| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Asta
Germany3491 Posts
The totals obviously also equal the percentages of those races within your opponents due to the smart setup.  Surprisingly your ZvP winrate is the lowest. But I guess it is hard to figure out the balances from this pool because of the scaling. One can only estimate the tendencies that ZvP < 50% and ZvT > 50%. | ||
|
Monokeros
United States2493 Posts
 | ||
|
XsebT
Denmark2980 Posts
 I obbey. And I really like this one: 28. ZvP Win - Idra calls me a retard as he feebly 1 base all-ins me... LOL | ||
|
DeCoup
Australia1933 Posts
| ||
|
Kyuki
Sweden1867 Posts
Thanks alot, will prolly watch if I get hold of a beta key.. T_T | ||
|
wishbones
Canada2600 Posts
apm after? | ||
|
Klapdout
United States282 Posts
| ||
|
inReacH
Sweden1612 Posts
On February 23 2010 23:01 wishbones wrote: apm before? apm after? I'm actually making a point of watching the battles closely to see the unit interactions.. We take for granted that fact that in SC1 we can predict the winner of pretty much any battle but in SC2 sometimes I just have no idea until I see it. Long story short I'm not concerned with apm whatsoever | ||
|
Acies
Australia196 Posts
On February 23 2010 22:02 inReacH wrote: What's that website that let's you search for stuff on the internet again?  If only I knew where it was I could search for it. It's a vicious catch22. | ||
|
CakeOrI)eath
United States327 Posts
| ||
|
lowlypawn
United States241 Posts
| ||
TheFallofTroy
Canada780 Posts
| ||
|
danl9rm
United States3111 Posts
nice job though, 86-14 is impressive. even more so w/o sleep. | ||
|
Smuft
Canada318 Posts
| ||
|
khellian
Korea (South)922 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On February 23 2010 23:15 inReacH wrote: I'm actually making a point of watching the battles closely to see the unit interactions.. We take for granted that fact that in SC1 we can predict the winner of pretty much any battle but in SC2 sometimes I just have no idea until I see it. Long story short I'm not concerned with apm whatsoever I was wondering why the hell you played so solid and then just didn't micro AT ALL. Now I know | ||
|
inReacH
Sweden1612 Posts
On February 23 2010 23:59 danl9rm wrote: looks like that guy in game #74 found a counter to your roaches. he ended up having to push out slightly before he wanted since you scouted him, but it still worked. nice job though, 86-14 is impressive. even more so w/o sleep. No, lings don't counter roaches(it takes 50 hits for a lings to kill roaches not joking) All the things I did wrong this game made me have to take a short break and collect myself | ||
|
inReacH
Sweden1612 Posts
On February 24 2010 00:16 FrozenArbiter wrote: I was wondering why the hell you played so solid and then just didn't micro AT ALL. Now I know Haha I'm interested which games you are referring to so I can take a look, I still meant to control my units correctly otherwise it's obviously not an accurate unit interaction.. Maybe I was macroing but still I'd like to know which game? | ||
|
Orzabal
France287 Posts
| ||
|
Asta
Germany3491 Posts
37. ZvZ Win - 6 pool is bad Actually it wasn't bad at all! Right after you fended it off you were at 8 drones and he at 13 plus his queen was a little earlier and you made some extra lings probably out of fear. He just followed that up very badly - apparently he had never heard of roaches nor of destructible rocks before. So I guess the opening you did in that game is actually a bit risky. Even if you didn't die immediately, that difference in eco is pretty much a made game. So maybe it will be a little like in BW with the zvz openings. | ||
| ||
|
|
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
FEL
AI Arena Tournament
BSL: Ladder Tournament
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
