EPTOn April 07 2015 18:59 Lorning wrote:
That sounds amazing. Might make on of those too
and I may be out of ketchup That sounds amazing. Might make on of those too
I can't tell if you're joking or playing it up anymore
[SPL] KT vs ST-YFW Round 2 2015 - Page 5
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
I can't tell if you're joking or playing it up anymore | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
| ||
|
fruity.
England1711 Posts
| ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:01 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: I can't tell if you're joking or playing it up anymore I don't joke about bacon and mayo I only eat it | ||
Olli
Austria24420 Posts
| ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24585 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:01 OtherWorld wrote: This game embodies everything that his wrong with SC2's current econ model Yeah, I am slowly coming over to the LotV changes | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:01 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: I can't tell if you're joking or playing it up anymore He's probably joking, a pure mayo sandwich sounds more Lorning-esque | ||
|
Alchemik
Poland7124 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:01 OtherWorld wrote: This game embodies everything that his wrong with SC2's current econ model also with overgrowth | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:01 OtherWorld wrote: This game embodies everything that his wrong with SC2's current econ model tbf games like this would happen in BW too because of how chokey and mech-friendly 2p maps were | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:01 Heartland wrote: Yeah, I am slowly coming over to the LotV changes Not sure if those are the solution either >< | ||
|
Alchemik
Poland7124 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:02 OtherWorld wrote: Not sure if those are the solution either >< they're definitely a solution to this | ||
|
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:02 OtherWorld wrote: Not sure if those are the solution either >< I dont like the 12 worker start or that you get punished for NOT expanding TT it'S a bi to extreme imo. But that's what a beta is for. | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24585 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:01 Ej_ wrote: tbf games like this would happen in BW too because of how chokey and mech-friendly 2p maps were I hate to use this ancient argument that mostly tools use, but... BW handled that better due to unit spreading, control group limitations, eco changes and the difference between above all T and Z. T turtling vs P is perhaps a bit more like what this is, I guess. | ||
|
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
| ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:03 GumBa wrote: I dont like the 12 worker start or that you get punished for NOT expanding TT it'S a bi to extreme imo. But that's what a beta is for. everybody thinks it's not going to make it out of the beta and DK is like "hahahaha" | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24585 Posts
| ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:03 GumBa wrote: I dont like the 12 worker start or that you get punished for NOT expanding TT it'S a bi to extreme imo. But that's what a beta is for. Reduced efficiency is the shit. But I guess that it's "too complicated for casuals" in Blizzard's eyes, sadly. | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
On April 07 2015 18:50 GumBa wrote: I even made PL threads the week before D: dammit senpai notice me :3 Oh that day you made both threads and told me to do them because your internet was shite?  | ||
|
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:04 Pandemona wrote: Oh that day you made both threads and told me to do them because your internet was shite? I was in the thread though!!!!!!!! senpai pls | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On April 07 2015 19:04 OtherWorld wrote: Reduced efficiency is the shit. But I guess that it's "too complicated for casuals" in Blizzard's eyes, sadly. it's literally workers not mining because a mineral patch is taken lol. It's ever simpler than current economy where workers queue for a set time before they start bouncing | ||
| ||
