EPTOn August 10 2016 21:35 Durnuu wrote:
Gotta do math now, total supply - army supply = worker
Gotta do math now, total supply - army supply = worker
army supply doesn't consider units in production
[GSL] Code S Season 2 2016 - Ro16 Group A - Page 43
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Charoisaur
Germany15880 Posts
army supply doesn't consider units in production | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51456 Posts
On August 10 2016 21:36 Pandemona wrote: | ||
|
Elentos
55459 Posts
On August 10 2016 21:36 The_Red_Viper wrote: Meh i actually agree with him on that  I think it's really fake and if you can't make a decent story with the information on screen you're not doing a great job casting | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51456 Posts
| ||
|
Durnuu
13319 Posts
On August 10 2016 21:37 Charoisaur wrote: army supply doesn't consider units in production Then you gotta calculate the army supply in production as well (if the production is even up haha) | ||
|
slit
Spain212 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 10 2016 21:37 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: I say we just cover half the screen with a black square Even more added tension because you can't see the complete fight Unreasonable comments like this don't prove anything | ||
|
Penev
28453 Posts
Did you for real LB Taeja?  | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51456 Posts
On August 10 2016 21:38 slit wrote: So, if I get this straight (just stating thread facts) Taeja lost a game vs Zest because he's the actual inferior player and won two because Zest, the actual superior player, played really bad? No credit to Taeja at all? Yes, im glad you understood :D Think when Spain lost to Switzerland in the 2010 World Cup xd | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
This cheerful is factually wrong. | ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
Well Putin has something to say about that | ||
|
Elentos
55459 Posts
| ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
It's like that time Rotterdam bet money on TNC to 2-0 OG | ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
8960 Posts
| ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany15880 Posts
On August 10 2016 21:38 slit wrote: So, if I get this straight (just stating thread facts) Taeja lost a game vs Zest because he's the actual inferior player and won two because Zest, the actual superior player, played really bad? No credit to Taeja at all? imo it's the other way. TaeJa won 2 games because he's the superior player and lost 1 map because he played bad | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 10 2016 21:37 Elentos wrote: I think it's really fake and if you can't make a decent story with the information on screen you're not doing a great job casting The problem is that everybody is accustomed to having all this information atm. But imo gameplay alone should be enough to watch the game. Show both povs, maybe supply and everything else is told by actual gameplay on screen. | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51456 Posts
On August 10 2016 21:39 Ej_ wrote: It's like that time Rotterdam bet money on TNC to 2-0 OG Haha | ||
|
Elentos
55459 Posts
On August 10 2016 21:38 slit wrote: So, if I get this straight (just stating thread facts) Taeja lost a game vs Zest because he's the actual inferior player and won two because Zest, the actual superior player, played really bad? No credit to Taeja at all? The thread clearly said that TaeJa lost that game against Zest because Protoss is imbalanced, you have to pay more attention. | ||
|
Penev
28453 Posts
| ||
|
Silvana
3713 Posts
On August 10 2016 21:38 slit wrote: So, if I get this straight (just stating thread facts) Taeja lost a game vs Zest because he's the actual inferior player and won two because Zest, the actual superior player, played really bad? No credit to Taeja at all? Yes. But some credit must be given to Taeja for playing well despite his semi-retired status! Just no "omg tarja is a god of TvP now". | ||
| ||
