EPT[Over] TSL4 Q1 - EU/NA #1 - Page 28
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Serimek
France2274 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
Champloo
Germany1850 Posts
On June 13 2012 06:24 Mietiex wrote: Just as so many people weren't convinced that Spades wasn't/isn't a maphacker. What? Most people were pretty easy to convince there, cause Spades was a fucking hacker in bw already. Hackers gonna hack. | ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
| ||
|
Lord_J
Kenya1085 Posts
On June 13 2012 06:24 Mietiex wrote: Just as so many people weren't convinced that Spades wasn't/isn't a maphacker. Please take your paranoid ramblings elsewhere. You're annoying. | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
On June 13 2012 06:01 Serimek wrote: Never heard of Ascend, who is he ? Is he good ? (I guess I'll see soon anyway...) He is pretty descent. | ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
On June 13 2012 06:27 Logros wrote: C'mon an entire bracket full of good europeans and the korean is gonna win it? you seemed surprised ^^ jk I'm sure someone can take out Daisy. If not, congrats to him | ||
|
xeo1
United States429 Posts
| ||
|
Serimek
France2274 Posts
He seems so. However, there's clearly some lack of alchemy between him and CatZ imo. Well, it'll surely improve quickly. | ||
|
Champloo
Germany1850 Posts
| ||
|
Serimek
France2274 Posts
On June 13 2012 06:31 xeo1 wrote: question: can we play in every qualifier? like can I try in all 10 of NA qualifiers? or once you play in one and lose you're out. Of course you can play in all 10. Why would they made a point ranking otherwise ? | ||
|
ThePowerHour
United States834 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On June 13 2012 06:32 Serimek wrote: He seems so. However, there's clearly some lack of alchemy between him and CatZ imo. Well, it'll surely improve quickly. Alchemy? I'm gonna use that expression. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
Mietiex
Netherlands31 Posts
On June 13 2012 06:28 Lord_J wrote: Please take your paranoid ramblings elsewhere. You're annoying. You can disagree with me, but you don't have to call me annoying. I disagree with most people calling Kenyans annoying | ||
|
m0ck
4194 Posts
On June 13 2012 06:34 ThePowerHour wrote: That attack went well for Lowely, but I really thought it could have gone better. He didn't have the lings to back-up his infestors, went in with 20 or so. | ||
|
00Visor
4337 Posts
| ||
|
Lord_J
Kenya1085 Posts
On June 13 2012 06:35 Mietiex wrote: You can disagree with me, but you don't have to call me annoying. I disagree with most people calling Kenyans annoying I neither agree with you nor disagree with you. I just think the discussion you insist on continuing here is out of place and disruptive. Hence, "annoying." | ||
|
Get.Midikem
Sweden312 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary26004 Posts
On June 13 2012 06:16 Mietiex wrote: I don't really get that analogy. It's not like I said everyone is maphacking. I just said that I think it's weird that (imo these unknown players), referenced as online tourney gods, are doing so well. That would be the same as: All admins jump to conclusions. It's a perfect 1:1 analogy. You just said they might as well be maphacking. As in you are just going to assume the worst about them. Anyways I'm not an admin so now who's not making sense?  | ||
| ||
