|
On September 22 2015 20:47 Tiaraju9 wrote:
We need sOs at Blizzcon.
I love sOs, but by God, he only offers shitshow finals
|
On September 22 2015 20:49 DarkLordOlli wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2015 20:49 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:45 DarkLordOlli wrote:On September 22 2015 20:44 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:42 DarkLordOlli wrote:On September 22 2015 20:41 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:39 DarkLordOlli wrote:On September 22 2015 20:38 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:35 boxerfred wrote:On September 22 2015 20:34 DarkLordOlli wrote:
Slight advantage for sOs with these builds Why? Honest question. I thought it's Robo > Twilight > Stargate > Robo. Zest definitely had the upper hand in terms of build orders with the earlier Nexus. And the only thing sOs' blink investment accomplished was delaying his Forge and Robo Bay. The nexus timing was basically identical, the only difference was the followup. sOs went stalkers and twilight council, Zest opted for 3 gates first and then a robo with 3 sentries. "basically identical" haha you're funny It was 1gate nexus from both I can't tell if you don't understand the game or you're trying to troll. Zest's Nexus was about 12 sec earlier. It was 1gate nexus from both I understand that StarCraft is a complex and hard game to understand for some people, but please get your shit together. Yes, they were both making a Nexus having just 1 gate and a msc; "1gate nex", but they went about it very differently. sOs mined much more gas while Zest just mined enough to be able to afford msc warp gate research and so their nexus timings weren't indentical at all. 2 probes is a big fucking deal. No it isn't.
in late game, no
in early game, yes
|
Most Protoss players pull bullshit. sOs pulls shenanigans. That is why sOs is more likeable
|
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On September 22 2015 20:50 Phredxor wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2015 20:49 deacon.frost wrote:
OK, what happened, had to go for lunch. sOs going hard for the reverse all-kill!
But how? What have he done to win against Zest(again)?
|
On September 22 2015 20:49 deacon.frost wrote:
OK, what happened, had to go for lunch.
Double warp prism drop in the pocket natulal with colossus and zealots. Big warpin as well, killing units and the nexus.
Meanwhile sOs is posturing outside the third, so Zest can't go home to defend.
|
On September 22 2015 20:50 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
Most Protoss players pull bullshit. sOs pulls shenanigans. That is why sOs is more likeable
Lilbow > sOs
|
On September 22 2015 20:51 deacon.frost wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2015 20:50 Phredxor wrote:On September 22 2015 20:49 deacon.frost wrote:
OK, what happened, had to go for lunch. sOs going hard for the reverse all-kill! But how? What have he done to win against Zest(again)?
he played smarter
|
sOs seriously seems to be rounding into form for blizzcon. getting ready for that 100k apparently. he looked pretty terrible earlier in the year.
|
New Zealand15076 Posts
On September 22 2015 20:51 deacon.frost wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2015 20:50 Phredxor wrote:On September 22 2015 20:49 deacon.frost wrote:
OK, what happened, had to go for lunch. sOs going hard for the reverse all-kill! But how? What have he done to win against Zest(again)?
Some sexy colossus drop/warp in harass which Zest dealt with rather poorly. Killed Zests nat and then just got a big enough army to crush Zest before he had enough tempests.
|
On September 22 2015 20:50 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2015 20:49 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:45 DarkLordOlli wrote:On September 22 2015 20:44 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:42 DarkLordOlli wrote:On September 22 2015 20:41 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:39 DarkLordOlli wrote:On September 22 2015 20:38 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:35 boxerfred wrote:On September 22 2015 20:34 DarkLordOlli wrote:
Slight advantage for sOs with these builds Why? Honest question. I thought it's Robo > Twilight > Stargate > Robo. Zest definitely had the upper hand in terms of build orders with the earlier Nexus. And the only thing sOs' blink investment accomplished was delaying his Forge and Robo Bay. The nexus timing was basically identical, the only difference was the followup. sOs went stalkers and twilight council, Zest opted for 3 gates first and then a robo with 3 sentries. "basically identical" haha you're funny It was 1gate nexus from both I can't tell if you don't understand the game or you're trying to troll. Zest's Nexus was about 12 sec earlier. It was 1gate nexus from both I understand that StarCraft is a complex and hard game to understand for some people, but please get your shit together. Yes, they were both making a Nexus having just 1 gate and a msc; "1gate nex", but they went about it very differently. sOs mined much more gas while Zest just mined enough to be able to afford msc warp gate research and so their nexus timings weren't indentical at all. 2 probes is a big fucking deal. I understand not being a massive douche is a complex and hard thing to understand for some people, but please get your shit together
Here, we are discussing StarCraft and you come with your off-topic nonsense. Fuck off, please, pleb.
User was warned for this post
User was temp banned for this post.
|
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On September 22 2015 20:51 DJHelium wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2015 20:49 deacon.frost wrote:
OK, what happened, had to go for lunch. Double warp prism drop in the pocket natulal with colossus and zealots. Big warpin as well, killing units and the nexus. Meanwhile sOs is posturing outside the third, so Zest can't go home to defend.
Sounds good, need to see in the evening. THANKS! 
|
I'm ready for the colossus drop into flying your prism over stalkers and loosing the game
|
New Zealand15076 Posts
I feel like Stats is gonna get crushed by the momentum here.
|
Really hope this choice pays off for KT. But I think Life would have been a much better choice.
|
On September 22 2015 20:50 14CC wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2015 20:48 fezvez wrote:On September 22 2015 20:45 mderg wrote:On September 22 2015 20:44 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:42 DarkLordOlli wrote:On September 22 2015 20:41 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:39 DarkLordOlli wrote:On September 22 2015 20:38 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:35 boxerfred wrote:On September 22 2015 20:34 DarkLordOlli wrote:
Slight advantage for sOs with these builds Why? Honest question. I thought it's Robo > Twilight > Stargate > Robo. Zest definitely had the upper hand in terms of build orders with the earlier Nexus. And the only thing sOs' blink investment accomplished was delaying his Forge and Robo Bay. The nexus timing was basically identical, the only difference was the followup. sOs went stalkers and twilight council, Zest opted for 3 gates first and then a robo with 3 sentries. "basically identical" haha you're funny It was 1gate nexus from both I can't tell if you don't understand the game or you're trying to troll. Zest's Nexus was about 12 sec earlier. which is nothing in PvP 12 second is literally nothing. When you have 40~50% of the nexus construction difference, then, yes, you can say that the difference is significant enough maybe it's nothing in bronze league, but these guys aren't bronze leaguers although sometimes they make mistakes that makes one think they indeed are.
Please, I know that it's always nice to feel like the misunderstood martyr, but literally all the LR thread is telling you that you spout a trail bullshit
|
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On September 22 2015 20:52 BlackCompany wrote:
I'm ready for the colossus drop into flying your prism over stalkers and loosing the game
Proxy gate into stalker rush?
|
On September 22 2015 20:51 Aeromi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2015 20:50 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
Most Protoss players pull bullshit. sOs pulls shenanigans. That is why sOs is more likeable Lilbow > sOs
I know you French are continuously drunk on wine, but even the drunkest Frenchman can't be irrational and drunk enough to actually think that.
|
On September 22 2015 20:50 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2015 20:49 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:45 DarkLordOlli wrote:On September 22 2015 20:44 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:42 DarkLordOlli wrote:On September 22 2015 20:41 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:39 DarkLordOlli wrote:On September 22 2015 20:38 14CC wrote:On September 22 2015 20:35 boxerfred wrote:On September 22 2015 20:34 DarkLordOlli wrote:
Slight advantage for sOs with these builds Why? Honest question. I thought it's Robo > Twilight > Stargate > Robo. Zest definitely had the upper hand in terms of build orders with the earlier Nexus. And the only thing sOs' blink investment accomplished was delaying his Forge and Robo Bay. The nexus timing was basically identical, the only difference was the followup. sOs went stalkers and twilight council, Zest opted for 3 gates first and then a robo with 3 sentries. "basically identical" haha you're funny It was 1gate nexus from both I can't tell if you don't understand the game or you're trying to troll. Zest's Nexus was about 12 sec earlier. It was 1gate nexus from both I understand that StarCraft is a complex and hard game to understand for some people, but please get your shit together. Yes, they were both making a Nexus having just 1 gate and a msc; "1gate nex", but they went about it very differently. sOs mined much more gas while Zest just mined enough to be able to afford msc warp gate research and so their nexus timings weren't indentical at all. 2 probes is a big fucking deal. I understand not being a massive douche is a complex and hard thing to understand for some people, but please get your shit together
Just joining in the posting to say "lol"
|
Australia18228 Posts
|
i'd favor Stats usually but too much momentum for sOs who crushed Zest twice :L
still I believe in you Stats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
