EPT[Code S] Ro32 Group H Season 1 2014 - Page 28
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
| ||
|
looken
727 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
| ||
|
aZealot
New Zealand5447 Posts
On February 28 2014 20:19 ETisME wrote: lol i thought the mutas were so dead there No, Stalkers suck against that many Mutalisks. No guardian shield either to ease the pain of bouncing glaive worms. A few more Archons and a couple of Storms and he may have been alright. But, he had too many Mutas. | ||
|
Mozdk
Denmark6989 Posts
On February 28 2014 20:20 Larkin wrote: Wow, mutas just not caring about stalkers, archons and storms. 1 health muta = max health muta. Still can't phantom that that is actually a thing. | ||
|
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On February 28 2014 20:21 aZealot wrote: No, Stalkers suck against that many Mutalisks. No guardian shield either to ease the pain of bouncing glaive worms. A few more Archons and a couple of Storms and he may have been alright. But, he had too many Mutas. And those delicious 3-3 upgrades | ||
|
partydude89
1850 Posts
| ||
|
looken
727 Posts
On February 28 2014 20:20 Larkin wrote: Wow, mutas just not caring about stalkers, archons and storms. well to be fair, the storms where way to late and the archons right in front so he did not have to focus fire (no clumping) | ||
|
Bowzar
Sweden741 Posts
| ||
|
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
| ||
|
Flonomenalz
Nigeria3519 Posts
On February 28 2014 20:21 Scarecrow wrote: I hate when games get to that point where zerg has a huge bank, even if you completely own the engagement they just remax on muta and you lose. Well when you choose to play a super safe macro build as Protoss, that's pretty much how Zerg has to respond, aside from going SHs. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18631 Posts
On February 28 2014 20:21 Scarecrow wrote: I hate when games get to that point where zerg has a huge bank, even if you completely own the engagement they just remax on muta and you lose. zerg has to play a very good game before that remax to get such a bank so I think its ok they can do this... | ||
|
sibs
635 Posts
On February 28 2014 20:20 Larkin wrote: Wow, mutas just not caring about stalkers, archons and storms. I thought curious would win with the BL army, that was a 3/3 air 3/3 ground army + fungals on choke, but archon aoe way stronger than you think. | ||
|
ETisME
12704 Posts
On February 28 2014 20:21 aZealot wrote: No, Stalkers suck against that many Mutalisks. No guardian shield either to ease the pain of bouncing glaive worms. A few more Archons and a couple of Storms and he may have been alright. But, he had too many Mutas. but the archons  I have nightmare attacking into them with my mutas lol | ||
|
aZealot
New Zealand5447 Posts
Yep, that too! Right, bed for me. Calling Roro to take the rematch vs Stats and for 2 Z to advance. | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
 | ||
|
Rhaeide
Spain304 Posts
| ||
|
partydude89
1850 Posts
On February 28 2014 20:21 Scarecrow wrote: I hate when games get to that point where zerg has a huge bank, even if you completely own the engagement they just remax on muta and you lose. but if stats had a big bank, he could make a lot of production and do the same thing. Curious had him on the back end after he first made mutas and totally deserved to win that game. | ||
|
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
On February 28 2014 20:21 Scarecrow wrote: I hate when games get to that point where zerg has a huge bank, even if you completely own the engagement they just remax on muta and you lose. Well that is the result of being dominated/contained on your side of the map for the whole game. It would just be wrong if protoss could win in such game. He also never went pass 3 bases, even less when you factor in his main and natural got mined out eventually. | ||
|
Flonomenalz
Nigeria3519 Posts
| ||
| ||
