EPTNBA Finals 2017 - Page 10
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
bdonballer
United States408 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On June 10 2017 13:03 bdonballer wrote: It just takes an insane amount of 3's to beat the Warriors. Seriously though, how does Tristan Thompson never get offensive fouls for endless illegal screens and over the back fouls? It truly baffles me. He is the king of over the back, and it scares me. In related news, he was serviceable for the first time and they won. | ||
|
andyrau
13015 Posts
| ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13537 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
9078 Posts
| ||
|
Twinkle Toes
United States3605 Posts
| ||
|
andyrau
13015 Posts
how on earth do you even explain no call on this shit | ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
9078 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
| ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada18051 Posts
https://www.sportingcharts.com/nba/stats/individual-player-plus-minus-statistics/2016/ NBA playoff power rankings.. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/HbKpfON.jpg) | ||
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium7223 Posts
On June 10 2017 13:39 xDaunt wrote: No team was going to beat the Cavs tonight. Their shooting was too good, all other bullshit aside. I don't see them duplicating this. well but game 3 was pretty brutal for the cavs.it was like having 5 bases vs 3 then the oponent attacked your main and killed your production. | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada18051 Posts
On June 10 2017 23:22 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: well but game 3 was pretty brutal for the cavs.it was like having 5 bases vs 3 then the oponent attacked your main and killed your production. Gumiho won game 5 on 2 bases while his opponent had 4 bases and Tasteless had written Gumiho off. Cleveland needs to get Gumiho in there to come up with some strats. | ||
NonY
8751 Posts
On June 10 2017 15:18 andyrau wrote: https://streamable.com/ysiat how on earth do you even explain no call on this shit I'm not gonna try to defend the numerous bizarre refereeing incidents that went down, but at least for this one there's some plausibility. The ref is watching and from his angle you might imagine that he thought it was a possibility Klay's swipe actually made contact with the ball. Like from his perspective, Klay swiped for the ball, his hand disappeared behind the ball so the ref can't actually see if contact is made, next thing you know Kyrie lost control. Ref signals that Klay touched it, so no call. Then again, if refs were biased, then one way they'd act on it is by having all the calls with some uncertainty involved go the same way. So it doesn't really help to look at one call and say it's plausible. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
|
Elroi
Sweden5617 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9175 Posts
On June 10 2017 12:48 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote: Thompson came up after Livingston fouled him trying to draw the foul. Draymond was caught in the air. Not flagrant. Had to wait to see it again, but the way he jumped in to TT and came down on his head was clearly a flagrant. But it was draymond, so they didn't call it. | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada18051 Posts
| ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
9078 Posts
On June 11 2017 20:34 Scarecrow wrote: https://youtu.be/0ZfZuPt0iVM?t=9m50s Had to wait to see it again, but the way he jumped in to TT and came down on his head was clearly a flagrant. But it was draymond, so they didn't call it. He jumped straight up, expecting TT to keep momentum. When TT stopped, Draymond was caught in the air. After Livingston fouled him, TT stayed on the ground and then drew the foul by trying to shoot. Draymond couldn't stop his momentum even if he tried. It was not flagrant. No matter your leaning in the games, Draymond didn't intend to jump on his back. Anyone could have done the exact same move, and not be called. | ||
| ||
