|
On March 06 2016 01:39 Wintex wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:26 [PkF] Wire wrote:On March 06 2016 01:26 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 06 2016 01:25 Garnet wrote:
All these region locks and foreigners STILL can't win. They won a WCS last year. :D Then went 0-3. I'm pretty confident a foreigner will take a WCS this year ptitdrogo
I meant one of the 3 championship events
|
On March 06 2016 01:38 Darkhorse wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:35 Dodgin wrote:On March 06 2016 01:33 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:30 Elentos wrote:No final shoutout to the TL PR though, bit disappointing. He tried so hard to prove Soularion wrong, too  My favorite thing is when writers make predictions based on recent trends and recent stats and people get hella salty and then really smug if the writer turns out to be wrong Makes you wonder what people want you to base your predictions on Polt at #5 was silly, because It's Polt at a high stakes offline event, he plays near 100% of his level while other players play at 80% of their level. Oh I think you know that I would've had Polt at number 1  But I also can't blame someone for trying to do it by the numbers
if(offline event){polt = polt*150;}
|
On March 06 2016 01:38 Musicus wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:34 Diabolique wrote:
The great result of this tournament is, that out of the 8 foreigners at BlizzCon, 2 will make sense (I am sure, Snute got enough WCS points to get there with some other minor victories). Snute and Polt definitely belong to BlizzCon.
But who else? OK, maybe Hydra, but he is not THE star. But what about the other five? Everybody else will be ROFLstomped at BlizzCon. So who will be the other five? Consistently good? I really don't know. Maybe MarineLord, Nerchio? But they are not the top class. MarineLorD, Nerchio, ShoWTimE, Hydra would be my bet and they all can be as strong as Snute imo. Other than that I think Vortix will actually somehow make it and he can be super good too. Too bad he could not play this time. Then another frenchie like Lilbow, Drogo, Dayshi or FireCake will probably make it. Solid enough imo, although a few of them will get stomped.
Yes, they are good (ShowTime, Nerchio), but they are not at the Korean level. Snute can easily lose to them, but when he plays the Koreans, he somehow switches to the higher speed and is able to sometimes beat them. I can't say that about any other top foreigner.
|
On March 06 2016 01:39 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:39 Wintex wrote:On March 06 2016 01:26 [PkF] Wire wrote:On March 06 2016 01:26 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 06 2016 01:25 Garnet wrote:
All these region locks and foreigners STILL can't win. They won a WCS last year. :D Then went 0-3. I'm pretty confident a foreigner will take a WCS this year ptitdrogo I meant one of the 3 championship events
france
|
On March 06 2016 01:40 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:38 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:35 Dodgin wrote:On March 06 2016 01:33 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:30 Elentos wrote:No final shoutout to the TL PR though, bit disappointing. He tried so hard to prove Soularion wrong, too My favorite thing is when writers make predictions based on recent trends and recent stats and people get hella salty and then really smug if the writer turns out to be wrong Makes you wonder what people want you to base your predictions on Polt at #5 was silly, because It's Polt at a high stakes offline event, he plays near 100% of his level while other players play at 80% of their level. Oh I think you know that I would've had Polt at number 1 But I also can't blame someone for trying to do it by the numbers if(offline event){polt = polt*150;}
x150??? lol jesus, are you sure you didn't mean x1.5?
|
Australia18228 Posts
On March 06 2016 01:40 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:38 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:35 Dodgin wrote:On March 06 2016 01:33 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:30 Elentos wrote:No final shoutout to the TL PR though, bit disappointing. He tried so hard to prove Soularion wrong, too My favorite thing is when writers make predictions based on recent trends and recent stats and people get hella salty and then really smug if the writer turns out to be wrong Makes you wonder what people want you to base your predictions on Polt at #5 was silly, because It's Polt at a high stakes offline event, he plays near 100% of his level while other players play at 80% of their level. Oh I think you know that I would've had Polt at number 1 But I also can't blame someone for trying to do it by the numbers if(offline event){polt = polt*150;}
You would place him at rank 750?
|
On March 06 2016 01:41 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:40 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 06 2016 01:38 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:35 Dodgin wrote:On March 06 2016 01:33 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:30 Elentos wrote:No final shoutout to the TL PR though, bit disappointing. He tried so hard to prove Soularion wrong, too My favorite thing is when writers make predictions based on recent trends and recent stats and people get hella salty and then really smug if the writer turns out to be wrong Makes you wonder what people want you to base your predictions on Polt at #5 was silly, because It's Polt at a high stakes offline event, he plays near 100% of his level while other players play at 80% of their level. Oh I think you know that I would've had Polt at number 1 But I also can't blame someone for trying to do it by the numbers if(offline event){polt = polt*150;} x150??? lol jesus, are you sure you didn't mean x1.5?
yeah the classical mistake all my students keep doing 
|
On March 06 2016 01:41 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:41 Die4Ever wrote:On March 06 2016 01:40 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 06 2016 01:38 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:35 Dodgin wrote:On March 06 2016 01:33 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:30 Elentos wrote:No final shoutout to the TL PR though, bit disappointing. He tried so hard to prove Soularion wrong, too My favorite thing is when writers make predictions based on recent trends and recent stats and people get hella salty and then really smug if the writer turns out to be wrong Makes you wonder what people want you to base your predictions on Polt at #5 was silly, because It's Polt at a high stakes offline event, he plays near 100% of his level while other players play at 80% of their level. Oh I think you know that I would've had Polt at number 1 But I also can't blame someone for trying to do it by the numbers if(offline event){polt = polt*150;} x150??? lol jesus, are you sure you didn't mean x1.5? yeah the classical mistake all my students keep doing
No, it's Polt.
|
On March 06 2016 01:42 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:41 [PkF] Wire wrote:On March 06 2016 01:41 Die4Ever wrote:On March 06 2016 01:40 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 06 2016 01:38 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:35 Dodgin wrote:On March 06 2016 01:33 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:30 Elentos wrote:No final shoutout to the TL PR though, bit disappointing. He tried so hard to prove Soularion wrong, too My favorite thing is when writers make predictions based on recent trends and recent stats and people get hella salty and then really smug if the writer turns out to be wrong Makes you wonder what people want you to base your predictions on Polt at #5 was silly, because It's Polt at a high stakes offline event, he plays near 100% of his level while other players play at 80% of their level. Oh I think you know that I would've had Polt at number 1 But I also can't blame someone for trying to do it by the numbers if(offline event){polt = polt*150;} x150??? lol jesus, are you sure you didn't mean x1.5? yeah the classical mistake all my students keep doing No, it's Polt.
wow *150 is a lot ^^
especially given that he beat sOs offline I think
|
On March 06 2016 01:43 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:42 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 06 2016 01:41 [PkF] Wire wrote:On March 06 2016 01:41 Die4Ever wrote:On March 06 2016 01:40 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 06 2016 01:38 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:35 Dodgin wrote:On March 06 2016 01:33 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:30 Elentos wrote:No final shoutout to the TL PR though, bit disappointing. He tried so hard to prove Soularion wrong, too My favorite thing is when writers make predictions based on recent trends and recent stats and people get hella salty and then really smug if the writer turns out to be wrong Makes you wonder what people want you to base your predictions on Polt at #5 was silly, because It's Polt at a high stakes offline event, he plays near 100% of his level while other players play at 80% of their level. Oh I think you know that I would've had Polt at number 1 But I also can't blame someone for trying to do it by the numbers if(offline event){polt = polt*150;} x150??? lol jesus, are you sure you didn't mean x1.5? yeah the classical mistake all my students keep doing No, it's Polt. wow *150 is a lot ^^
Polt vs. Classic g4.
Sadly he still lost the series, but like... Polt's still super clutch.
|
On March 06 2016 01:44 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:43 [PkF] Wire wrote:On March 06 2016 01:42 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 06 2016 01:41 [PkF] Wire wrote:On March 06 2016 01:41 Die4Ever wrote:On March 06 2016 01:40 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 06 2016 01:38 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:35 Dodgin wrote:On March 06 2016 01:33 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:30 Elentos wrote:No final shoutout to the TL PR though, bit disappointing. He tried so hard to prove Soularion wrong, too My favorite thing is when writers make predictions based on recent trends and recent stats and people get hella salty and then really smug if the writer turns out to be wrong Makes you wonder what people want you to base your predictions on Polt at #5 was silly, because It's Polt at a high stakes offline event, he plays near 100% of his level while other players play at 80% of their level. Oh I think you know that I would've had Polt at number 1 But I also can't blame someone for trying to do it by the numbers if(offline event){polt = polt*150;} x150??? lol jesus, are you sure you didn't mean x1.5? yeah the classical mistake all my students keep doing No, it's Polt. wow *150 is a lot ^^ Polt vs. Classic g4. Sadly he still lost the series, but like... Polt's still super clutch.
that biomech timing he did on Overgrowth still haunts me. Such a thing of beauty, even Classic who's not the last one to do unusual builds was left speechless.
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
Snute still hasn't won something TL considers a Premier tournament since 2012. Such a shame.
|
On March 06 2016 01:46 Elentos wrote:
Snute still hasn't won something TL considers a Premier tournament since 2012. Such a shame.
To be fair, I believe there have been three non-Korean premier wins since 2012, no?
|
that biomech timing he did on Overgrowth still haunts me. Such a thing of beauty, even Classic who's not the last one to do unusual builds was left speechless.
Which Tournament?
|
On March 06 2016 01:48 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:46 Elentos wrote:
Snute still hasn't won something TL considers a Premier tournament since 2012. Such a shame. To be fair, I believe there have been three non-Korean premier wins since 2012, no?
yeah Bunny Sen and Lilbow and that's it I think.
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
On March 06 2016 01:48 CrimeCat wrote:
that biomech timing he did on Overgrowth still haunts me. Such a thing of beauty, even Classic who's not the last one to do unusual builds was left speechless.
Which Tournament?
Blizzcon 2014
|
France13023 Posts
On March 06 2016 01:35 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:33 Darkhorse wrote:On March 06 2016 01:30 Elentos wrote:No final shoutout to the TL PR though, bit disappointing. He tried so hard to prove Soularion wrong, too My favorite thing is when writers make predictions based on recent trends and recent stats and people get hella salty and then really smug if the writer turns out to be wrong Makes you wonder what people want you to base your predictions on Mojo People want to be sold magic, not scientific stuff. People do not want to think, to be rational, to have solid grounds for things ; they want gambles, randomness, unexplained stuff that leaves room for magical/supernatural interpretation. Why do you think RNG games have such success?
How is it logic to put a foreigner #1 tho, Stephano is retired
|
On March 06 2016 01:48 CrimeCat wrote:
that biomech timing he did on Overgrowth still haunts me. Such a thing of beauty, even Classic who's not the last one to do unusual builds was left speechless.
Which Tournament?
Blizzcon 2014 Polt - Classic g4, go watch it immediately on Youtube if you never saw it
|
On March 06 2016 01:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:48 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 06 2016 01:46 Elentos wrote:
Snute still hasn't won something TL considers a Premier tournament since 2012. Such a shame. To be fair, I believe there have been three non-Korean premier wins since 2012, no? yeah Bunny Sen and Lilbow and that's it I think.
What about PTITBROGO?
|
On March 06 2016 01:50 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2016 01:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:On March 06 2016 01:48 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 06 2016 01:46 Elentos wrote:
Snute still hasn't won something TL considers a Premier tournament since 2012. Such a shame. To be fair, I believe there have been three non-Korean premier wins since 2012, no? yeah Bunny Sen and Lilbow and that's it I think. What about PTITBROGO?
was it Premier ?
EDIT : yeah it was, I guess that makes it 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
