now I'm only polling forum-goers (I hope to find a way to broaden this eventually, though) - Only a certain type of person would be interested in these results. So we may simply have biased data because it's less likely for those not interested in the result to contribute to the project. - Data collection isn't standardized - some people know their score from a legit test, some take one of the suggested online tests, some take a guess based on researching the types,... I'm sure there is more than that escaping me now,... Regardless, I hope we will be able to extrapolate trends, evaluate the data and perhaps even attempt to compensate for the biases in the collected data. It will be fun to try! | ||
|
Wr3k
Canada2533 Posts
ENTP (all 4 strongly expressed) Zerg/Protoss Masters | ||
|
Xanbatou
United States805 Posts
On February 03 2011 05:27 Phinix wrote: I scoped that one out when I was first searching too,... it's interesting how many different tests are appealing/unappealing to different people. A lot of contributors have taken one test, not felt great about the result, taken another, researched the system and just determined themselves what they believe their type to be. I know it isn't the most perfectly scientific manner of data collection, but there are honestly holes all throughout this data acquisition if I were conducting this in a manner that required perfect, sterile input. - Right now I'm only polling forum-goers (I hope to find a way to broaden this eventually, though) - Only a certain type of person would be interested in these results. So we may simply have biased data because it's less likely for those not interested in the result to contribute to the project. - Data collection isn't standardized - some people know their score from a legit test, some take one of the suggested online tests, some take a guess based on researching the types,... I'm sure there is more than that escaping me now,... Regardless, I hope we will be able to extrapolate trends, evaluate the data and perhaps even attempt to compensate for the biases in the collected data. It will be fun to try! I dunno, I think it's mostly because whenever I've taken that test, it's always been from that site and I always have gotten the same thing, so it was surprising to get something different. However, on that note, if you want to get something as meaningful as possible from this, then I think people should stick to one test. I like the similarminds one because it sort of provides a gradient for if you are more one way or in the middle. | ||
|
alepov
Netherlands1132 Posts
On February 03 2011 04:51 Drowsy wrote: It's funny how INTJ is rare in the general populace. I remember in a class of 70 kids we all did this and only 2 of us and the professor were INTJ and the common ones were ENFP or ENFJ. Then when you get to the internet on practically any website, it reverses and INTJ suddenly becomes common. Did you also notice that intj/intp people often "find" each other in for example a class. Like 3/4 of the people are enfp enfj and esfj, and when there are mostly 1 or 2 intp/intj's, there's a big chance that they will befriend each other. Makes sense of course, but still funny.=) | ||
|
ktimekiller
United States690 Posts
Zerg intj | ||
|
Latedi
Sweden1027 Posts
INTJ Protoss/Trying Zerg | ||
|
OpAndroid
United States84 Posts
US Server Zerg Diamond INTJ Also, would be nifty if you did some correlations along the lines of play style. Like that personality code corresponds to a cheeser, or a person who plays macro oriented, or someone who goes for early all-ins, that sort of thing. | ||
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=80885 | ||
|
Phinix
United States116 Posts
On February 03 2011 05:30 Xanbatou wrote: However, on that note, if you want to get something as meaningful as possible from this, then I think people should stick to one test. I like the similarminds one because it sort of provides a gradient for if you are more one way or in the middle. I agree that the data would be more consistent with such a policy, but at this point I still need as much data as I can get; and discouraging people from noting their legitimate test, or a test they prefer over the one suggested might dwindle the contributions. What might be on the horizon, is our own test hosted on the website we're putting up. That way it's accessible enough that most people wont mind a few questions that they couldn't answer on impulse... and we could collaboratively tweak the test, if we figure out a means to do so effectively. | ||
|
ucbEntilZha
United States96 Posts
INTJ Zerg | ||
|
Treadmill
Canada2833 Posts
INFP Terran | ||
|
Phinix
United States116 Posts
On February 03 2011 05:36 GHOSTCLAW wrote: it's been done before: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=80885 Yes, I saw that just today and found it very interesting. I pointed it out to the followers of the Bnet thread as well. :-) That was done a bit differently, though. It was more of a poll. The data we're collecting is for correlative analysis of many many more variables... and hopefully in a way that allows multiple entities to contribute in multiple ways. Edit: But perhaps I can use that data as well,... if I'm able to determine Character Codes and/or Bnet URLs of the posters,... Anyone see an ethical issue with that, though? I feel like that's a gray area, pulling information that wasn't intended for this exact purpose,... | ||
|
dekuschrub
United States2069 Posts
INTJ terran | ||
|
Phinix
United States116 Posts
On February 03 2011 05:33 alepov wrote: Did you also notice that intj/intp people often "find" each other in for example a class. Like 3/4 of the people are enfp enfj and esfj, and when there are mostly 1 or 2 intp/intj's, there's a big chance that they will befriend each other. Makes sense of course, but still funny.=) As an introvert; it's natural to avoid the extroverts somewhat, I think. | ||
|
Impervious
Canada4213 Posts
I/E (pretty even) N/S (also pretty even) TP (both strong) Z and T Diamond | ||
|
quantumslip
United States188 Posts
(I/E)NFP Protoss | ||
| ||
