EPT[GSTL] ST vs. FXO 2012 Season 3 Semi-Finals - Page 44
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
FlyingTurtle
United States248 Posts
| ||
Destructicon
4713 Posts
On November 24 2012 17:52 blade55555 wrote: It doesn't work vs mass carrier. Neuraling is literally impossible you can't neural them all at the same time. So not going neural was fine, corruptors if he had double upgrades would have worked. He would have had 0-1 corruptors vs 3-3 carrier/voidray and it would have gotten crushed. Need to be on even upgrades with corruptors to beat that army. Yes I know, Corrupters are good vs Carriers because the 2 base armor makes them very durable against interceptors, but if you don't keep up on upgrades with the protoss, that advantage gets negated. I still think, some neurals would still be better then no neurals at all, its just using your enemies supply against him, and could tip the scales in your favor. | ||
|
tuho12345
4482 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
yyfpulls
United States2185 Posts
| ||
|
Jehct
New Zealand9115 Posts
On November 24 2012 17:56 Destructicon wrote: Yes I know, Corrupters are good vs Carriers because the 2 base armor makes them very durable against interceptors, but if you don't keep up on upgrades with the protoss, that advantage gets negated. I still think, some neurals would still be better then no neurals at all, its just using your enemies supply against him, and could tip the scales in your favor. That's not how it works, you neural, they focus the infestor, you've wasted the energy and lost an infestor. Straight up infested terrans + fungals is always better against carriers (assuming the opponent is microing well). | ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
not even patchzergy this game | ||
|
Hall0wed
United States8486 Posts
| ||
|
GARcher
Canada294 Posts
| ||
|
tylerf
739 Posts
 | ||
|
yawnoC
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
Destructicon
4713 Posts
| ||
|
Obaten
United States730 Posts
| ||
|
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
| ||
|
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
| ||
|
SafeAsCheese
United States4924 Posts
On November 24 2012 17:58 Destructicon wrote: This is so successful, I wonder why zerg don't do it more often against Protoss. I only see Leenock and Life do it, and even they don't do it consistently. Because if P defends well there is no followup | ||
|
tuho12345
4482 Posts
| ||
|
bokchoi
Korea (South)9498 Posts
| ||
|
corpsepose
1678 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
not over? | ||
| ||
