EPTI dont think the "2 non-eu players every team" will not go through. Too much money included.
2013 - 2014 Football Thread - Page 828
| Forum Index > Sports |
Time to move on to the next thread http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sports/460943-2014-2015-football-thread | ||
|
Micro_Jackson
Germany2002 Posts
I dont think the "2 non-eu players every team" will not go through. Too much money included. | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
The other points i am happy, i want English players to get more chance at the highest level to improve that way, the number don't even seem that much and would be alot better. Increase the academy numbers of English players instead of bringing all foreign kids. Will be alot better that way. But saying you can only have two work permit based players which are by the way anyone outside the EU or not played at least i think 2 years in Europe? To not need a work permit, i forget the essential rulings for it. It just means if you buy a player direct from outside Europe your only allowed 2 of them in your squad which is not cool. I like the tighter work permits though, so the likes of Sunderland can't go buying from Uruguay some defenders who were poor by the way instead of giving chance to a youth defender if need be. I do laugh at this new league so all premier ship teams have a B team but then they go on to say well we are going to increase number of loan players for clubs from premiership to allowed up to 8 players loaned to one club...LOL. Will be no need for B teams if that is the case is there! #Facepalm On May 08 2014 22:32 Micro_Jackson wrote: "Half English" sound so wrong^^ I dont think the "2 non-eu players every team" will not go through. Too much money included. Yeah it will mean that your allowed 2players from outside European clubs in your squad. So Chelsea will be Oscar who we bought from Internationale and we have bought a few youngsters from Mexico and South America too, but they play for the reserves so i guess that wouldn't matter. | ||
|
Mensol
14536 Posts
It's fucking terrible. Only six foreigners can play in league. 6+0+4. You can only have six players on your 23 player roster. and that 4 is, other foreigners who will play as rotation. On May 08 2014 22:32 Pandemona wrote: The other points i am happy, i want English players to get more chance at the highest level to improve that way, the number don't even seem that much and would be alot better We got worse thanks to this system lol. We played semi final at World Cup 2002 and semi final at EURO 2008. Now we cant even qualify for these tournaments lool. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
http://talksport.com/football/exclusive-dyke-defends-fas-premier-league-b-team-proposal-14050890357 | ||
|
Craze
United States561 Posts
Soccernomics makes the argument that England has consistently punched above its weight already. edit: After listening to that interview I noticed the FA chair seems to get some pretty important facts wrong. If you look across Europe, the B teams don’t always all finish top of the league. That’s not what happens. The Barcelona B team doesn’t beat teams in the lower league, they finished 16th this year I believe. Barca B is in 3rd. | ||
|
Greg_J
China4409 Posts
I think i want one of these two teams to go up rather than Wigan or QPR. | ||
|
Greg_J
China4409 Posts
I do understand the point that it might help English players make the jump up into the Premier League and we definitely need better youth programs especially from the Premier League clubs who largely seem to have adopted a policy of buying the talent rather than training it. --- Brighton 1 Derby 1 edit: Cruel goal for Derby against Brighton as a shot comes back of the bar hitting the keeper in back and crossing the line. Brighton have probably been the better team but Derby lead 2:1 now. | ||
|
RvB
Netherlands6327 Posts
On May 08 2014 22:35 Mensol wrote: lol we have same system in Turkey. It's fucking terrible. Only six foreigners can play in league. 6+0+4. You can only have six players on your 23 player roster. and that 4 is, other foreigners who will play as rotation. We got worse thanks to this system lol. We played semi final at World Cup 2002 and semi final at EURO 2008. Now we cant even qualify for these tournaments lool. You've only had the rule for 1 or 2 years and your national team has been performing badly for longer than that. I don't think a rule for a few players of your own nationality is bad if it's coupled with a requirement to invest into your youth academy. Otherwise it won't work anwyay. | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
I mean Brighton on paper miles away from these 3 teams, big financial backgrounds and 2 very experienced managers. Yet Brighton showing their strength with a close game. I think Derby vs Wigan final and then its 50-50. Id rather Derby go up as they have better fan base and can actually sell their ground out for a game xD | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Craze
United States561 Posts
| ||
|
funkie
Venezuela9377 Posts
On May 09 2014 03:31 Craze wrote: Not a fan of the last bullet, or the timeline for this. England's academies need significant reform and I don't see them able to introduce enough quality by 2022 to keep the league at the current level since you have to start at very young ages. England doesn't produce the technical players that other countries do from their academies. Soccernomics makes the argument that England has consistently punched above its weight already. edit: After listening to that interview I noticed the FA chair seems to get some pretty important facts wrong. Barca B is in 3rd. http://www.lfp.es/liga-adelante FC Barcelona B is the B-Team of FC Barcelona. And they play "Liga Adelante", which is 2nd. Facts wrong heh? | ||
|
DaMuffinman
Germany1705 Posts
| ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom10027 Posts
On May 09 2014 05:18 Pandemona wrote: Ahh play offs such a magical time :D I mean Brighton on paper miles away from these 3 teams, big financial backgrounds and 2 very experienced managers. Yet Brighton showing their strength with a close game. I think Derby vs Wigan final and then its 50-50. Id rather Derby go up as they have better fan base and can actually sell their ground out for a game xD Derby can go and fuck themselves. | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Ahahahah  But i like playing vs Teams who can sell out their 30,000 stadiums  Even if Derby's is called something stupid lol. | ||
|
Pads
England3228 Posts
 | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom10027 Posts
On May 09 2014 18:33 Pandemona wrote: Id like them to get promoted again so Bamford can get some premier league experience under his belt. That kid can score at any level will make him one of the great England strikers and Chelsea Can't believe we sold him to you lot instead of offering him a place in the 1st team and a new contract. He even said he would stay if offered one. | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom10027 Posts
On May 09 2014 18:14 Pads wrote: Derby play beautiful, attacking football as well, and that's what's most important in the end Derby are utter fucking cunts. That's what matters to me. | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
On May 09 2014 19:01 Jockmcplop wrote: Can't believe we sold him to you lot instead of offering him a place in the 1st team and a new contract. He even said he would stay if offered one. Yeah another mistake by your club >.< He is so good! | ||
| ||
