EPTOff-Topic General Discussion - Page 3823
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
Frolossus
United States4779 Posts
On December 31 2014 12:50 krndandaman wrote: http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/140918-natural-remedies this mill deck is legit. its nearly an auto win vs control decks and can actually put up a fight vs aggro decks. climbed from rank 7 to 3 today from it i've beaten it in fatigue wars a few times with control warrior haven't lost to it yet | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
Just beat a handlock on turn 5 with a Dr. Boom-less Firebat Rogue deck. 7-damage dagger and 6/2 mech on turn 4. lolol | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
Frolossus
United States4779 Posts
On December 31 2014 13:13 krndandaman wrote: thats surprising, control warrior is one of the easiest matchups for this deck. I haven't lost to it yet. hardest has been mech mage/zoolock but I've stolen a few wins from them. hunter is kinda difficult too. mulligan for your low mana drops and use spells liberally to empty out your hand and eventually the druid can't keep up with all the threats you throw down | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
XenOsky
Chile2358 Posts
| ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
lel | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
| ||
|
sung_moon
United States10110 Posts
On December 31 2014 12:50 krndandaman wrote: http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/140918-natural-remedies this mill deck is legit. its nearly an auto win vs control decks and can actually put up a fight vs aggro decks. climbed from rank 7 to 3 today from it Literally just built it and started running it just to dick around and finish my Druid quest. 3-0 atm, but it's been extremely favorable matchups. Barely beat a Druid after I luckily got him to mill a FoN (which if he had in hand, would of killed me), opening a BGH vs. a Handlock, and outlasting a Warrior with a clutch Tree of Life. Hilarious. No better feeling than going Oracle to draw into a Natrualize, then Brewmaster back Oracle. | ||
|
Ketara
United States15065 Posts
I've tried playing Hearthstone a bit the last week or so, and I just go ugh because like, I don't want to pay 30$ for the lich king cards. So dumb. Such a pay to win game. | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
On December 31 2014 14:48 Ketara wrote: I don't understand how you don't have Mukla in that deck. I've tried playing Hearthstone a bit the last week or so, and I just go ugh because like, I don't want to pay 30$ for the lich king cards. So dumb. Such a pay to win game. A card game?! That forces you to buy packs to remain competitive?! What outlandish behavior is this! I mean what kind of cruel monsters would do such a thing, lure people in and then release new cards later on that forces people to buy them so they can then in turn play with them! Seriously. Of all the Pay to win stupidity I've seen spouted on the internet this is by far the most hilariously unaware. This is better then being told exp boosts are pay to win. I am genuinely bemused and I'd like to know what card game you've played that is not like this? Digital or otherwise. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On December 31 2014 15:48 Parnage wrote: A card game?! That forces you to buy packs to remain competitive?! What outlandish behavior is this! I mean what kind of cruel monsters would do such a thing, lure people in and then release new cards later on that forces people to buy them so they can then in turn play with them! Seriously. Of all the Pay to win stupidity I've seen spouted on the internet this is by far the most hilariously unaware. This is better then being told exp boosts are pay to win. I am genuinely bemused and I'd like to know what card game you've played that is not like this? Digital or otherwise. I mean, at least for magic constructed you can pay for the cards you need, rather than buy boosters til you get the card you need. Or trade cards. | ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
On December 31 2014 15:53 wei2coolman wrote: I mean, at least for magic constructed you can pay for the cards you need, rather than buy boosters til you get the card you need. Or trade cards. Let's be real here, most cards you want in magic tend to get pretty damn pricey to a point that I know some people just buy a box rather then the cards they need as it's cheaper in the long run. Magic or hearthstone you'll be paying for something sooner or later. Trading eh you've got me on that. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
Kupon3ss
時の回廊10066 Posts
| ||
|
SnK-Arcbound
United States4423 Posts
On December 31 2014 16:01 Parnage wrote: Let's be real here, most cards you want in magic tend to get pretty damn pricey to a point that I know some people just buy a box rather then the cards they need as it's cheaper in the long run. Magic or hearthstone you'll be paying for something sooner or later. Trading eh you've got me on that. Or you could just draft, and pick up things that you need. I've watch nummy, and I don't know the last time he spent money on the game, and that isn't including the thousands of dollars he has in cards, which he could opt to sell if he doesn't want to put any money in. | ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
On December 31 2014 16:18 SnK-Arcbound wrote: Or you could just draft, and pick up things that you need. I've watch nummy, and I don't know the last time he spent money on the game, and that isn't including the thousands of dollars he has in cards, which he could opt to sell if he doesn't want to put any money in. I could say the same of hearthstone arena, if you play well in draft/arena yeah you'll earn what you spend and profit from it. You could argue magic draft is more forgiving because you keep the cards you draft but even the 0-3 arena still nets a pack. The methods may differ but again if you want to play a card game you'll have to pay and if you are not exceptional at it you'll be paying more then someone who isn't. Just the nature of the games themselves. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
| ||
| ||
