[IPL] FC49: Polt v HyuN @SXSW - Page 7
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
fezvez
France3021 Posts
| ||
![]()
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
![]() | ||
HotGlueGun
United States1409 Posts
| ||
ThePowerHour
United States834 Posts
| ||
Boanerges
Switzerland156 Posts
Sounds garbage? You shoulden't have spent so much time with your sheeps. Late WoL Zerg is just stupid. Edit: This post is just out of pure frustration in Me vs Zerg... because I think its not balanced. Just my opinion. Edit2: And i'm a Polt fanboy :p User was warned for this post | ||
JJH777
United States4376 Posts
| ||
Serimek
France2274 Posts
| ||
PhoenixVoid
Canada32737 Posts
| ||
Serimek
France2274 Posts
On March 09 2013 08:56 JJH777 wrote: The really should have added more maps. Only having 6 maps for a bo11 is super lame.. Whirlwind would have been great I think it was planned to be a bo9 or bo7 considering the look of the "11" in the op image | ||
PhoenixVoid
Canada32737 Posts
So many Infestors @_@ | ||
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
Polt did beat him 2-0 rather easily (and put an end to HyuN's 5 win streak) in the GD Studio HotS KotH like 12 days ago. | ||
the`postman
United States1643 Posts
| ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
ixzenxi
United States138 Posts
| ||
xongnox
540 Posts
| ||
Mask DeMasque
United States415 Posts
On March 09 2013 09:06 Bagration wrote: Yeah Mass Infestors! Sick fungals, infested Terran rainstorms, and sick neurals! BEAUTIFUL fungals | ||
Boanerges
Switzerland156 Posts
| ||
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
On March 09 2013 09:06 AlternativeEgo wrote: Polt did beat him 2-0 rather easily (and put an end to HyuN's 5 win streak) in the GD Studio HotS KotH like 12 days ago. The game is still new- to make such a blanket statement for the whole future of the game is ridiculous. | ||
zephiK
United States372 Posts
| ||
Boanerges
Switzerland156 Posts
On March 09 2013 09:09 tomatriedes wrote: The game is still new- to make such a blanket statement for the whole future of the game is ridiculous. Yes it is a stupid statement. But for the moment its true ![]() | ||
| ||