EPT
now now this is Arsenal we talking about, just like it is written Spurs wont win anything anymore, it is all fact that Arsenal won't sign any new players, even though they are linked with many. They will keep Wenger no matter what and finish off the season with the "next year we will do it, we will win the league next season we are ready" xD2015 - 2016 Football Thread - Page 424
| Forum Index > Sports |
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
now now this is Arsenal we talking about, just like it is written Spurs wont win anything anymore, it is all fact that Arsenal won't sign any new players, even though they are linked with many. They will keep Wenger no matter what and finish off the season with the "next year we will do it, we will win the league next season we are ready" xD | ||
|
smr
Germany4808 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28908 Posts
 | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
On August 08 2016 22:10 Pandemona wrote: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/orxomQ3.png) Click the Banner to go to the site; Create an Account / Log in with last years details Create a team then Join The Team Liquid League Use; Join code: 1581913-388585 to find Team Liquid's League  any help, pm me | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
On August 12 2016 22:41 Liquid`Drone wrote: they've been top 4 for 20 years straight. Out of the top 4 leagues, only Bayern matches that. In said 20 years they have managed 2 trophies is it? Bayern have got what 20? I know your point you're making they aren't shit and Wenger is not a shit manager, but being 4th for so long or in the top 4 for such a long period its crazy they have not "improved" or you never say well this year Arsenal are going to do it or are scared when your team comes up against them. That shouldn't be the way. | ||
|
Faruko
Chile34173 Posts
they are probably making money without having to invest that much, so win-win for them, lose-lose for fans and the team the years they actually invested money, they won a few leagues and got to the finals of UCL, who would have thought that you have to invest something in order to win, CRAZY ! | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
Mou apparently wants another defender but has to sell first, don't know why the players who obviously weren't going to be part of the squad have not been sold yet, Mata, Schweinsteiger, etc. | ||
|
BeaTeR
Kazakhstan4130 Posts
only 4 participants... go everyone! join the league asap! | ||
|
smr
Germany4808 Posts
Cheers! Update the first post FOOL! | ||
|
BeaTeR
Kazakhstan4130 Posts
Better create new thread | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18462 Posts
On August 12 2016 19:29 bObaZ wrote: Except for Sevilla, what do you find funny in that ranking? And Chelsea that probably shouldn't be there In another news, rumours about Chelsea being interested in Lindelof. Please no! Go AWAY! Sevilla makes perfect sense. They may not look that strong, but they continuously destroy the Europa League... winning that for three years in a row has to count for something. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8930 Posts
| ||
|
sharkie
Austria18761 Posts
| ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
On August 13 2016 17:06 sneirac wrote: Eh but why do it this way, why have the referee look at a TV that has to be hoisted around instead of doing it like hockey and just show the video referee sitting in some broadcasting box. Should be faster too. Yeah they're all wired via headsets anyway, why make this awkward deal when you could have an extra ref just reviewing the footage? | ||
|
Kleinmuuhg
Vanuatu4091 Posts
| ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
On August 13 2016 17:45 Kleinmuuhg wrote: They argue that the decision should be made by the head referee. That argument makes perfect sense to the point where the head ref already gets told what happened by the linesmen/box refs if they saw something and then has to decide if he saw something different or agrees with their call. | ||
|
Kleinmuuhg
Vanuatu4091 Posts
On August 13 2016 17:57 sneirac wrote: That argument makes perfect sense to the point where the head ref already gets told what happened by the linesmen/box refs if they saw something and then has to decide if he saw something different or agrees with their call. Yeah I agree | ||
| ||
