EPTJust incredibly naive
The LiquidLegends Lounge - Page 1332
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
TheEmulator
28104 Posts
Just incredibly naive | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
| ||
|
nafta
Bulgaria18893 Posts
On July 05 2016 05:45 Numy wrote: I can understand someone thinking it's not all just casual sex but just for friends? What the hell! Pretty sure there are people like that just very rare. Logically if you go to a new town and want to meetup with random people your age just for a couple of drinks seems ok. I guess that isn't "just for friends" but close enough. | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
But the app is definitely best suited toward hook ups or sex friendships | ||
|
Nos-
Canada12016 Posts
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/NW6WGKS Short answers are completely fine I just need some information for this. | ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
It's a whole soundtrack because I have to pick up all yall's slacks. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
Against a skies deck it may be an off-colour Magmatic Chasm even? Now that I think about it, how does its ability work wrt, say Prowess? When Mournwillow enters the battlefield with Delirium turned on, and opponent controls a Niblis of Dusk, if a spell is cast in response to trigger Prowess the Niblis has power > 2 so it's not affected. But if the spell is cast after, does the Niblis become allowed to block because it's got power > 2, or does it remain unable to block because it received that clause when the ability resolved? The UR one is scary, ends games super fast in the right shell if left unchecked, nice finisher at uncommon. And of course Ride Down is a very cool card both in flavour and mechanics. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
If mournwillow etbs the trigger goes on the stack. If you pump anything including niblis in response it won't be affected when the trigger resolves. The BW uncommon from the cycle is missing. Wonder if it's at rare or related to sorin somehow. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
It's a cycle for limited, so it's an uncommon. I assume either it has to do with the story, or they gave it to another outlet so as not to give LR as many as 5 cards and it'll be spoiled sometimes later today. On the other hand, I can't help but be underwhelmed that the GB human Grim Flayer is at mythic rarity. Sure it's powerful and with a good start it could easily give you a 4/4 trample swinging on turn 3, but considering that's a constructed-playable card if GB/Delirium ever becomes a thing in standard, having yet another potential staple be at mythic rarity sucks. Mine won't be a full OST then. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On July 05 2016 21:47 WaveofShadow wrote: If mournwillow etbs the trigger goes on the stack. If you pump anything including niblis in response it won't be affected when the trigger resolves. It's actually much simpler than that. Mournwillow's ETB trigger doesn't selectively choose which creatures have power 2 or less on resolution (doing so would potentially have memory issues about what did and didn't have power 2 or less when the trigger resolved). Anything that has power 2 or less at Declare Blockers can't be declared as a blocker, and anything greater can. You could pump during Declare Attackers, and it would be a legal blocker, but you couldn't flash in Rattlechains and expect it to block. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
I'm really not liking this set much so far. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On July 06 2016 00:39 WaveofShadow wrote: Ugh. I'm really not liking this set much so far. We discussed this last night, but I think the flavor cards are a big hit, but the gameplay seems super ehh. | ||
|
Eppa!
Sweden4641 Posts
Time to write some twitch copy pasta. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
| ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
On July 06 2016 00:44 TheYango wrote: We discussed this last night, but I think the flavor cards are a big hit, but the gameplay seems super ehh. Less synergies, Emerge too slow for you, Escalate encouraging longer games for bigger effects too, that kind of things? | ||
|
Lord Tolkien
United States12084 Posts
On July 06 2016 01:28 Gahlo wrote: Apparently negligence doesn't matter when you're a political elite. It's a complex matter, but I've been saying this was going to be the outcome for many months, and for the same reasons that Comey has highlighted. Intent/Mens Rea is critical in this type of case and a criminal persecution in regards to classified documents is unprecedented on the basis of negligence. Unlike Petraeus where he knowingly handed classified info to his mistress/biographer, you have no evidence to show intent. And as Comey is the one recommending no indictment (though criticizing Clinton and the State Department for negligence), accusations of political bribery or shilling is absurd. He's one of the last persons to shirk from indicating Clinton if he could. BRB watching reddit and r/politics melt down. Trump/diehard Bernie supporters are going crazy that sites like Breitbart, infowars, and Fox were wrong and "MSM" like NYT, WSJ, and WaPo were right. | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On July 06 2016 02:59 Lord Tolkien wrote: BRB watching reddit and r/politics melt down. Trump/diehard Bernie supporters are going crazy that sites like Bretbiart, infowars, and Fox were wrong and "MSM" like NYT, WSJ, and WaPo were right. It's insane that people could look at this and think "if they indict her, we were right she's a criminal, if they don't we were right, she's corrupt." They built a bubble to insulate themselves from being wrong. The internet has become more and more right wing in popular sites because of heavy recruitment and probably a lot of false users in addition to just the increase in RW sentiment that comes when people are angry. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On July 06 2016 02:59 Lord Tolkien wrote: It's a complex matter, but I've been saying this was going to be the outcome for many months, and for the same reasons that Comey has highlighted. Intent/Mens Rea is critical in this type of case and a criminal persecution in regards to classified documents is unprecedented on the basis of negligence. Unlike Petraeus where he knowingly handed classified info to his mistress/biographer, you have no evidence to show intent. And as Comey is the one recommending no indictment (though criticizing Clinton and the State Department for negligence), accusations of political bribery or shilling is absurd. He's one of the last persons to shirk from indicating Clinton if he could. BRB watching reddit and r/politics melt down. Trump/diehard Bernie supporters are going crazy that sites like Bretbiart, infowars, and Fox were wrong and "MSM" like NYT, WSJ, and WaPo were right. Well, I wouldn't say those outlets were "right" considering they were parroting the narrative that there was no wrongdoing. But I do agree for the most part with Comey's assessment - criminal intent cannot be proven and thus no recommendation for that pursuit will be given. However, negligence was abundant. But I will continue to question the fact that anyone else would be (and likely has been) punished for such negligence, albeit maybe not criminally punished. Unfortunately, that negligence will most likely be neglected. *shrug* | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On July 06 2016 03:08 jcarlsoniv wrote: But I will continue to question the fact that anyone else would be (and likely has been) punished for such negligence, albeit maybe not criminally punished. Unfortunately, that negligence will most likely be neglected. *shrug* Well the punishment would be removal of access to classified info. but if you remove the secretary of state from classified info they cannot do their job. Once clinton is removed from politics she'll be stripped of her access for life most likely. She could be removed form office by the President or be impeached by congress, or convicted of a crime. but you can't remove a SoS's clearance while in office. | ||
| ||
