EPTMSI Pro Cup #12 by Millenium - Page 11
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
lannisport
878 Posts
| ||
|
Psyclon
Bulgaria2443 Posts
 | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32743 Posts
| ||
Poopi
France12906 Posts
I hope that he just played really below his level because he doesn't care about the cup anymore (because of WCS for example) because losing to Adelscott is really really sad. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32743 Posts
On August 12 2012 03:48 Poopi wrote: How Polt was able to lose to Adel? o_o. I hope that he just played really below his level because he doesn't care about the cup anymore (because of WCS for example) because losing to Adelscott is really really sad. Gateway all-ins that Polt was probably not that familiar with. I think it's mostly Polt simply not caring about foreign tournaments recently, and probably played because he did not want to look bm. Or maybe he didn't want to reveal his strategies against TAiLS in WCS. | ||
|
Otolia
France5805 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32743 Posts
On August 12 2012 03:52 Otolia wrote: Hey the haters, keep your negative attitude out of the thread. Adelscott just beat two Coda A Koreans with timings and all-ins. That's something to recognize, of course Adel doesn't have the same macro as every Korean he beat and would lose in a straight-up macro game. He really stepped up his game since the WCS and deserves to be acknowledge as such. Code S players. | ||
|
Otolia
France5805 Posts
Code A and Code S are really close now but the gap between Code A and B has increased by a lot. So I prefer to say Code A to classify them as good koreans. Not high profile like Seed, MC or DRG but very good nonetheless. | ||
|
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
On August 12 2012 03:55 Otolia wrote: Code A and Code S are really close now but the gap between Code A and B has increased by a lot. So I prefer to say Code A to classify them as good koreans. Not high profile like Seed, MC or DRG but very good nonetheless. Symbol and Polt are as good as those koreans that you listed. And Polt probaly just doesnt care and wants to concentrate on WCS because I bet you if Polt had this high up on his priority list he would have won. That is not so say Adel is not good no he is quite good for EU but he is not on the level of Polt and Symbol | ||
|
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
On August 12 2012 03:55 Otolia wrote: Code A and Code S are really close now but the gap between Code A and B has increased by a lot. So I prefer to say Code A to classify them as good koreans. Not high profile like Seed, MC or DRG but very good nonetheless. This makes no sense. A season ago, and you would have not even used Seed as a high profile player. Polt and Coca are Code S caliber players. Polt is actually Code S and Coca should be in Code S. | ||
|
Otolia
France5805 Posts
On August 12 2012 06:36 Fionn wrote: This makes no sense. A season ago, and you would have not even used Seed as a high profile player. Polt and Coca are Code S caliber players. Polt is actually Code S and Coca should be in Code S. It makes no sense because you are missing the point. I'm saying they are both Code A in order to avoid this kind of meaningless discussion about who should be in Code S and who shouldn't because it's a rather thin frontier nowadays with Seed being there and MVP not being in. Guess I was the only one getting the memo. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32743 Posts
On August 12 2012 07:11 Otolia wrote: It makes no sense because you are missing the point. I'm saying they are both Code A in order to avoid this kind of meaningless discussion about who should be in Code S and who shouldn't because it's a rather thin frontier nowadays with Seed being there and MVP not being in. Guess I was the only one getting the memo. Mvp is in Code S brah. Guess you weren't getting the memo. | ||
| ||
