|
On November 19 2012 09:31 Garnet wrote: I love how the match-ups are always conveniently KeSPA vs eSF.
I'm also curious how they set up the bracket. I feel like they just do whatever they want without any explanation.
|
Morning guys 4:10am here - A good reason to get up and watch some proper SC2 instead of PvP and PvZ.
|
Calander says it's starting! At work so looking for some LRs, even if semi-casual (like a sentence or 2 about the game at the end) would be super appreciated.
|
hopefully yonghwa and nestea falls
|
Yup, free. Score another one for the cheapskates ^_^;
==
^ die
|
On November 19 2012 13:11 X3GoldDot wrote: hopefully yonghwa and nestea falls
what kind of evil person do you have to be to hope yonghwa loses after it's taken this long for him to get in!?
|
|
Looks like they are running late today. Thats a first iirc
|
On November 19 2012 13:14 Hall0wed wrote: Looks like they are running late today. Thats a first iirc
delayed for half an hour due to Khaldor and Wolf's flight from China being delayed
|
On November 19 2012 13:09 DJSub wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2012 09:31 Garnet wrote: I love how the match-ups are always conveniently KeSPA vs eSF. I'm also curious how they set up the bracket. I feel like they just do whatever they want without any explanation.
I think it's by GSL point, which would generally result in KeSPA vs eSF, since KeSPA players have no points, they would always be lower seed
|
On November 19 2012 13:16 ragz_gt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2012 13:09 DJSub wrote:On November 19 2012 09:31 Garnet wrote: I love how the match-ups are always conveniently KeSPA vs eSF. I'm also curious how they set up the bracket. I feel like they just do whatever they want without any explanation. I think it's by GSL point, which would generally result in KeSPA vs eSF, since KeSPA players have no points, they would always be lower seed
If it was based on point, I think Nestea shouldn't meet Heart in Ro48
|
On November 19 2012 13:16 ragz_gt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2012 13:09 DJSub wrote:On November 19 2012 09:31 Garnet wrote: I love how the match-ups are always conveniently KeSPA vs eSF. I'm also curious how they set up the bracket. I feel like they just do whatever they want without any explanation. I think it's by GSL point, which would generally result in KeSPA vs eSF, since KeSPA players have no points, they would always be lower seed
I thought it was random, but that sort of makes sense. Except for Heart vs Nestea who both should have a decent number of points as opposed to Yongwha vs Mini.
I think it has to be random, but for the most part they simply align a Code B qualifier with a last season Code A. And randomised bracket from there.
|
Wolf/Kalidor are going to need so much Hot 6ix today.
|
I don't understand why everyone thinks tails is gonna 2-0 Bbyong. I mean Bbyong went through qualifiers to get to code S right? So he's obviously pretty good.
|
United States23455 Posts
On November 19 2012 13:23 coasts wrote: I don't understand why everyone thinks tails is gonna 2-0 Bbyong. I mean Bbyong went through qualifiers to get to code S right? So he's obviously pretty good.
Tails 4-killed LG-IM and then went 8-0 in the Code A qualifiers.
|
On November 19 2012 13:24 Fionn wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2012 13:23 coasts wrote: I don't understand why everyone thinks tails is gonna 2-0 Bbyong. I mean Bbyong went through qualifiers to get to code S right? So he's obviously pretty good. Tails 4-killed LG-IM and then went 8-0 in the Code A qualifiers. The 4-kill includes Mvp and YoDa.
|
On November 19 2012 13:24 Fionn wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2012 13:23 coasts wrote: I don't understand why everyone thinks tails is gonna 2-0 Bbyong. I mean Bbyong went through qualifiers to get to code S right? So he's obviously pretty good. Tails 4-killed LG-IM and then went 8-0 in the Code A qualifiers.
I think you might just be one of the biggest hipsters on TL Fionn. Not that I know if you support Tails at the moment, but you always seem to like to 'pick-up' super no-name quantities to root for =P
|
Jangbi and Flying? Oooh...
|
United States97276 Posts
On November 19 2012 13:28 bittman wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2012 13:24 Fionn wrote:On November 19 2012 13:23 coasts wrote: I don't understand why everyone thinks tails is gonna 2-0 Bbyong. I mean Bbyong went through qualifiers to get to code S right? So he's obviously pretty good. Tails 4-killed LG-IM and then went 8-0 in the Code A qualifiers. I think you might just be one of the biggest hipsters on TL Fionn. Not that I know if you support Tails at the moment, but you always seem to like to 'pick-up' super no-name quantities to root for =P Dont let Waxangel see you calling someone else the biggest hipster
|
On November 19 2012 13:30 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2012 13:28 bittman wrote:On November 19 2012 13:24 Fionn wrote:On November 19 2012 13:23 coasts wrote: I don't understand why everyone thinks tails is gonna 2-0 Bbyong. I mean Bbyong went through qualifiers to get to code S right? So he's obviously pretty good. Tails 4-killed LG-IM and then went 8-0 in the Code A qualifiers. I think you might just be one of the biggest hipsters on TL Fionn. Not that I know if you support Tails at the moment, but you always seem to like to 'pick-up' super no-name quantities to root for =P Dont let Waxangel see you calling someone else the biggest hipster
*one of
Maybe it's a writer thing.
|
|
|
|