[Code S] RO32 Group F 2013 GSL Season 1 - Page 61
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Asha
United Kingdom38199 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On January 30 2013 20:21 MCDayC wrote: HI (no real names ![]() Also sounds like a cool kinda cheese that MKP did. Oh our bad Muhammed Corin Day Cadwallader | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
illumn
New Zealand437 Posts
Now just need MVP to make it through. | ||
Lasbike
France2888 Posts
| ||
ramon
Germany4842 Posts
or was it? low quality is killing me | ||
dreamseller
Australia914 Posts
| ||
MrCon
France29748 Posts
| ||
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
![]() | ||
derpface
Sweden925 Posts
| ||
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On January 30 2013 20:26 Hassybaby wrote: Oh our bad Muhammed Corin Day Cadwallader I don't even,.,.,. | ||
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On January 30 2013 20:17 nomyx wrote: You did have MKP at a .22% chance of winning a game in Iron Squid and he did win a game Sorry, no. He had .22% chance of 3-0ing Life. His chance of taking at least one game off him was 34% (Life had 66% to 3-0). Read it again | ||
illumn
New Zealand437 Posts
| ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
Azurues
Malaysia5612 Posts
| ||
scr
Hungary1025 Posts
| ||
FineAndDandy
166 Posts
On January 30 2013 20:26 Vindicare605 wrote: Says you. I havent had that experience with anyone I've met in the esports scene or any of my friends who watch Starcraft with me casually. What's known as "color" commentary in Sports is good for the entertainment value even if it comes off as biased. This is why Charles Barkley gets such high television ratings, this is why Jeff Van Gundy is one of the main commentators for ESPN during basketball games. People prefer exciting commentary that creates or amplifies drama and excitement over bland and politically correct commentary. Sports has taught us this over the years at least in the American market. The only detriment is when the color commentary has no balanced analysis to go with it, and in the case of Tastetosis they have some of the best analytical commentary in the business that more than balances out their color commentary. That's why they're the best. They create drama which creates excitement for the viewer but their analysis is on point as well and that careful balance is hard as hell for a casting duo to have. You can be exciting without being biased. Don't remember when Van gundy is biased. I watch plenty of NBA. They will give credit where credit is due. Barkley is only slightly biased sometimes. But the thing is Barkley is not casting. | ||
jubil
United States2602 Posts
| ||
Kreb
4834 Posts
| ||
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
| ||
| ||