|
United States23745 Posts
On November 29 2014 04:44 Crusnik wrote:
The correct move now is allow it for that match since they already did, but if another team does it, it's a DQ for the rest of the tournament. Alternatively, you can redo Overpass, but I don't see DH taking that route.
Well they weren't breaking a rule by using the boost itself, but to achieve it they had to pixlewalk which IS against the rules. They should be punished for that.
|
I think a regame will happen, either that or straight DQ, I don't have a ton of faith in DH admins, but still, those are the only logical outcomes since it is clearly cheating.
On November 29 2014 04:48 onlywonderboy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2014 04:44 Crusnik wrote:
The correct move now is allow it for that match since they already did, but if another team does it, it's a DQ for the rest of the tournament. Alternatively, you can redo Overpass, but I don't see DH taking that route. Well they weren't breaking a rule by using the boost itself, but to achieve it they had to pixlewalk which IS against the rules. They should be punished for that.
The boost itself, looking at that picture, was illegal since one of the players had to pixel walk in the first place to get there iirc.
|
United Kingdom50293 Posts
The better solution is obvious, dq the fnatic player that stood on the pixel. They will 4v5 the semis and finals :>
|
28102 Posts
I mean, that would jsut make boring matches and ruin the rest of the viewer experience for fnatic games. I think a rematch upsets the least amount of fans so maybe DH admins should just do that.
|
On November 29 2014 04:50 Fusilero wrote:
The better solution is obvious, dq the fnatic player that stood on the pixel. They will 4v5 the semis and finals :>
But you have to use the same number of players as the opponent so LDLC will be forced to 4v4. It's in the rules!
|
United States23745 Posts
On November 29 2014 04:49 Crusnik wrote:I think a regame will happen, either that or straight DQ, I don't have a ton of faith in DH admins, but still, those are the only logical outcomes since it is clearly cheating. Show nested quote +On November 29 2014 04:48 onlywonderboy wrote:On November 29 2014 04:44 Crusnik wrote:
The correct move now is allow it for that match since they already did, but if another team does it, it's a DQ for the rest of the tournament. Alternatively, you can redo Overpass, but I don't see DH taking that route. Well they weren't breaking a rule by using the boost itself, but to achieve it they had to pixlewalk which IS against the rules. They should be punished for that. The boost itself, looking at that picture, was illegal since one of the players had to pixel walk in the first place to get there iirc.
I think we're just talking semantics here. The boost is illegal because it required pixel walking, but if they had been able to reach the boost without pixel walking it would have been legal. That's all I meant. Interested to see what DH decides. Guess I chose an interesting time to start watching CS:GO ha.
|
What do you call a boost in CS to begin with?
|
Standing on another player is the basics, you can do it in most other FPS's, Halo, BF, I think CoD (not sure on this one, don't feel like loading it up and grabbing a friend to test it)
|
United Kingdom50293 Posts
The call will be made after navi vs dig so hold your popcorn lads
|
On November 29 2014 04:53 Numy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2014 04:50 Fusilero wrote:
The better solution is obvious, dq the fnatic player that stood on the pixel. They will 4v5 the semis and finals :> But you have to use the same number of players as the opponent so LDLC will be forced to 4v4. It's in the rules!
Please, we can't all be that godly at tournaments.
|
hunter doesn't need more bs cards :/
|
Never use gameservers, my teamspeak server has dropped around 20 times since 8PM last night....
|
On November 29 2014 05:02 Frolossus wrote:
hunter doesn't need more bs cards :/
All these rogue cards make me so sad. Even the 2-drop that buff your weapon isn't anything particularly strong. T_T
|
On November 29 2014 05:05 Alaric wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2014 05:02 Frolossus wrote:
hunter doesn't need more bs cards :/ All these rogue cards make me so sad. Even the 2-drop that buff your weapon isn't anything particularly strong. T_T
i'd love to see something like gladiators longbow for rogue
|
On November 29 2014 04:35 TheEmulator wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2014 04:32 onlywonderboy wrote:On November 29 2014 04:30 red_ wrote:
Well props to Devilwalk to being 100% honest and saying he feels sorry for LDLC that they're the team they busted it out against knowing it's basically impossible to stop and that it was 2nd half. Yeah, I pretty much agree with everything he said. Impressive they found that spot but man fuck that. It was actually some random guy who uploaded it to youtube that found it. Fnatic contacted him and he removed the video for a while so they could use it without anyone finding out.
Here is the direct post/source if anyone is interested about where that info comes from:
http://www.reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/comments/2nosf5/fnatics_overpass_boost_vs_ldlc_dhw2014/cmfgmco
|
On November 29 2014 05:05 Alaric wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2014 05:02 Frolossus wrote:
hunter doesn't need more bs cards :/ All these rogue cards make me so sad. Even the 2-drop that buff your weapon isn't anything particularly strong. T_T
At least it seems like they trying to bring tempo rogue back even if the cards have been lackluster so far. Used to LOVE playing tempo rogue 
|
I loved it too but it ran out of steam so fast and the Naxx cards look like they shit all over tempo rogue and aggro decks both (or at least decks that aren't already allowed by it). Even the assassination card, Deadly Shot can be stupidly strong in a lot of situations, but the new card costs more because it has an extra effect, for which you need to pay extra mana which adds to its actual cost. And the combo effect itself is super situational.
I'm really not sold on that card because even if the meta favored some weapon warrior/rogue/shaman decks, they'd probably run Harrison Jones instead. :/
|
In other news Lifecoach just 3-0ed Dog with miracle druid. Seems pretty strong.
|
On November 29 2014 05:35 Numy wrote:
In other news Lifecoach just 3-0ed Dog with miracle druid. Seems pretty strong.
it is really strong
i've gone up a few ranks in a day with it
auctioneer at 10 mana for druid means you draw your whole deck
|
It's a pity I have no Lores otherwise I would try out Druid class more. It seems like a board control orientated spin of miracle. I know Miracle rogue players tried the same thing but with mixed results. Maly rogue or deckhand both seem to be stronger than the violet teacher board control one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
