|
On January 28 2017 23:52 Charoisaur wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 23:50 sneakyfox wrote: Just stop nerfing stuff and let the meta develop until you really sure it's absolutely necessary.
One of greatest things about Starcraft is someone inventing a way around a perceived disadvantage. Moves the game forward. I don't care about balance I just want the meta to be fun. This collossus turtle style isn't fun imo. If to compensate some other numbers need to be adjusted then so be it.
I agree with that for the same reason i want colossi/SH to be removed from the game
|
Austria24416 Posts
On January 28 2017 23:55 Charoisaur wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 23:54 Olli wrote: If you want the meta to be fun then you should have been against the widow mine patch 3 years ago I was and I suggested multiple times that it should be reverted. But now it's to late imo with all the zealot buffs.
I don't see why, chargelots got a few buffs but Terran isn't the exact same either. And you could always adjust zealots to fit the new game. Charge/templar is way too cool to just let die.
|
On January 28 2017 23:56 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 23:34 GumBa wrote:On January 28 2017 23:33 Shellshock wrote: Zest told me he's ~ 70% confident against Innovation I heard Inno practices vs Shuras protoss. He even managed to get 35% vs it so he has a slight chance. the Scarlettian is a function of A->B that takes WR in practice and returns WR in tournaments. The general formula of the function is: S(x)=10/77*sqrt((logx+1)/(1-log(10/7)))*x http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=S(x)=10/77*sqrt((log(x)+1)/(1-log(10/7)))*xThe INnoVation is a point defined as S(7/10)=1/11 You should talk maths with The_templar I'm sure you two would get along
|
United States97274 Posts
On January 28 2017 23:57 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 23:56 Ej_ wrote:On January 28 2017 23:34 GumBa wrote:On January 28 2017 23:33 Shellshock wrote: Zest told me he's ~ 70% confident against Innovation I heard Inno practices vs Shuras protoss. He even managed to get 35% vs it so he has a slight chance. the Scarlettian is a function of A->B that takes WR in practice and returns WR in tournaments. The general formula of the function is: S(x)=10/77*sqrt((logx+1)/(1-log(10/7)))*x http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=S(x)=10/77*sqrt((log(x)+1)/(1-log(10/7)))*xThe INnoVation is a point defined as S(7/10)=1/11 You should talk maths with The_templar I'm sure you two would get along probably not unless Ej is really into Cardstone
|
Aw I thought it was Toodming for a sec Definitely the more interesting zerg imo
|
On January 28 2017 23:58 Shellshock wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 23:57 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 28 2017 23:56 Ej_ wrote:On January 28 2017 23:34 GumBa wrote:On January 28 2017 23:33 Shellshock wrote: Zest told me he's ~ 70% confident against Innovation I heard Inno practices vs Shuras protoss. He even managed to get 35% vs it so he has a slight chance. the Scarlettian is a function of A->B that takes WR in practice and returns WR in tournaments. The general formula of the function is: S(x)=10/77*sqrt((logx+1)/(1-log(10/7)))*x http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=S(x)=10/77*sqrt((log(x)+1)/(1-log(10/7)))*xThe INnoVation is a point defined as S(7/10)=1/11 You should talk maths with The_templar I'm sure you two would get along probably not unless Ej is really into Cardstone he likes Heroes, pretty much the same level
|
On January 29 2017 00:00 Alchemik wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 23:58 Shellshock wrote:On January 28 2017 23:57 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On January 28 2017 23:56 Ej_ wrote:On January 28 2017 23:34 GumBa wrote:On January 28 2017 23:33 Shellshock wrote: Zest told me he's ~ 70% confident against Innovation I heard Inno practices vs Shuras protoss. He even managed to get 35% vs it so he has a slight chance. the Scarlettian is a function of A->B that takes WR in practice and returns WR in tournaments. The general formula of the function is: S(x)=10/77*sqrt((logx+1)/(1-log(10/7)))*x http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=S(x)=10/77*sqrt((log(x)+1)/(1-log(10/7)))*xThe INnoVation is a point defined as S(7/10)=1/11 You should talk maths with The_templar I'm sure you two would get along probably not unless Ej is really into Cardstone he likes Heroes, pretty much the same level I'm a renaissance man
|
|
wow what a useless attack, he killed a queen for completely free. stupid zest
|
|
United States97274 Posts
Zest just trying to see if he can do whatever he wants against iasonu
|
On January 29 2017 00:03 Ej_ wrote: wow what a useless attack, he killed a queen for completely free. stupid zest And an overlord
|
Without Wardi and TakeTV the IEM coverage doesn't look so hot.
Emil hype I guess.
Edit: Oh wait it's Zedd.
|
it'd work pretty well, had iA not made a safety roach warren
|
Zest lost a DT, so it wasn't completely for free.
|
1 hp prism is where you just allin, type "great matchup, WP" and alt+f4
|
On January 29 2017 00:04 Musicus wrote: Without Wardi and TakeTV the IEM coverage doesn't look so hot.
Emil hype I guess.
Edit: Oh wait it's Zedd. plz don't mistake The Bald God for Emil ever again
|
Time for so Zealots to counter the Swarmhosts.
|
On January 29 2017 00:04 Musicus wrote: Without Wardi and TakeTV the IEM coverage doesn't look so hot.
Emil hype I guess.
Edit: Oh wait it's Zedd. Emil is also doing Shoutcraft. The IEM qualifiers this time are a mess -.-
|
On January 28 2017 23:56 Fango wrote: I always doubt iAsonu and people tell me I'm wrong
there's an official chinese broadcast now and having chinese players is a good draw. I'd rather have a chinese player who ladder on KR regularly instead of a mid tier NA/EU player
|
|
|
|