|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
Groups 10, 12, 13, 16 play at 02:00 GMT (+00:00) Groups 11, 14, 15, 17 play at 05:00 GMT (+00:00)
f5 warriors assemble!!!
|
|
Are these qualifiers even legal ? I don't understand why a group of people (Kespa players) would get seeded and recieve such an absurdly favourable treatment considering their unexistant Starcraft 2 achievements.
|
On July 29 2012 19:08 SiroKO wrote: Are these qualifiers even legal ? I don't understand why a group of people (Kespa players) would get seeded and recieve such an absurdly favourable treatment considering their unexistant Starcraft 2 achievements.
I wouldn't get terribly worked up over anything WCG does.
|
On July 29 2012 19:09 MCXD wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 19:08 SiroKO wrote: Are these qualifiers even legal ? I don't understand why a group of people (Kespa players) would get seeded and recieve such an absurdly favourable treatment considering their unexistant Starcraft 2 achievements. I wouldn't get terribly worked up over anything WCG does.
Doesn't really answer his question does it?
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On July 29 2012 19:08 SiroKO wrote: Are these qualifiers even legal ? I don't understand why a group of people (Kespa players) would get seeded and recieve such an absurdly favourable treatment considering their unexistant Starcraft 2 achievements. of course they're legal, what.
|
On July 29 2012 19:13 BBMorti wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 19:09 MCXD wrote:On July 29 2012 19:08 SiroKO wrote: Are these qualifiers even legal ? I don't understand why a group of people (Kespa players) would get seeded and recieve such an absurdly favourable treatment considering their unexistant Starcraft 2 achievements. I wouldn't get terribly worked up over anything WCG does. Doesn't really answer his question does it?
I'm pretty sure his question was rhetorical as it's pretty obvious WCG can do whatever they want since it's their tournament.
|
On July 29 2012 19:15 Kiyo. wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 19:13 BBMorti wrote:On July 29 2012 19:09 MCXD wrote:On July 29 2012 19:08 SiroKO wrote: Are these qualifiers even legal ? I don't understand why a group of people (Kespa players) would get seeded and recieve such an absurdly favourable treatment considering their unexistant Starcraft 2 achievements. I wouldn't get terribly worked up over anything WCG does. Doesn't really answer his question does it? I'm pretty sure his question was rhetorical as it's pretty obvious WCG can do whatever they want since it's their tournament. This is not about what they can do, but why they do it.
|
On July 29 2012 19:19 BBMorti wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 19:15 Kiyo. wrote:On July 29 2012 19:13 BBMorti wrote:On July 29 2012 19:09 MCXD wrote:On July 29 2012 19:08 SiroKO wrote: Are these qualifiers even legal ? I don't understand why a group of people (Kespa players) would get seeded and recieve such an absurdly favourable treatment considering their unexistant Starcraft 2 achievements. I wouldn't get terribly worked up over anything WCG does. Doesn't really answer his question does it? I'm pretty sure his question was rhetorical as it's pretty obvious WCG can do whatever they want since it's their tournament. This is not about what they can do, but why they do it. To support the players/organisation that perpetuated eSports in Korea for the past ~10 years? (Notably the post-Savior period/2007 onwards)
There are places where invites are completely unjustified; this isn't one of them. You're being stupid.
|
On July 29 2012 19:21 Jehct wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2012 19:19 BBMorti wrote:On July 29 2012 19:15 Kiyo. wrote:On July 29 2012 19:13 BBMorti wrote:On July 29 2012 19:09 MCXD wrote:On July 29 2012 19:08 SiroKO wrote: Are these qualifiers even legal ? I don't understand why a group of people (Kespa players) would get seeded and recieve such an absurdly favourable treatment considering their unexistant Starcraft 2 achievements. I wouldn't get terribly worked up over anything WCG does. Doesn't really answer his question does it? I'm pretty sure his question was rhetorical as it's pretty obvious WCG can do whatever they want since it's their tournament. This is not about what they can do, but why they do it. To support the players/organisation that perpetuated eSports in Korea for the past ~10 years? (Notably the post-Savior period/2007 onwards) There are places where invites are completely unjustified; this isn't one of them. You're being stupid. Not much else to take from this than a click on the report button. Why even bother to post if this is the quality to bring?
|
Looks like Seed plays today, GO SEEDU!
On the topic of Kespa qualifiers for WCG, I think for now It's needed. But as soon as the current proleague season ends or a bit afterwards you will see this stuff go away.
It's not like the kespa players will be able to qualify for the WCG finals by completely avoiding the non-kespa players, unless I don't understand the format correctly they will play vs each other in the ro16. edit: round of 30 or " semifinal stage "
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On July 29 2012 19:25 Dodgin wrote: Looks like Seed plays today, GO SEEDU!
On the topic of Kespa qualifiers for WCG, I think for now It's needed. But as soon as the current proleague season ends or a bit afterwards you will see this stuff go away.
It's not like the kespa players will be able to qualify for the WCG finals by completely avoiding the non-kespa players, unless I don't understand the format correctly they will play vs each other in the ro16. august 1st, a few more days yet! haha
and yeah, kespa meets gom in RO16 OSL, RO32 WCG and RO32 WCS, it's not like they get a seed to the RO4.
They just have different qualifier brackets to get through. Relax everyone!
|
Oh I just clicked on the groups in the OP and saw Seed in group 17 so I thought he was playing today, why would you lie to me opterown?
|
On July 29 2012 19:08 SiroKO wrote: Are these qualifiers even legal ? I don't understand why a group of people (Kespa players) would get seeded and recieve such an absurdly favourable treatment considering their unexistant Starcraft 2 achievements. Wait, you realize that the kespa players above (reality and stork) still had to play in a qualifier to get to where they are right? They weren't exactly "seeded" they had to go through their own qualifier, just like the non-kespa players need to go through their own qualifier (except they have to do it all in one day) as well.
I fail to see you point here. What do you mean by, "favourable treatment"?
btw: puzzle, creator, yonghwa, alicia, and seed/brown fighting~~~~~ plz help me forget that squirtle didn't make it through by having all of you guys magically make ro16!
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On July 29 2012 19:30 Dodgin wrote: Oh I just clicked on the groups in the OP and saw Seed in group 17 so I thought he was playing today, why would you lie to me opterown? Wednesday, Aug 01 2:00am GMT (GMT+00:00) (see top of OP :p) they take a 2 day break, presumably so OGN can cover SPL in the meantime for mon/tues as they normally do
|
Will Clide still play in this? Because it was said that he was going to KT to start working right away when GSTL was over.
|
well that's what I get for not reading carefully, I figured it was today since you posted it today.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On July 29 2012 19:32 Dodgin wrote: well that's what I get for not reading carefully, I figured it was today since you posted it today. :p i have itchy fingers. must maek more LR!!!
|
On July 29 2012 19:08 SiroKO wrote: Are these qualifiers even legal ? I don't understand why a group of people (Kespa players) would get seeded and recieve such an absurdly favourable treatment considering their unexistant Starcraft 2 achievements. DId u miss WCS qualifiers where 7 or so people got seeded from Proleague results(withouit playing a single game), why post it now? WCG is way more fair, there are no auto-seeds.
|
|
|
|